IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241265322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Makes Female Players Pay for Female Mobile Games?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuoqi Teng
  • Xin Wu
  • Chang Chen
  • Choi Nak-Hwan

Abstract

Extant mobile game research has paid great attention to men who play mobile games while ignoring female players. Although “willingness to pay†(WTP) is regarded as an important dependent variable in gaming research, few studies have explored this variable from an anthropomorphic perspective. To fill these gaps in the literature, this study aims to study the antecedents of WTP, with a focus on virtual in-game items and the mediating effect of work/play motivation. Based on the determinants of anthropomorphism, this work examines certain aspects of mobile games, including servant role in mobile games, a sense of communion, and the attractiveness of the characters. This study explores the effects of such characteristics on work/play motivation, as well as its influence on WTP. A game called “Love and Producer†was selected for this study, and the feedback from 230 female respondents was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results show that the servant role and the attractiveness of the characters affect female players’ desire to work with the characters, and the communion and the attractiveness of the characters affect female players’ desire to play with these characters. The female players’ desire to work and play with the characters directly influenced their willingness to pay for virtual game items. Moreover, the mediating effect that playing games has on female players’ desire to work/play with the characters was also validated. This article introduces new information on female game character design and interactivity in games.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuoqi Teng & Xin Wu & Chang Chen & Choi Nak-Hwan, 2024. "What Makes Female Players Pay for Female Mobile Games?," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241265322
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241265322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241265322
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241265322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jocelyn Evans & Sara Z. Evans & Daniel B. Shank & Quinton P. Fallon, 2021. "Motivations for Social Interaction: The Case of Pokémon Go After the Fad Ended," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 547-551, January.
    2. Hyeongmin Christian Kim & Thomas Kramer, 2015. "Do Materialists Prefer the "Brand-as-Servant"? The Interactive Effect of Anthropomorphized Brand Roles and Materialism on Consumer Responses," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 42(2), pages 284-299.
    3. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    4. Patzer, Gordon L., 1983. "Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 229-241, June.
    5. Carlos J. Torelli & Rohini Ahluwalia & Shirley Y. Y. Cheng & Nicholas J. Olson & Jennifer L. Stoner, 2017. "Redefining Home: How Cultural Distinctiveness Affects the Malleability of In-Group Boundaries and Brand Preferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 44-61.
    6. Joonheui Bae & Dong-Mo Koo & Pekka Mattila, 2016. "Affective motives to play online games," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 174-184, March.
    7. Sang Kim & Kyung Kim & Pekka Mattila, 2012. "The Role of Fashion in the Characters of Online Games," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 81-88.
    8. Weerachet “Pitch†Sinlapanuntakul & Jessyca L. Derby & Barbara S. Chaparro, 2022. "Understanding the Effects of Mixed Reality on Video Game Satisfaction, Enjoyment, and Performance," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(3), pages 237-252, June.
    9. Chao Wang & Qiuqin Zheng & Haimei Zeng & Riwen Lai & Anxin Xu, 2023. "Can Anthropomorphic Slogans Awaken Tourists’ Environmental Responsibility Behavior? Experimental Study Based on Frame Effect Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    10. Lee, Seonjeong (Ally) & Oh, Haemoon, 2021. "Anthropomorphism and its implications for advertising hotel brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 455-464.
    11. Li, Yaoqi & Zhang, Chun & Laroche, Michel, 2019. "Is beauty a premium? A study of the physical attractiveness effect in service encounters," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 215-225.
    12. Muning Chang, 2021. "Association rules in mobile game operation," International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 254-267.
    13. Pankaj Aggarwal & Ann L. Mcgill, 2012. "When Brands Seem Human, Do Humans Act Like Brands? Automatic Behavioral Priming Effects of Brand Anthropomorphism," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 307-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharma, Monika & Rahman, Zillur, 2022. "Anthropomorphic brand management: An integrated review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 463-475.
    2. Golossenko, Artyom & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Aroean, Lukman, 2020. "Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 737-755.
    3. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "Warmth or competence: Brand anthropomorphism, social exclusion, and advertisement effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Sandra Awanis & Bodo B Schlegelmilch & Charles Chi Cui, 2017. "Asia’s materialists: Reconciling collectivism and materialism," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(8), pages 964-991, October.
    5. Gretry, Anaïs & Horváth, Csilla & Belei, Nina & van Riel, Allard C.R., 2017. "“Don't pretend to be my friend!” When an informal brand communication style backfires on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-89.
    6. Jamel Khenfer & Steven Shepherd & Olivier Trendel, 2020. "Customer empowerment in the face of perceived Incompetence: Effect on preference for anthropomorphized brands," Post-Print hal-03189338, HAL.
    7. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    8. Huang, Jingya & Wang, Liangyan & Chan, Eugene, 2024. "When does anthropomorphism hurt? How tool anthropomorphism negatively affects consumers' rewards for tool users," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Sunyee Yoon & Hyeongmin Christian Kim & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Simona BottiAssociate Editor, 2018. "Feeling Economically Stuck: The Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility and Socioeconomic Status on Variety Seeking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1141-1156.
    10. Xie, Yi & Chen, Ke & Guo, Xiaoling, 2020. "Online anthropomorphism and consumers’ privacy concern: Moderating roles of need for interaction and social exclusion," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Sara Kim & Rocky Peng Chen & Ke Zhang, 2016. "Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 282-302.
    12. Chen, Tong & Razzaq, Amar & Qing, Ping & Cao, Binbin, 2021. "Do you bear to reject them? The effect of anthropomorphism on empathy and consumer preference for unattractive produce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Kim, Sang Jin & Kim, Kyung Hoon & Choi, Jeonghye, 2019. "The Role of Design Innovation in Understanding Purchase Behavior of Augmented Products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 354-362.
    14. Jamel Khenfer & Steven Shepherd & Olivier Trendel, 2020. "Customer empowerment in the face of perceived Incompetence: Effect on preference for anthropomorphized brands," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03189338, HAL.
    15. Khenfer, Jamel & Shepherd, Steven & Trendel, Olivier, 2020. "Customer empowerment in the face of perceived Incompetence: Effect on preference for anthropomorphized brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Küper, Inken & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Is sharing up for sale? Monetary exchanges in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 223-234.
    17. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    18. Holmqvist, Jonas & Lunardo, Renaud, 2015. "The impact of an exciting store environment on consumer pleasure and shopping intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 117-119.
    19. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Retail shopper confusion: Conceptualization, scale development, and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3459-3467.
    20. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241265322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.