IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v53y2022i3p237-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Effects of Mixed Reality on Video Game Satisfaction, Enjoyment, and Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Weerachet “Pitch†Sinlapanuntakul
  • Jessyca L. Derby
  • Barbara S. Chaparro

Abstract

Background With the rising demand for the use and application of modern immersive technologies, recent studies have investigated the user experience of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) for video game purposes. Despite AR's and VR's pervasiveness in the video game industry, research studies into the effects of mixed reality (MR) on video game experience are scarce. This study examined the impact of MR on video game satisfaction, enjoyment, and user performance of first-time users. Method Participants played the same strategy video game across two platforms, an MR headset and a mobile device. A short version of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (GUESS-18) and the Enjoyment scale (ENJOY) were used to measure satisfaction and enjoyment. Results Results demonstrated that MR provided greater overall satisfaction, engrossment, creativity, and personal gratification. In addition, results revealed higher overall enjoyment, challenge/improvement, and engagement in the MR condition. Interestingly, participants performed better with the mobile version. No statistical differences were found between the conditions regarding the GUESS's usability, audio aesthetics, visual aesthetics, and the ENJOY's pleasure and competence. Conclusion The study provides insight into how MR influences satisfaction and enjoyment for video games. Playing a video game in mixed reality has the potential to enhance the user experience of game players despite the possibility of simulator sickness and worse performance than traditional mobile environments. Features of the gameplay that enhanced as well as diminished video game experience are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Weerachet “Pitch†Sinlapanuntakul & Jessyca L. Derby & Barbara S. Chaparro, 2022. "Understanding the Effects of Mixed Reality on Video Game Satisfaction, Enjoyment, and Performance," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(3), pages 237-252, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:3:p:237-252
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781221094473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781221094473
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781221094473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javornik, Ana, 2016. "Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 252-261.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    2. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    4. Park, Minjung & Yoo, Jungmin, 2020. "Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Kim, Do Yuon & Lee, Ha Kyung & Chung, Kyunghwa, 2023. "Avatar-mediated experience in the metaverse: The impact of avatar realism on user-avatar relationship," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Lena Steinhoff & Denni Arli & Scott Weaven & Irina V. Kozlenkova, 2019. "Online relationship marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 369-393, May.
    7. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Turner, Frances & Merle, Aurélie & Gotteland, David, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 473-483.
    9. Aslam, Usman & Davis, Leon, 2024. "Analyzing consumer expectations and experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) apps in the fashion retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Huang, Yung-Chuan, 2023. "Integrated concepts of the UTAUT and TPB in virtual reality behavioral intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Omar, Suha & Mohsen, Kholoud & Tsimonis, Georgios & Oozeerally, Adam & Hsu, Jen-Hsien, 2021. "M-commerce: The nexus between mobile shopping service quality and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Choon Ching Ng & Chandrashekar Ramasamy, 2018. "Augmented Reality Marketing in Malaysia—Future Scenarios," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Tim Hilken & Ko de Ruyter & Mathew Chylinski & Dominik Mahr & Debbie I. Keeling, 2017. "Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 884-905, November.
    14. Hwang, Angel Hsing-Chi & Oh, Jeeyun, 2020. "Interacting with background music engages E-Customers more: The impact of interactive music on consumer perception and behavioral intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Dehghani, Milad & Lee, Seung Hwan (Mark) & Mashatan, Atefeh, 2020. "Touching holograms with windows mixed reality: Renovating the consumer retailing services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Konstantina Sdravopoulou & Juan Manuel Muñoz González & María Dolores Hidalgo-Ariza, 2021. "Educating Adults with a Location-Based Augmented Reality Game: A Content Analysis Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Silvia Cachero-Martínez & Rodolfo Vázquez-Casielles, 2018. "Developing the Marketing Experience to Increase Shopping Time: The Moderating Effect of Visit Frequency," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Pathak, Kanishka & Prakash, Gyan, 2023. "Exploring the role of augmented reality in purchase intention: Through flow and immersive experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Qin, Hong & Peak, Daniel Alan & Prybutok, Victor, 2021. "A virtual market in your pocket: How does mobile augmented reality (MAR) influence consumer decision making?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    20. Chylinski, Mathew & Heller, Jonas & Hilken, Tim & Keeling, Debbie Isobel & Mahr, Dominik & de Ruyter, Ko, 2020. "Augmented reality marketing: A technology-enabled approach to situated customer experience," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 374-384.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:3:p:237-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.