IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221101040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Antecedents of E-Government Adoption: A Case of the Ghanaian Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • John Coffie Azamela
  • Zhiwei Tang
  • Owusu Ackah
  • Swanzy Awozum

Abstract

For decades, E-government has been integrated into the governance aspect of developed and developing economies. Its adoption enabled public officials and agencies to discharge their functions and make data-driven decisions in an equitable and timely manner. Literature however is limited in terms of explaining the cognitive and attitudinal factors that contribute to the adoption and utilization of e-government systems and platforms. This study contributes to the ongoing discussions by means of exploring behavioral factors that could influence individuals’ attitudes and behavior toward e-government adoption. The study utilized the theory of planned behavior to assess the psychological and cognitive influencers that elicit the attitude and behavior of employees toward the use of the new technology. The case study was conducted among the public sector institutions in Ghana. The structural model connecting the variables in the study was examined using Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Model (SEM) techniques. Findings from the study indicate that subjective norms and attitudes have a significant effect on individuals’ behavioral intentions. However, perceived behavioral control was found not to have a significant effect on the behavioral intentions of employees as suggested by previous studies. Although the findings contribute to theory by elucidating which components of the theory of planned behavior truly impact individuals’ attitudes and mental models, it pays limited attention to the role of cultural dynamics and how it can influence the behavioral intentions of individuals. This can be addressed in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • John Coffie Azamela & Zhiwei Tang & Owusu Ackah & Swanzy Awozum, 2022. "Assessing the Antecedents of E-Government Adoption: A Case of the Ghanaian Public Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221101040
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221101040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221101040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221101040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew H. T. Yap & Nan Chen, 2017. "Understanding young Chinese wine consumers through innovation diffusion theory," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 23(1), pages 51-68, May.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Spielmann, Nathalie & Kahle, Lynn R. & Kim, Chung-Hyun, 2018. "The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 400-408.
    4. Rydval, Ondrej & Ortmann, Andreas, 2004. "How financial incentives and cognitive abilities affect task performance in laboratory settings: an illustration," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 315-320, December.
    5. Han, Heesup & Hsu, Li-Tzang (Jane) & Sheu, Chwen, 2010. "Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 325-334.
    6. Adam, Ibrahim Osman, 2020. "Examining E-Government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Kaba, Bangaly, 2018. "Modeling information and communication technology use continuance behavior: Are there differences between users on basis of their status?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 77-85.
    8. Yueping Zheng & Hindy Lauer Schachter, 2017. "Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Use: the Role of Perceived Advantages," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 409-428, September.
    9. Peter Adjei-Bamfo & Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh & Justice Nyigmah Bawole & Albert Ahenkan & Theophilus Maloreh-Nyamekye & Stephanie Adjei-Bamfo & Samuel Antwi Darkwah, 2020. "An e-government framework for assessing readiness for public sector e-procurement in a lower-middle income country," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 742-761, October.
    10. A. Fayolle & B. Gailly, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Intention: Hysteresis and Persistence," Post-Print halshs-00785012, HAL.
    11. Isaac Kofi Mensah & Jianing Mi, 2018. "Determinants of Intention to Use Local E-Government Services in Ghana: The Perspective of Local Government Workers," International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 41-60, April.
    12. Tsai, Juin-Ming & Cheng, Min-Jhih & Tsai, Her-Her & Hung, Shiu-Wan & Chen, Ya-Ling, 2019. "Acceptance and resistance of telehealth: The perspective of dual-factor concepts in technology adoption," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 34-44.
    13. Alain Fayolle & Benoit Gailly, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Intention: Hysteresis and Persistence," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 75-93, January.
    14. Alain Fayolle & Benoît Gailly, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Intention : Hysteresis and Persistence," Post-Print hal-02312771, HAL.
    15. Shijing Yang & Yikun Su & Wei Wang & Kaicheng Hua, 2019. "Research on Developers’ Green Procurement Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonuç Zorali & Kamil Kanipek, 2023. "An Empirical Research on the Determination of Effective Factors in E-Government Acceptance and Use: Northern Cyprus Case," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Padilla-Angulo & René Díaz-Pichardo & Antonio Luis Leal-Rodríguez, 2023. "Are different entrepreneurship-promotion activities equally effective? an analysis by academic year and gender," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Xin-Hai Wang & Xiang You & Hsuan-Po Wang & Bo Wang & Wen-Ya Lai & Nanguang Su, 2023. "The Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intention: Mediation of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Moderating Model of Psychological Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Bohlayer, Carina & Gielnik, Michael M., 2023. "(S)training experiences: Toward understanding decreases in entrepreneurial self-efficacy during action-oriented entrepreneurship training," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1).
    4. Tendai Douglas Svotwa & Olumide Jaiyeoba & Mornay Roberts-Lombard & Charles Makanyeza, 2022. "Perceived Access to Finance, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy, Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Ability, and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Botswana Youth Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    5. Juan-José Nájera-Sánchez & Cristina Pérez-Pérez & Thais González-Torres, 2023. "Exploring the knowledge structure of entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 563-597, June.
    6. Entrialgo M. & Iglesias V., 2018. "Are the Intentions to Entrepreneurship of Men and Women Shaped Differently? The Impact of Entrepreneurial Role-Model Exposure and Entrepreneurship Education," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Wu, Ziqi & Xiao, Yi & Zhang, Jian & Wu, Jingyi, 2024. "Justice Reform and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1190-1203.
    8. Ben Youssef, Adel & Boubaker, Sabri & Dedaj, But & Carabregu-Vokshi, Mjellma, 2021. "Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Nathalie Duval-Couetil & Michael Ladisch & Soohyun Yi, 2021. "Addressing academic researcher priorities through science and technology entrepreneurship education," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 288-318, April.
    10. Natalie Brüne & Eva Lutz, 2020. "The effect of entrepreneurship education in schools on entrepreneurial outcomes: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 275-305, May.
    11. Colin Donaldson, 2019. "Intentions resurrected: a systematic review of entrepreneurial intention research from 2014 to 2018 and future research agenda," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 953-975, September.
    12. Lizette Huezo-Ponce & Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2021. "Emotional competencies and entrepreneurship: modeling universities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1497-1519, September.
    13. Aurora A. C. Teixeira & Rosa Portela Forte, 2017. "Prior education and entrepreneurial intentions: the differential impact of a wide range of fields of study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 353-394, March.
    14. Takawira Munyaradzi Ndofirepi, 2022. "Entrepreneurship goal and implementation intentions formation: the role of higher education institutions and contexts," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Carissa Tibia Walidayni & Dina Dellyana & Evy Rachmawati Chaldun, 2023. "Towards SDGs 4 and 8: How Value Co-Creation Affecting Entrepreneurship Education’s Quality and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Wiklund, Johan & Yu, Wei & Tucker, Reginald & Marino, Louis D., 2017. "ADHD, impulsivity and entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 627-656.
    17. Djoko Dwi Kusumojanto & Bagus Shandy Narmaditya & Agus Wibowo, 2020. "Does entrepreneurial education drive students' being entrepreneurs? Evidence from Indonesia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 454-466, December.
    18. Susana Lin & Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero & José Luis Montes Botella & Cristina Lin-Lian, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Intention of Chinese Students Studying at Universities in the Community of Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Gry Alsos & Gustav Hägg & Mats Lundqvist & Diamanto Politis & Martin Stockhaus & Karen Williams-Middleton & Kari Djupdal, 2023. "Graduates of venture creation programs – where do they apply their entrepreneurial competencies?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 133-155, January.
    20. Asim Nasar & Suzilawati Kamarudin & Adriana Mohd Rizal & Vu Thi Bich Ngoc & Samar Mohammad Shoaib, 2019. "Short-Term and Long-Term Entrepreneurial Intention Comparison between Pakistan and Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221101040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.