IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221099516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of Self-Regulation Mechanisms in Peer-Rejected Students

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Hladik
  • Karla Hrbackova
  • Anna Petr Safrankova

Abstract

Self-regulation is a process that may affect the degree of peer rejection but may also be determined by the degree of peer rejection, whereby the degree of acceptance/rejection can influence the processes that lead to the strengthening or weakening of self-regulation. In this study, we concentrate on self-regulatory mechanisms (self-regulated behavior and strategies for emotional regulation) in peer-rejected students compared to non-rejected students. With the aid of structural equation modeling, we identified models of self-regulation mechanisms in three groups of students according to their acceptance/rejection. These groups differ in the degree of peer rejection, the structure of the regulation of emotional relations, and the degree of self-regulation behavior. The results suggest that peer-rejected students do not form a monolithic group from the perspective of self-regulation mechanisms, as it is possible to identify diverse structures of relations between the self-regulation mechanisms that probably depend, inter alia, on the degree of peer rejection.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Hladik & Karla Hrbackova & Anna Petr Safrankova, 2022. "Models of Self-Regulation Mechanisms in Peer-Rejected Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099516
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221099516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221099516
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221099516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hladik, Jakub & Hrbackova, Karla, 2021. "Peer-rejected students: An analysis of their self-regulatory mechanisms," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Gokmen Arslan & Erdinc Duru, 2017. "Initial Development and Validation of the School Belongingness Scale," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(4), pages 1043-1058, December.
    3. Gokmen Arslan & Erdinc Duru, 2017. "Erratum to: Initial Development and Validation of the School Belongingness Scale," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(4), pages 1059-1059, December.
    4. Louro, M.J.S. & Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M., 2007. "Dynamics of multiple goal pursuit," Other publications TiSEM fcfc1f8f-6eae-41bb-af23-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gökmen Arslan & Kelly-Ann Allen, 2021. "School Victimization, School Belongingness, Psychological Well-Being, and Emotional Problems in Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(4), pages 1501-1517, August.
    2. Gökmen Arslan & Kelly-Ann Allen & Tracii Ryan, 2020. "Exploring the Impacts of School Belonging on Youth Wellbeing and Mental Health among Turkish Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1619-1635, October.
    3. Adekunle Adedeji & Tosin Tunrayo Olonisakin & Johanna Buchcik & Erhabor S. Idemudia, 2023. "Socioeconomic status and social capital as predictors of happiness: evidence and gender differences," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Murat Yıldırım & Hacer Yıldırım-Kurtuluş & Hasan Batmaz & Emin Kurtuluş, 2023. "School Belongingness and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems in Adolescents: Exploring the Influence of Meaningful School," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(5), pages 2125-2140, October.
    5. Anastasiya Pocheptsova & Francine Espinoza Petersen & Jordan Etkin, 2014. "Two birds, one stone? Positive mood makes products seem less useful for multiple-goal pursuit," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-14-06, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    6. Simona Cicognani & Sebastian Stein & Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2023. "Symbolic incentives and the recruitment of volunteers for citizen science projects," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 923-940.
    7. Evan Weingarten & Sudeep Bhatia & Barbara Mellers, 2019. "Multiple Goals as Reference Points: One Failure Makes Everything Else Feel Worse," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3337-3352, July.
    8. Marli Gonan Božac & Katarina Kostelić, 2021. "HR Managers’ Emotions in Strategic Decision-Making Events: Evidence from Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Andrew T. Ching & Masakazu Ishihara, 2018. "Identification of Dynamic Models of Rewards Programme," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 69(3), pages 306-323, September.
    10. Paulo B. Goes & Chenhui Guo & Mingfeng Lin, 2016. "Do Incentive Hierarchies Induce User Effort? Evidence from an Online Knowledge Exchange," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 497-516, September.
    11. Scott G Wallace & Jordan Etkin & Johar GitaEditor & Rajesh BagchiAssociate Editor, 2018. "How Goal Specificity Shapes Motivation: A Reference Points Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1033-1051.
    12. Ricci, Michael A., 2022. "How better client service performance affects auditors' willingness to challenge management's preferred accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Guglielmo Briscese & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis & Mirco Tonin, 2020. "Compliance with Covid-19 Social-Distancing Measures in Italy: The Role of Expectations and Duration," CESifo Working Paper Series 8182, CESifo.
    14. Chris Janiszewski & Aparna A. Labroo & Derek D. Rucker, 2016. "A Tutorial in Consumer Research: Knowledge Creation and Knowledge Appreciation in Deductive-Conceptual Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 200-209.
    15. Wright, Scott A. & Schultz, Ainslie E., 2022. "Too gritty to indulge: Grit and indulgent food choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 173-183.
    16. Huang, Szu-chi & Jin, Liyin & Zhang, Ying, 2017. "Step by step: Sub-goals as a source of motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-15.
    17. G. A. Verhaert & D. Van Den Poel, 2012. "The Role of Seed Money and Threshold Size in Optimizing Fundraising Campaigns: Past Behavior Matters!," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/815, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    18. Matthew C. Davis & Kerrie L. Unsworth & Sally V. Russell & Jennifer J. Galvan, 2020. "Can green behaviors really be increased for all employees? Trade‐offs for “deep greens” in a goal‐oriented green human resource management intervention," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 335-346, February.
    19. Franziska Neumann, 2017. "Antecedents and effects of emotions in strategic decision-making: a literature review and conceptual model," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 175-200, June.
    20. Hsiaw, Alice, 2018. "Goal bracketing and self-control," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 100-121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.