IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v16y2015i3p369-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring citizens’ implicit and explicit attitudes towards the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Maier
  • Jürgen Maier
  • Anna Baumert
  • Nico Jahn
  • Stefan Krause
  • Silke Adam

Abstract

Studies assessing citizens’ attitudes towards Europe have mostly used explicit concepts and measures. However, psychologists have shown that human behaviour is not only determined by explicit attitudes which can be assessed via self-report, but also by implicit attitudes which require indirect measurement. We combine a self-report questionnaire with an implicit Affective Misattribution Procedure for the first time in an online environment to estimate the reliability, validity and predictive power of this implicit measure for the explanation of European Union-skeptical behaviour. Based on a survey with a sample representative for Germany, we found evidence for good reliability and validity of the implicit measure. In addition, the implicit attitude had a significant incremental impact beyond explicit attitudes on citizens’ proneness to engage in EU-skeptical information and voting behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Maier & Jürgen Maier & Anna Baumert & Nico Jahn & Stefan Krause & Silke Adam, 2015. "Measuring citizens’ implicit and explicit attitudes towards the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 369-385, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:16:y:2015:i:3:p:369-385
    DOI: 10.1177/1465116515577454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116515577454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1465116515577454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malte Friese & Colin Tucker Smith & Thomas Plischke & Matthias Bluemke & Brian A Nosek, 2012. "Do Implicit Attitudes Predict Actual Voting Behavior Particularly for Undecided Voters?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Marc Debus, 2009. "Pre-electoral commitments and government formation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 45-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giancarlo Manzi & Sonia Stefanizzi & Pier Alda Ferrari, 2016. "In the end, will we all be Europeans? A two-phase analysis of citizens’ sentiment towards the EU," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2535-2551, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Plastria & Tom Blockmans, 2015. "Multidimensional Theoretic Consensus Reachability: The Impact of Distance Selection and Issue Saliences," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-44, January.
    2. Klebolte, Kimberly, 2019. "Aspekte der Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung – Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Einfluss von Attraktivität, Expertise und Prominenz," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 4(4), pages 524-552.
    3. Samuele Murtinu & Giulio Piccirilli & Agnese Sacchi, 2022. "Rational inattention and politics: how parties use fiscal policies to manipulate voters," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 365-386, March.
    4. Lewis, Blane D. & Hendrawan, Adrianus, 2019. "The impact of majority coalitions on local government spending, service delivery, and corruption in Indonesia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 178-191.
    5. Livio Raccuia, 2016. "Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Shin, Euncheol, 2019. "A model of pre-electoral coalition formation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 463-485.
    7. Michael Herrmann, 2014. "Polls, coalitions and strategic voting under proportional representation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(3), pages 442-467, July.
    8. Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay & Kalyan Chatterjee & Tomas Sjöström, 2013. "Pre-electoral Coalitions and Post-election Bargaining," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Bargaining in the Shadow of the Market Selected Papers on Bilateral and Multilateral Bargaining, chapter 7, pages 129-181, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik T. & Tejada, Oriol, 2019. "Coalition preclusion contracts and moderate policies," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 28-46.
    10. Blane D. Lewis & Adrianus Hendrawan, 2018. "The impact of mayor-council coalitions on local government spending, service delivery, and corruption in Indonesia," Departmental Working Papers 2018-19, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    11. Tom Blockmans & Marie-Anne Guerry, 2016. "Coalition Formation Procedures: The Impact of Issue Saliences and Consensus Estimation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 481-499, May.
    12. Rafael Hortala-Vallve & Jaakko Meriläinen & Janne Tukiainen, 2024. "Pre-electoral coalitions and the distribution of political power," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 47-67, January.
    13. Danielle Resnick, 2011. "Are Electoral Coalitions Harmful for Democratic Consolidation in Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series 007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. David Baron & Alexander Hirsch, 2012. "Common agency lobbying over coalitions and policy," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 49(3), pages 639-681, April.
    15. Nataliya Demyanenko & Pierfrancesco Mura, 2023. "Gamson–Shapley Laws: a formal approach to parliamentary coalition formation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay & Kalyan Chatterjee & Tomas Sjöström, 2013. "Pre-electoral Coalitions and Post-election Bargaining," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Bargaining in the Shadow of the Market Selected Papers on Bilateral and Multilateral Bargaining, chapter 7, pages 129-181, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Danielle Resnick, 2011. "Are Electoral Coalitions Harmful for Democratic Consolidation in Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Marc Debus & Jochen Müller & Peter Obert, 2011. "Europeanization and government formation in multi-level systems: Evidence from the Czech Republic," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(3), pages 381-403, September.
    19. Jet G Sanders & Rob Jenkins, 2016. "Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Yaoshan Xu & Yongjuan Li & Weidong Ding & Fan Lu, 2014. "Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:16:y:2015:i:3:p:369-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.