IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v24y2015i1d10.1007_s10726-014-9378-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional Theoretic Consensus Reachability: The Impact of Distance Selection and Issue Saliences

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Plastria

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

  • Tom Blockmans

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

Abstract

This article addresses the estimation of consensus positions in multidimensional coalition formation models. In search of consistency in the model assumptions and inspired by location theory, three types of consensus positions are considered all obtained by minimising a weighted sum of distances to the parties’ ideal policy positions, using respectively the squared Euclidean, Euclidean and rectangular distance functions. Particular attention is payed to inclusion of issue saliences, representing the parties’ policy priorities. Properties, uniqueness and calculation of the corresponding consensus positions are discussed. We investigate in particular the range of consensus positions reachable by each model when saliences are varied.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Plastria & Tom Blockmans, 2015. "Multidimensional Theoretic Consensus Reachability: The Impact of Distance Selection and Issue Saliences," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9378-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9378-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-014-9378-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-014-9378-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annelies De Ridder & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2008. "On Some Procedures of Forming a Multipartner Alliance," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 443-487, June.
    2. Marc Debus, 2009. "Pre-electoral commitments and government formation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 45-64, January.
    3. E. Weiszfeld & Frank Plastria, 2009. "On the point for which the sum of the distances to n given points is minimum," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 7-41, March.
    4. Pelegrin, Blas & Michelot, Christian & Plastria, Frank, 1985. "On the uniqueness of optimal solutions in continuous location theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 327-331, June.
    5. Laver, Michael & Shepsle, Kenneth A., 1990. "Coalitions and Cabinet Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 873-890, September.
    6. Milyo, Jeffrey, 2000. "Logical Deficiencies in Spatial Models: A Constructive Critique," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 105(3-4), pages 273-289, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom Blockmans & Marie-Anne Guerry, 2016. "Coalition Formation Procedures: The Impact of Issue Saliences and Consensus Estimation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 481-499, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plastria, Frank, 2016. "How bad can the centroid be?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 98-102.
    2. Tom Blockmans & Marie-Anne Guerry, 2016. "Coalition Formation Procedures: The Impact of Issue Saliences and Consensus Estimation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 481-499, May.
    3. Danielle Resnick, 2011. "Are Electoral Coalitions Harmful for Democratic Consolidation in Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series 007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Danielle Resnick, 2011. "Are Electoral Coalitions Harmful for Democratic Consolidation in Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Tom Blockmans & Marie-Anne Guerry, 2015. "Probabilistic Spatial Power Indexes: The Impact of Issue Saliences and Distance Selection," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 675-697, July.
    6. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    7. Daniel Diermeier & Hulya Eraslan & Antonio Merlo, 2003. "The Effects of Constitutions on Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies," PIER Working Paper Archive 03-037, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    8. Antonio Merlo, 2005. "Whither Political Economy? Theories, Facts and Issues," PIER Working Paper Archive 05-033, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 Dec 2005.
    9. Jiwon Baik & Alan T. Murray, 2022. "Locating a facility to simultaneously address access and coverage goals," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1199-1217, October.
    10. Donald Wittman, 2005. "Valence characteristics, costly policy and the median-crossing property: A diagrammatic exposition," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 365-382, September.
    11. Thomas Fujiwara & Carlos Sanz, 2017. "Norms in bargaining: evidence from government formation in Spain," Working Papers 1741, Banco de España.
    12. Amir Beck & Shoham Sabach, 2015. "Weiszfeld’s Method: Old and New Results," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-40, January.
    13. Stefan Nickel & Justo Puerto & Antonio M. Rodriguez-Chia, 2003. "An Approach to Location Models Involving Sets as Existing Facilities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 693-715, November.
    14. Samuele Murtinu & Giulio Piccirilli & Agnese Sacchi, 2022. "Rational inattention and politics: how parties use fiscal policies to manipulate voters," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 365-386, March.
    15. Nguyen Mau Nam & Nguyen Hoang & Nguyen Thai An, 2014. "Constructions of Solutions to Generalized Sylvester and Fermat–Torricelli Problems for Euclidean Balls," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 483-509, February.
    16. Moshe Maor, 1995. "Intra-Party Determinants of Coalition Bargaining," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 7(1), pages 65-91, January.
    17. Göhrs, Max & Hubo, Christiane & Krott, Max, 2021. "Partisan theory in forest nature conservation policy: Empirical evidence based on four German conflict issues," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. David Degras, 2021. "Sparse group fused lasso for model segmentation: a hybrid approach," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(3), pages 625-671, September.
    19. Simeon Reich & Truong Minh Tuyen, 2023. "The Generalized Fermat–Torricelli Problem in Hilbert Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 78-97, January.
    20. Diermeier, Daniel & Merlo, Antonio, 2000. "Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 46-79, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9378-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.