IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0136057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging

Author

Listed:
  • Chloe Bracis
  • Eliezer Gurarie
  • Bram Van Moorter
  • R Andrew Goodwin

Abstract

An individual’s choices are shaped by its experience, a fundamental property of behavior important to understanding complex processes. Learning and memory are observed across many taxa and can drive behaviors, including foraging behavior. To explore the conditions under which memory provides an advantage, we present a continuous-space, continuous-time model of animal movement that incorporates learning and memory. Using simulation models, we evaluate the benefit memory provides across several types of landscapes with variable-quality resources and compare the memory model within a nested hierarchy of simpler models (behavioral switching and random walk). We find that memory almost always leads to improved foraging success, but that this effect is most marked in landscapes containing sparse, contiguous patches of high-value resources that regenerate relatively fast and are located in an otherwise devoid landscape. In these cases, there is a large payoff for finding a resource patch, due to size, value, or locational difficulty. While memory-informed search is difficult to differentiate from other factors using solely movement data, our results suggest that disproportionate spatial use of higher value areas, higher consumption rates, and consumption variability all point to memory influencing the movement direction of animals in certain ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Chloe Bracis & Eliezer Gurarie & Bram Van Moorter & R Andrew Goodwin, 2015. "Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0136057
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136057
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136057&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0136057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devin S. Johnson & Dana L. Thomas & Jay M. Ver Hoef & Aaron Christ, 2008. "A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 968-976, September.
    2. Hothorn, Torsten & Hornik, Kurt & van de Wiel, Mark A. & Zeileis, Achim, 2006. "A Lego System for Conditional Inference," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 60, pages 257-263, August.
    3. Watkins, Katherine Shepard & Rose, Kenneth A., 2013. "Evaluating the performance of individual-based animal movement models in novel environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 214-234.
    4. Esposito, S. & Incerti, G. & Giannino, F. & Russo, D. & Mazzoleni, S., 2010. "Integrated modelling of foraging behaviour, energy budget and memory properties," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(9), pages 1283-1291.
    5. Gautestad, Arild O. & Mysterud, Ivar, 2010. "Spatial memory, habitat auto-facilitation and the emergence of fractal home range patterns," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2741-2750.
    6. Avgar, Tal & Deardon, Rob & Fryxell, John M., 2013. "An empirically parameterized individual based model of animal movement, perception, and memory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 158-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diaz, Stephanie G. & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Gaines, Michael S. & Purdon, Andrew & Mole, Michael A. & van Aarde, Rudi J., 2021. "Development and validation of a spatially-explicit agent-based model for space utilization by African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) based on determinants of movement," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 447(C).
    2. Tardy, Olivia & Lenglos, Christophe & Lai, Sandra & Berteaux, Dominique & Leighton, Patrick A., 2023. "Rabies transmission in the Arctic: An agent-based model reveals the effects of broad-scale movement strategies on contact risk between Arctic foxes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    3. Theng, Meryl & Prowse, Thomas A.A. & Delean, Steven & Cassey, Phillip & Bracis, Chloe, 2024. "Integrating resource memory and cue-based territoriality to simulate movement dynamics: a process-explicit and pattern-oriented approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 487(C).
    4. Nauta, Johannes & Simoens, Pieter & Khaluf, Yara, 2022. "Group size and resource fractality drive multimodal search strategies: A quantitative analysis on group foraging," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 590(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chimienti, Marianna & Desforges, Jean-Pierre & Beumer, Larissa T. & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & van Beest, Floris M. & Schmidt, Niels Martin, 2020. "Energetics as common currency for integrating high resolution activity patterns into dynamic energy budget-individual based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    2. Vergara, Pablo M. & Saura, Santiago & Pérez-Hernández, Christian G. & Soto, Gerardo E., 2015. "Hierarchical spatial decisions in fragmented landscapes: Modeling the foraging movements of woodpeckers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 114-122.
    3. Svetlana V. Tishkovskaya & Paul G. Blackwell, 2021. "Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    4. Watkins, Katherine Shepard & Rose, Kenneth A., 2017. "Simulating individual-based movement in dynamic environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 59-72.
    5. Tomáš Želinský, 2015. "Nekonzistentnosť časových preferencií ľudí z arginalizovaných rómskych komunít [On inconsistency of time preferences of people from the marginalised roma communities]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 204-222.
    6. Katherine A. Zeller & David W. Wattles & Javan M. Bauder & Stephen DeStefano, 2020. "Forecasting Seasonal Habitat Connectivity in a Developing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. repec:jss:jstsof:36:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Georgina Milne & Andrew William Byrne & Emma Campbell & Jordon Graham & John McGrath & Raymond Kirke & Wilma McMaster & Jesko Zimmermann & Adewale Henry Adenuga, 2022. "Quantifying Land Fragmentation in Northern Irish Cattle Enterprises," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. James C. Russell & Ephraim M. Hanks & Murali Haran, 2016. "Dynamic Models of Animal Movement with Spatial Point Process Interactions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 22-40, March.
    10. Lutnesky, Marvin M.F. & Brown, Thomas R., 2015. "Simulation of movement that potentially maximizes assessment, presence, and defense in territorial animals with varying movement strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 50-58.
    11. Fulford, Richard S. & Tolan, Jessica L. & Hagy, James D., 2024. "Simulating implications of fish behavioral response for managing hypoxia in estuaries with spatial dissolved oxygen variability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    12. Fulford, R.S. & Peterson, M.S. & Wu, W. & Grammer, P.O., 2014. "An ecological model of the habitat mosaic in estuarine nursery areas: Part II—Projecting effects of sea level rise on fish production," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 96-108.
    13. Zhang, Jingjing & Dennis, Todd E. & Landers, Todd J. & Bell, Elizabeth & Perry, George L.W., 2017. "Linking individual-based and statistical inferential models in movement ecology: A case study with black petrels (Procellaria parkinsoni)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 425-436.
    14. Thomas M Newsome & Guy-Anthony Ballard & Christopher R Dickman & Peter J S Fleming & Chris Howden, 2013. "Anthropogenic Resource Subsidies Determine Space Use by Australian Arid Zone Dingoes: An Improved Resource Selection Modelling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.
    15. Payton J. Jones & Patrick Mair & Thorsten Simon & Achim Zeileis, 2020. "Network Trees: A Method for Recursively Partitioning Covariance Structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 926-945, December.
    16. Politikos, Dimitrios V. & Huret, Martin & Petitgas, Pierre, 2015. "A coupled movement and bioenergetics model to explore the spawning migration of anchovy in the Bay of Biscay," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 212-222.
    17. Seibold Heidi & Zeileis Achim & Hothorn Torsten, 2016. "Model-Based Recursive Partitioning for Subgroup Analyses," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 45-63, May.
    18. Dhanushi A. Wijeyakulasuriya & Ephraim M. Hanks & Benjamin A. Shaby & Paul C. Cross, 2019. "Extreme Value-Based Methods for Modeling Elk Yearly Movements," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 73-91, March.
    19. Wells, Adam G. & Blair, Colby C. & Garton, Edward O. & Rice, Clifford G. & Horne, Jon S. & Rachlow, Janet L. & Wallin, David O., 2014. "The Brownian bridge synoptic model of habitat selection and space use for animals using GPS telemetry data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 242-250.
    20. McGinlay, James & Parsons, David J. & Morris, Joe & Hubatova, Marie & Graves, Anil & Bradbury, Richard B. & Bullock, James M., 2017. "Do charismatic species groups generate more cultural ecosystem service benefits?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 15-24.
    21. Marc Ditzhaus & Arnold Janssen, 2020. "Bootstrap and permutation rank tests for proportional hazards under right censoring," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 493-517, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0136057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.