IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0087389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Savell
  • Anna B Gilmore
  • Gary Fooks

Abstract

Background: The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control makes a number of recommendations aimed at restricting the marketing of tobacco products. Tobacco industry political activity has been identified as an obstacle to Parties’ development and implementation of these provisions. This study systematically reviews the existing literature on tobacco industry efforts to influence marketing regulations and develops taxonomies of 1) industry strategies and tactics and 2) industry frames and arguments. Methods: Searches were conducted between April-July 2011, and updated in March 2013. Articles were included if they made reference to tobacco industry efforts to influence marketing regulations; supported claims with verifiable evidence; were written in English; and concerned the period 1990–2013. 48 articles met the review criteria. Narrative synthesis was used to combine the evidence. Results: 56% of articles focused on activity in North America, Europe or Australasia, the rest focusing on Asia (17%), South America, Africa or transnational activity. Six main political strategies and four main frames were identified. The tobacco industry frequently claims that the proposed policy will have negative unintended consequences, that there are legal barriers to regulation, and that the regulation is unnecessary because, for example, industry does not market to youth or adheres to a voluntary code. The industry primarily conveys these arguments through direct and indirect lobbying, the promotion of voluntary codes and alternative policies, and the formation of alliances with other industrial sectors. The majority of tactics and arguments were used in multiple jurisdictions. Conclusions: Tobacco industry political activity is far more diverse than suggested by existing taxonomies of corporate political activity. Tactics and arguments are repeated across jurisdictions, suggesting that the taxonomies of industry tactics and arguments developed in this paper are generalisable to multiple jurisdictions and can be used to predict industry activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Savell & Anna B Gilmore & Gary Fooks, 2014. "How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0087389
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087389&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0087389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebrié, E.M. & Glantz, S.A., 2007. "Tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" programs to undermine meaningful tobacco control in Latin America," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(8), pages 1357-1367.
    2. Apollonio, D.E. & Malone, R.E., 2010. "The "we card" program: Tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" as industry self-preservation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(7), pages 1188-1201.
    3. Charlesworth, Annemarie & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2005. "Smoking in the Movies Increases Adolescent Smoking: A Review," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt9039p7cm, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. Sullivan BA, Sarah & Barnes, Richard L JD & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2009. "Shifting Attitudes Towards Tobacco Control in Tobacco Country: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in South Carolina," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt278790h5, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    5. Wakefield, M. & Terry-McElrath, Y. & Emery, S. & Saffer, H. & Chaloupka, F.J. & Szczypka, G. & Flay, B. & O'Malley, P.M. & Johnston, L.D., 2006. "Effect of televised, tobacco company - Funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(12), pages 2154-2160.
    6. Schooler, C. & Feighery, E. & Flora, J.A., 1996. "Seventh graders' self-reported exposure to cigarette marketing and its relationship to their smoking behavior," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(9), pages 1216-1221.
    7. McDaniel, Patricia & Malone, Ruth E, 2005. "Understanding Philip Morris's pursuit of US government regulation of tobacco," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt35p0r9x2, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    8. Mackey, T.K. & Liang, B.A. & Novotny, T.E., 2013. "Evolution of tobacco labeling and packaging: International legal considerations and health governance," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(4), pages 39-43.
    9. Ling, P.M. & Haber, L.A. & Wedl, S., 2010. "Branding the rodeo: A case study of tobacco sports sponsorship," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(1), pages 32-41.
    10. Lambert, A & Sargent, J D & Glantz, S A & Ling, P M, 2004. "How Philip Morris unlocked the Japanese cigarette market: lessons for global tobacco control," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt1rc3m86n, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    11. Lee, Chung-Yol MD, MPH & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2001. "The Tobacco Industry's Successful Efforts to Control Tobacco Policy Making in Switzerland," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt09t535s7, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    12. Ibrahim, Jennifer K. Ph.D. & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2003. "Tobacco Policy Making in California 2001-2003: No Longer Finishing First," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt037948rj, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    13. Sebrie, Ernesto M MD, MPH & Barnoya, Joaquin & Perez-Stable, Eliseo MD & Glantz, Stanton A PhD, 2005. "Tobacco Industry Successfully Prevented Tobacco Control Legislation in Argentina," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt8w0767r2, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    14. Dearlove, Joanna BA & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2000. "Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in New York 1983-1999," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt2t45x412, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    15. Tung, Gregory MPH & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2008. "Swimming Upstream: Tobacco Policy Making in Nevada," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt4fn8v32x, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    16. Risako Shirane & Katherine Smith & Hana Ross & Karin E Silver & Simon Williams & Anna Gilmore, 2012. "Tobacco Industry Manipulation of Tobacco Excise and Tobacco Advertising Policies in the Czech Republic: An Analysis of Tobacco Industry Documents," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Tsoukalas, Theodore H. Ph.D. & Ibrahim, Jennifer K. Ph.D. & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2003. "Shifting Tides: Minnesota Tobacco Politics," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt1wh17656, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    18. Welle, Jennifer R MPH & Ibrahim, Jennifer K. Ph.D. & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Tobacco Control Policy Making in North Dakota: A Tradition of Activism," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt9v58x8ps, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    19. Landman, A. & Glantz, S.A., 2009. "Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(1), pages 45-58.
    20. Katherine E Smith & Gary Fooks & Jeff Collin & Heide Weishaar & Sema Mandal & Anna B Gilmore, 2010. "“Working the System”—British American Tobacco's Influence on the European Union Treaty and Its Implications for Policy: An Analysis of Internal Tobacco Industry Documents," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, January.
    21. Epps-Johnson, BA, Tiana & Barnes, JD, Richard & Glantz, PhD, Stanton, 2009. "The Stars Aligned Over the Cornfields: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in Iowa 1897-2009," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt5dt9w35k, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    22. Washington, Michelle D. & Barnes, Richard L. & Glantz, Stanton A., 2012. "Good Start Out of the Gate: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policymaking in Kentucky 1936-2012," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt10k3p8m5, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    23. Mamudu, H.M. & Hammond, R. & Glantz, S.A., 2008. "Project Cerberus: Tobacco industry strategy to create an alternative to the framework convention on tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(9), pages 1630-1642.
    24. Lars Thorup Larsen, 2008. "The political impact of science: is tobacco control science- or policy-driven?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(10), pages 757-769, December.
    25. Landman, A. & Ling, P.M. & Glantz, S.A., 2002. "Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: Protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(6), pages 917-930.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda Hancock & Natalie Ralph & Florentine Petronella Martino, 2018. "Applying Corporate Political Activity (CPA) analysis to Australian gambling industry submissions against regulation of television sports betting advertising," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Mélissa Mialon & Eric Crosbie & Gary Sacks, 2020. "Mapping of food industry strategies to influence public health policy, research and practice in South Africa," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(7), pages 1027-1036, September.
    3. Valente, Thomas W. & Pitts, Stephanie & Wipfli, Heather & Vega Yon, George G., 2019. "Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 188-197.
    4. Eastmure, Elizabeth & Cummins, Steven & Sparks, Leigh, 2020. "Non-market strategy as a framework for exploring commercial involvement in health policy: A primer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. John C. Boik, 2016. "Optimality of Social Choice Systems: Complexity, Wisdom, and Wellbeing Centrality," Working Paper 0005, Principled Societies Project, revised Mar 2017.
    6. Patay, Dori & Schram, Ashley & Friel, Sharon, 2022. "The role of causal ideas in the governance of commercial determinants of health. A qualitative study of tobacco control in the pacific," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Jenny L Hatchard & Joao Quariguasi Frota Neto & Christos Vasilakis & Karen A Evans-Reeves, 2019. "Tweeting about public health policy: Social media response to the UK Government’s announcement of a Parliamentary vote on draft standardised packaging regulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Qing Xu & Joshua Yang & Michael R. Haupt & Mingxiang Cai & Matthew C. Nali & Tim K. Mackey, 2021. "Digital Surveillance to Identify California Alternative and Emerging Tobacco Industry Policy Influence and Mobilization on Facebook," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Florentine Petronella Martino & Peter Graeme Miller & Kerri Coomber & Linda Hancock & Kypros Kypri, 2017. "Analysis of Alcohol Industry Submissions against Marketing Regulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Ariel Bardach & Andrea Alcaraz & Javier Roberti & Agustín Ciapponi & Federico Augustovski & Andrés Pichon-Riviere, 2021. "Optimizing Tobacco Advertising Bans in Seven Latin American Countries: Microsimulation Modeling of Health and Financial Impact to Inform Evidence-Based Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Benjamin Wood & Gary Ruskin & Gary Sacks, 2020. "How Coca-Cola Shaped the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health: An Analysis of Email Exchanges between 2012 and 2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Rima Nakkash & Ahmed Ali & Hala Alaouie & Khalil Asmar & Norbert Hirschhorn & Sanaa Mugharbil & Iman Nuwayhid & Leslie London & Amina Saban & Sabina Faiz Rashid & Md Koushik Ahmed & Cecile Knai & Char, 2020. "Attitudes and practices of public health academics towards research funding from for-profit organizations: cross-sectional survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(7), pages 1133-1145, September.
    13. Tess Legg & Jenny Hatchard & Anna B Gilmore, 2021. "The Science for Profit Model—How and why corporations influence science and the use of science in policy and practice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Patricia A McDaniel & Ruth E Malone, 2020. "Tobacco industry and public health responses to state and local efforts to end tobacco sales from 1969-2020," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Gómez, Eduardo J., 2022. "Enhancing our understanding of the commercial determinants of health: Theories, methods, and insights from political science," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    16. Paibul Suriyawongpaisal & Roengrudee Patanavanich & Wichai Aekplakorn & Ignacio Martinez‐Moyano & Thanita Thongtan, 2021. "Paradox of sustainability in tobacco control in Thailand: A comprehensive assessment of three‐decade experiences," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 381-398, March.
    17. Scott, C. & Hawkins, B. & Knai, C., 2017. "Food and beverage product reformulation as a corporate political strategy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 37-45.
    18. Gary Sacks & Devorah Riesenberg & Melissa Mialon & Sarah Dean & Adrian J Cameron, 2020. "The characteristics and extent of food industry involvement in peer-reviewed research articles from 10 leading nutrition-related journals in 2018," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Chaufan, Claudia & Saliba, Daniel, 2019. "The global diabetes epidemic and the nonprofit state corporate complex: Equity implications of discourses, research agendas, and policy recommendations of diabetes nonprofit organizations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 77-88.
    20. MacKenzie, Ross & Mathers, Annalise & Hawkins, Benjamin & Eckhardt, Jappe & Smith, Julia, 2018. "The tobacco industry’s challenges to standardised packaging: A comparative analysis of issue framing in public relations campaigns in four countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 1001-1011.
    21. Hawkins, Benjamin & Durrance-Bagale, Anna & Walls, Helen, 2021. "Co-regulation and alcohol industry political strategy: A case study of the Public Health England-Drinkaware Drink Free Days Campaign," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    22. Julia Stafford & Tanya Chikritzhs & Hannah Pierce & Simone Pettigrew, 2021. "An evaluation of the evidence submitted to Australian alcohol advertising policy consultations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Fooks & Anna Gilmore & Jeff Collin & Chris Holden & Kelley Lee, 2013. "The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 283-299, January.
    2. Mamudu, Hadii M. & Hammond, Ross & Glantz, Stanton, 2008. "Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1690-1699, December.
    3. Hoek, Janet & Newcombe, Rhiannon & Walker, Sue, 2011. "Promoting youth smokefree behaviour: An evaluation of a social norms campaign," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 58-64.
    4. Patricia A McDaniel & E Anne Lown & Ruth E Malone, 2017. "“It doesn’t seem to make sense for a company that sells cigarettes to help smokers stop using them”: A case study of Philip Morris’s involvement in smoking cessation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Sullivan, Sarah & Glantz, Stanton, 2010. "The changing role of agriculture in tobacco control policymaking: A South Carolina case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1527-1534, October.
    6. Peter Fischer & Evelyn Vingilis & Tobias Greitemeyer & Claudia Vogrincic, 2011. "Risk‐Taking and the Media," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 699-705, May.
    7. Hiilamo, Heikki & Glantz, Stanton A., 2015. "Old wine in new bottles: Tobacco industry's submission to European Commission tobacco product directive public consultation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 57-65.
    8. Apollonio, Dorie E. & Glantz, Stanton A. & Bero, Lisa A., 2014. "Term limits and the tobacco industry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-5.
    9. Thomas Moore & Patrick Finley & Nancy Brodsky & Theresa Brown & Benjamin Apelberg & Bridget Ambrose & Robert Glass, 2015. "Modeling Education and Advertising with Opinion Dynamics," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(2), pages 1-7.
    10. Barraclough, Simon & Morrow, Martha, 2008. "A grim contradiction: The practice and consequences of corporate social responsibility by British American Tobacco in Malaysia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1784-1796, April.
    11. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2014. "On Self-Interest and Greed," CESifo Working Paper Series 4883, CESifo.
    12. Niko de Silva & Benno Torgler, 2011. "Smoke Signals and Mixed Messages: Medical Marijuana & Drug Policy Signalling Effects," CREMA Working Paper Series 2011-18, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    13. Luc Brès & Sébastien Mena & Marie‐Laure Salles‐Djelic, 2019. "Exploring the formal and informal roles of regulatory intermediaries in transnational multistakeholder regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 127-140, June.
    14. Khandeparkar, Kapil & Motiani, Manoj & Sharma, Amalesh, 2021. "Thank you for not smoking – A multi-method investigation to understand the effect of anti-smoking warnings in television programs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 462-472.
    15. Chin W. Yang & Hui Wen Cheng & Ching Wen Chi & Bwo-Nung Huang, 2016. "A Tax Can Increase Profit of a Monopolist or a Monopoly-like Firm: A Fiction or Distinct Possibility?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 216(1), pages 39-60, March.
    16. Sulki Chung & Jaekyoung Lee & Hae Kook Lee, 2019. "Personal Factors, Internet Characteristics, and Environmental Factors Contributing to Adolescent Internet Addiction: A Public Health Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Timothy Dewhirst & Wonkyong B. Lee & Geoffrey T. Fong & Pamela M. Ling, 2016. "Exporting an Inherently Harmful Product: The Marketing of Virginia Slims Cigarettes in the United States, Japan, and Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 161-181, November.
    18. Naowarut Charoenca & Jeremiah Mock & Nipapun Kungskulniti & Sunida Preechawong & Nicholas Kojetin & Stephen L. Hamann, 2012. "Success Counteracting Tobacco Company Interference in Thailand: An Example of FCTC Implementation for Low- and Middle-income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Phillips, Aryn Z. & Rodriguez, Hector P., 2020. "U.S. county “food swamp” severity and hospitalization rates among adults with diabetes: A nonlinear relationship," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    20. Gary Sacks & Devorah Riesenberg & Melissa Mialon & Sarah Dean & Adrian J Cameron, 2020. "The characteristics and extent of food industry involvement in peer-reviewed research articles from 10 leading nutrition-related journals in 2018," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0087389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.