IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v71y2010i8p1527-1534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The changing role of agriculture in tobacco control policymaking: A South Carolina case study

Author

Listed:
  • Sullivan, Sarah
  • Glantz, Stanton

Abstract

To document the behavior of tobacco manufacturers' agricultural third-party allies in South Carolina from the 1970s through 2009, we analyzed news reports, public documents and internal tobacco industry documents and conducted interviews with knowledgeable individuals. We found that agriculture-based interest groups (the Farm Bureau), elected state agency heads (Commissioners of Agriculture) and tobacco-area legislators acted as an iron triangle containing strong third-party allies of tobacco manufacturers from the 1970s through the 1990s. The Farm Bureau and Commissioners of Agriculture reacted to national-level changes in the tobacco leaf market structure by shifting towards a neutral position on tobacco control, while some tobacco-area legislators remained manufacturer allies (Sullivan, Barnes, & Glantz, 2009). This shift was reinforced by public health outreach and successes, which were in turn facilitated by the lack of opposition from agricultural groups. We conclude that public health advocates in tobacco-growing states should use the pragmatic shift of agricultural groups' position to challenge remaining third-party manufacturer alliances and agriculture-based opposition to tobacco control policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sullivan, Sarah & Glantz, Stanton, 2010. "The changing role of agriculture in tobacco control policymaking: A South Carolina case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1527-1534, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:71:y:2010:i:8:p:1527-1534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(10)00576-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Blake Brown & Randal R. Rucker & Walter N. Thurman, 2007. "The End of the Federal Tobacco Program: Economic Impacts of the Deregulation of U.S. Tobacco Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 635-655.
    2. Mandel, Lev L & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt10r1t4b8, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. repec:cup:jagaec:v:40:y:2008:i:1:p:53-71_22 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jordan, A. Grant, 1981. "Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 95-123, February.
    5. James M Lightwood & Alexis Dinno & Stanton A Glantz, 2008. "Effect of the California Tobacco Control Program on Personal Health Care Expenditures," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Givel, M.S. & Glantz, S.A., 2000. "Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: Policy lessons from Florida," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(5), pages 762-767.
    7. Sullivan BA, Sarah & Barnes, Richard L JD & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2009. "Shifting Attitudes Towards Tobacco Control in Tobacco Country: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in South Carolina," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt278790h5, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    8. Givel, M. & Glantz, S.A., 2004. "The "Global Settlement" with the Tobacco Industry: 6 Years Later," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(2), pages 218-224.
    9. Beach, Robert H. & Jones, Alison Snow & Tooze, Janet A., 2008. "Tobacco Farmer Interest and Success in Income Diversification," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 53-71, April.
    10. Mamudu, Hadii M. & Hammond, Ross & Glantz, Stanton, 2008. "Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1690-1699, December.
    11. Epps-Johnson, BA, Tiana & Barnes, JD, Richard & Glantz, PhD, Stanton, 2009. "The Stars Aligned Over the Cornfields: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in Iowa 1897-2009," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt5dt9w35k, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    12. Ritch, W.A. & Begay, M.E., 2001. "Strange bedfellows: The history of collaboration between the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and the tobacco industry," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(4), pages 598-603.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily Savell & Anna B Gilmore & Gary Fooks, 2014. "How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Flam, Helena, 1990. "Corporate actors: Definition, genesis, and interaction," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Alamar, B C & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Smoke-free ordinances increase restaurant profit and value," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt91w950j4, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2010. "Post-Buyout Structural Change in the Peanut and Tobacco Sectors," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56355, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Mark Thatcher, 1998. "The Development of Policy Network Analyses," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(4), pages 389-416, October.
    6. Rusdi Rusdi & Harianto Harianto & Sri Hartoyo & Tanti Novianti, 2021. "Analysis the Effect of Coconut Production Risk and Price on the Economic Behavior of Coconut Farmers in Seruyan District, Central Borneo Province, Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 64-71.
    7. Grant Jordan, 1990. "Sub-Governments, Policy Communities and Networks," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(3), pages 319-338, July.
    8. Ida Zelenka, 2009. "Tax Policy Impact on Consumption of Tobacco Products in Croatia," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 33(4), pages 479-493.
    9. Owoeye, Olumide Bamidele & Olaniyan, Olanrewaju, 2015. "Economic Cost of Tobacco-Related Diseases in Nigeria: a Study of three Hospitals in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria," MPRA Paper 88054, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    10. Iris Wanzenböck & Joeri H Wesseling & Koen Frenken & Marko P Hekkert & K Matthias Weber, 0. "A framework for mission-oriented innovation policy: Alternative pathways through the problem–solution space," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 474-489.
    11. Adriana Appau & Jeffrey Drope & Firman Witoelar & Jenina Joy Chavez & Raphael Lencucha, 2019. "Why Do Farmers Grow Tobacco? A Qualitative Exploration of Farmers Perspectives in Indonesia and Philippines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Connolly, DMD, MPH, Gregory N & Carpenter, MS, Carrie & Alpert, ScM., BSc, Hillel R. & Skeer, MSW, MPH, Margie & Travers, Mark, 2005. "Evaluation of the Massachusetts Smoke-free Workplace Law," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt1zw4x02j, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    13. Gary J Fooks & Anna B Gilmore, 2013. "Corporate Philanthropy, Political Influence, and Health Policy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, November.
    14. Helen Pushkarskaya & Maria Marshall, 2010. "Family Structure, Policy Shocks, and Family Business Adjustment Choices," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 414-426, December.
    15. Gary Fooks & Anna Gilmore & Jeff Collin & Chris Holden & Kelley Lee, 2013. "The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 283-299, January.
    16. Lightwood, James & Glantz, Stanton, 2011. "Effect of the Arizona tobacco control program on cigarette consumption and healthcare expenditures," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 166-172, January.
    17. Bialous, Stella Aguinaga & Mandel, Lev L. & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2006. "Avoiding “Truth”: Tobacco Industry Promotion of Life Skills Training," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt2cd8t2jd, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    18. James Lightwood & Stanton A Glantz, 2013. "The Effect of the California Tobacco Control Program on Smoking Prevalence, Cigarette Consumption, and Healthcare Costs: 1989–2008," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    19. Andrew Schmitz & Dwayne J. Haynes & Troy G. Schmitz, 2016. "Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 439-454, September.
    20. M. Kerem Coban, 2024. "Rethinking de facto autonomy? A multi‐policy area approach and the regulatory policy process," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(3), pages 508-530, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:71:y:2010:i:8:p:1527-1534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.