IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2007.130740_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research

Author

Listed:
  • Landman, A.
  • Glantz, S.A.

Abstract

The tobacco industry, working through third parties to prevent policy-relevant research that adversely affected it between 1988 and 1998, used coordinated, well-funded strategies in repeated attempts to silence tobacco researcher Stanton A. Glantz. Tactics included advertising, litigation, and attempts to have the US Congress cut off the researcher's National Cancer Institute funding. Efforts like these can influence the policymaking process by silencing opposing voices and discouraging other scientists from doing work that may expose them to tobacco industry attacks. The support of highly credible public health organizations and of researchers' employers is crucial to the continued advancement of public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Landman, A. & Glantz, S.A., 2009. "Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(1), pages 45-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2007.130740_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naowarut Charoenca & Jeremiah Mock & Nipapun Kungskulniti & Sunida Preechawong & Nicholas Kojetin & Stephen L. Hamann, 2012. "Success Counteracting Tobacco Company Interference in Thailand: An Example of FCTC Implementation for Low- and Middle-income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Abigail B. Brown & Jacob Alex Klerman, 2012. "Independent Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(3), pages 186-219, June.
    3. Amira Osman & Sarah D. Kowitt & Paschal Sheeran & Kristen L. Jarman & Leah M. Ranney & Adam O. Goldstein, 2018. "Information to Improve Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA’s) Tobacco Regulatory Role," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Emily Savell & Anna B Gilmore & Gary Fooks, 2014. "How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2007.130740_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.