IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0030238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconsidering Association Testing Methods Using Single-Variant Test Statistics as Alternatives to Pooling Tests for Sequence Data with Rare Variants

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel D Kinnamon
  • Ray E Hershberger
  • Eden R Martin

Abstract

Association tests that pool minor alleles into a measure of burden at a locus have been proposed for case-control studies using sequence data containing rare variants. However, such pooling tests are not robust to the inclusion of neutral and protective variants, which can mask the association signal from risk variants. Early studies proposing pooling tests dismissed methods for locus-wide inference using nonnegative single-variant test statistics based on unrealistic comparisons. However, such methods are robust to the inclusion of neutral and protective variants and therefore may be more useful than previously appreciated. In fact, some recently proposed methods derived within different frameworks are equivalent to performing inference on weighted sums of squared single-variant score statistics. In this study, we compared two existing methods for locus-wide inference using nonnegative single-variant test statistics to two widely cited pooling tests under more realistic conditions. We established analytic results for a simple model with one rare risk and one rare neutral variant, which demonstrated that pooling tests were less powerful than even Bonferroni-corrected single-variant tests in most realistic situations. We also performed simulations using variants with realistic minor allele frequency and linkage disequilibrium spectra, disease models with multiple rare risk variants and extensive neutral variation, and varying rates of missing genotypes. In all scenarios considered, existing methods using nonnegative single-variant test statistics had power comparable to or greater than two widely cited pooling tests. Moreover, in disease models with only rare risk variants, an existing method based on the maximum single-variant Cochran-Armitage trend chi-square statistic in the locus had power comparable to or greater than another existing method closely related to some recently proposed methods. We conclude that efficient locus-wide inference using single-variant test statistics should be reconsidered as a useful framework for devising powerful association tests in sequence data with rare variants.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel D Kinnamon & Ray E Hershberger & Eden R Martin, 2012. "Reconsidering Association Testing Methods Using Single-Variant Test Statistics as Alternatives to Pooling Tests for Sequence Data with Rare Variants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0030238
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0030238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0030238&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0030238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iuliana Ionita-Laza & Joseph D Buxbaum & Nan M Laird & Christoph Lange, 2011. "A New Testing Strategy to Identify Rare Variants with Either Risk or Protective Effect on Disease," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    2. Thomas J Hoffmann & Nicholas J Marini & John S Witte, 2010. "Comprehensive Approach to Analyzing Rare Genetic Variants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Benjamin M Neale & Manuel A Rivas & Benjamin F Voight & David Altshuler & Bernie Devlin & Marju Orho-Melander & Sekar Kathiresan & Shaun M Purcell & Kathryn Roeder & Mark J Daly, 2011. "Testing for an Unusual Distribution of Rare Variants," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinge Jessie Jeng & Zhongyin John Daye & Wenbin Lu & Jung-Ying Tzeng, 2016. "Rare Variants Association Analysis in Large-Scale Sequencing Studies at the Single Locus Level," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Rachel Marceau West & Wenbin Lu & Daniel M Rotroff & Melaine A Kuenemann & Sheng-Mao Chang & Michael C Wu & Michael J Wagner & John B Buse & Alison A Motsinger-Reif & Denis Fourches & Jung-Ying Tzeng, 2019. "Identifying individual risk rare variants using protein structure guided local tests (POINT)," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Nanye Long & Samuel P Dickson & Jessica M Maia & Hee Shin Kim & Qianqian Zhu & Andrew S Allen, 2013. "Leveraging Prior Information to Detect Causal Variants via Multi-Variant Regression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nanye Long & Samuel P Dickson & Jessica M Maia & Hee Shin Kim & Qianqian Zhu & Andrew S Allen, 2013. "Leveraging Prior Information to Detect Causal Variants via Multi-Variant Regression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Chung-Feng Kao & Jia-Rou Liu & Hung Hung & Po-Hsiu Kuo, 2015. "A Robust GWSS Method to Simultaneously Detect Rare and Common Variants for Complex Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Ren-Hua Chung & Wei-Yun Tsai & Eden R Martin, 2014. "Family-Based Association Test Using Both Common and Rare Variants and Accounting for Directions of Effects for Sequencing Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-7, September.
    4. Elodie Persyn & Richard Redon & Lise Bellanger & Christian Dina, 2018. "The impact of a fine-scale population stratification on rare variant association test results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Wenjing Qi & Andrew S Allen & Yi-Ju Li, 2019. "Family-based association tests for rare variants with censored traits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Rajesh Talluri & Sanjay Shete, 2013. "A Linkage Disequilibrium–Based Approach to Selecting Disease-Associated Rare Variants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-6, July.
    7. Zheng Xu & Song Yan & Cong Wu & Qing Duan & Sixia Chen & Yun Li, 2023. "Next-Generation Sequencing Data-Based Association Testing of a Group of Genetic Markers for Complex Responses Using a Generalized Linear Model Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Xinge Jessie Jeng & Zhongyin John Daye & Wenbin Lu & Jung-Ying Tzeng, 2016. "Rare Variants Association Analysis in Large-Scale Sequencing Studies at the Single Locus Level," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Wan-Yu Lin, 2014. "Adaptive Combination of P-Values for Family-Based Association Testing with Sequence Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Gourab De & Wai-Ki Yip & Iuliana Ionita-Laza & Nan Laird, 2013. "Rare Variant Analysis for Family-Based Design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    11. Cameron Palmer & Itsik Pe’er, 2016. "Bias Characterization in Probabilistic Genotype Data and Improved Signal Detection with Multiple Imputation," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Yukinori Okada & Dorothee Diogo & Jeffrey D Greenberg & Faten Mouassess & Walid A L Achkar & Robert S Fulton & Joshua C Denny & Namrata Gupta & Daniel Mirel & Stacy Gabriel & Gang Li & Joel M Kremer &, 2014. "Integration of Sequence Data from a Consanguineous Family with Genetic Data from an Outbred Population Identifies PLB1 as a Candidate Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Gene," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Rachel Marceau West & Wenbin Lu & Daniel M Rotroff & Melaine A Kuenemann & Sheng-Mao Chang & Michael C Wu & Michael J Wagner & John B Buse & Alison A Motsinger-Reif & Denis Fourches & Jung-Ying Tzeng, 2019. "Identifying individual risk rare variants using protein structure guided local tests (POINT)," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Martin Ladouceur & Zari Dastani & Yurii S Aulchenko & Celia M T Greenwood & J Brent Richards, 2012. "The Empirical Power of Rare Variant Association Methods: Results from Sanger Sequencing in 1,998 Individuals," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    15. Boyang Fu & Ali Pazokitoroudi & Mukund Sudarshan & Zhengtong Liu & Lakshminarayanan Subramanian & Sriram Sankararaman, 2023. "Fast kernel-based association testing of non-linear genetic effects for biobank-scale data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Timothy D O’Connor & Adam Kiezun & Michael Bamshad & Stephen S Rich & Joshua D Smith & Emily Turner & NHLBIGO Exome Sequencing Project & ESP Population Genetics, Statistical Analysis Working Group & S, 2013. "Fine-Scale Patterns of Population Stratification Confound Rare Variant Association Tests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    17. Zhenchuan Wang & Qiuying Sha & Shuanglin Zhang, 2016. "Joint Analysis of Multiple Traits Using "Optimal" Maximum Heritability Test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Yi Nengjun & Xu Shizhong & Lou Xiang-Yang & Mallick Himel, 2014. "Multiple comparisons in genetic association studies: a hierarchical modeling approach," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 35-48, February.
    19. Zheng Xu, 2023. "Association Testing of a Group of Genetic Markers Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Data and Continuous Response Using a Linear Model Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, March.
    20. Mischan Vali-Pour & Solip Park & Jose Espinosa-Carrasco & Daniel Ortiz-Martínez & Ben Lehner & Fran Supek, 2022. "The impact of rare germline variants on human somatic mutation processes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0030238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.