IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea K Barreiro
  • Shree Hari Gautam
  • Woodrow L Shew
  • Cheng Ly

Abstract

Determining how synaptic coupling within and between regions is modulated during sensory processing is an important topic in neuroscience. Electrophysiological recordings provide detailed information about neural spiking but have traditionally been confined to a particular region or layer of cortex. Here we develop new theoretical methods to study interactions between and within two brain regions, based on experimental measurements of spiking activity simultaneously recorded from the two regions. By systematically comparing experimentally-obtained spiking statistics to (efficiently computed) model spike rate statistics, we identify regions in model parameter space that are consistent with the experimental data. We apply our new technique to dual micro-electrode array in vivo recordings from two distinct regions: olfactory bulb (OB) and anterior piriform cortex (PC). Our analysis predicts that: i) inhibition within the afferent region (OB) has to be weaker than the inhibition within PC, ii) excitation from PC to OB is generally stronger than excitation from OB to PC, iii) excitation from PC to OB and inhibition within PC have to both be relatively strong compared to presynaptic inputs from OB. These predictions are validated in a spiking neural network model of the OB–PC pathway that satisfies the many constraints from our experimental data. We find when the derived relationships are violated, the spiking statistics no longer satisfy the constraints from the data. In principle this modeling framework can be adapted to other systems and be used to investigate relationships between other neural attributes besides network connection strengths. Thus, this work can serve as a guide to further investigations into the relationships of various neural attributes within and across different regions during sensory processing.Author summary: Sensory processing is known to span multiple regions of the nervous system. However, electrophysiological recordings during sensory processing have traditionally been limited to a single region or brain layer. With recent advances in experimental techniques, recorded spiking activity from multiple regions simultaneously is feasible. However, other important quantities— such as inter-region connection strengths—cannot yet be measured. Here, we develop new theoretical tools to leverage data obtained by recording from two different brain regions simultaneously. We address the following questions: what are the crucial neural network attributes that enable sensory processing across different regions, and how are these attributes related to one another? With a novel theoretical framework to efficiently calculate spiking statistics, we can characterize a high dimensional parameter space that satisfies data constraints. We apply our results to the olfactory system to make specific predictions about effective network connectivity. Our framework relies on incorporating relatively easy-to-measure quantities to predict hard-to-measure interactions across multiple brain regions. Because this work is adaptable to other systems, we anticipate it will be a valuable tool for analysis of other larger scale brain recordings.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005780
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005780
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005780&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shree Hari Gautam & Thanh T Hoang & Kylie McClanahan & Stephen K Grady & Woodrow L Shew, 2015. "Maximizing Sensory Dynamic Range by Tuning the Cortical State to Criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Tom Tetzlaff & Moritz Helias & Gaute T Einevoll & Markus Diesmann, 2012. "Decorrelation of Neural-Network Activity by Inhibitory Feedback," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan & Ferenc Mechler & Keith P. Purpura & Anita M. Schmid & Qin Hu & Jonathan D. Victor, 2010. "Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7306), pages 617-621, July.
    6. Olivier Gschwend & Jonathan Beroud & Alan Carleton, 2012. "Encoding Odorant Identity by Spiking Packets of Rate-Invariant Neurons in Awake Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. James Trousdale & Yu Hu & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić, 2012. "Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Andrea K Barreiro & Cheng Ly, 2017. "When do correlations increase with firing rates in recurrent networks?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Michael A Buice & Carson C Chow, 2013. "Dynamic Finite Size Effects in Spiking Neural Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Volker Pernice & Rava Azeredo da Silveira, 2018. "Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    3. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    4. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Krešimir Josić & Eric Shea-Brown & Michael A Buice, 2017. "Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-47, June.
    5. Moritz Helias & Tom Tetzlaff & Markus Diesmann, 2014. "The Correlation Structure of Local Neuronal Networks Intrinsically Results from Recurrent Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Thomas F Varley & Olaf Sporns & Aina Puce & John Beggs, 2020. "Differential effects of propofol and ketamine on critical brain dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Emiliano Torre & Carlos Canova & Michael Denker & George Gerstein & Moritz Helias & Sonja Grün, 2016. "ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    10. Hideaki Shimazaki & Shun-ichi Amari & Emery N Brown & Sonja Grün, 2012. "State-Space Analysis of Time-Varying Higher-Order Spike Correlation for Multiple Neural Spike Train Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Marc de Kamps & Mikkel Lepperød & Yi Ming Lai, 2019. "Computational geometry for modeling neural populations: From visualization to simulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, March.
    13. Montani, Fernando & Phoka, Elena & Portesi, Mariela & Schultz, Simon R., 2013. "Statistical modelling of higher-order correlations in pools of neural activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(14), pages 3066-3086.
    14. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Vicente Reyes-Puerta & Suam Kim & Jyh-Jang Sun & Barbara Imbrosci & Werner Kilb & Heiko J Luhmann, 2015. "High Stimulus-Related Information in Barrel Cortex Inhibitory Interneurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Urs Köster & Jascha Sohl-Dickstein & Charles M Gray & Bruno A Olshausen, 2014. "Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    17. Bruno Del Papa & Viola Priesemann & Jochen Triesch, 2017. "Criticality meets learning: Criticality signatures in a self-organizing recurrent neural network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Safaeesirat, Amin & Moghimi-Araghi, Saman, 2022. "Critical behavior at the onset of synchronization in a neuronal model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 587(C).
    19. Matthias Schultze-Kraft & Markus Diesmann & Sonja Grün & Moritz Helias, 2013. "Noise Suppression and Surplus Synchrony by Coincidence Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Camille Mazo & Antoine Nissant & Soham Saha & Enzo Peroni & Pierre-Marie Lledo & Gabriel Lepousez, 2022. "Long-range GABAergic projections contribute to cortical feedback control of sensory processing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.