IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0030155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encoding Odorant Identity by Spiking Packets of Rate-Invariant Neurons in Awake Mice

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Gschwend
  • Jonathan Beroud
  • Alan Carleton

Abstract

Background: How do neural networks encode sensory information? Following sensory stimulation, neural coding is commonly assumed to be based on neurons changing their firing rate. In contrast, both theoretical works and experiments in several sensory systems showed that neurons could encode information as coordinated cell assemblies by adjusting their spike timing and without changing their firing rate. Nevertheless, in the olfactory system, there is little experimental evidence supporting such model. Methodology/Principal Findings: To study these issues, we implanted tetrodes in the olfactory bulb of awake mice to record the odorant-evoked activity of mitral/tufted (M/T) cells. We showed that following odorant presentation, most M/T neurons do not significantly change their firing rate over a breathing cycle but rather respond to odorant stimulation by redistributing their firing activity within respiratory cycles. In addition, we showed that sensory information can be encoded by cell assemblies composed of such neurons, thus supporting the idea that coordinated populations of globally rate-invariant neurons could be efficiently used to convey information about the odorant identity. We showed that different coding schemes can convey high amount of odorant information for specific read-out time window. Finally we showed that the optimal readout time window corresponds to the duration of gamma oscillations cycles. Conclusion: We propose that odorant can be encoded by population of cells that exhibit fine temporal tuning of spiking activity while displaying weak or no firing rate change. These cell assemblies may transfer sensory information in spiking packets sequence using the gamma oscillations as a clock. This would allow the system to reach a tradeoff between rapid and accurate odorant discrimination.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Gschwend & Jonathan Beroud & Alan Carleton, 2012. "Encoding Odorant Identity by Spiking Packets of Rate-Invariant Neurons in Awake Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0030155
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0030155
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0030155&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0030155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Stopfer & Gilles Laurent, 1999. "Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6762), pages 664-668, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.
    2. Camille Mazo & Antoine Nissant & Soham Saha & Enzo Peroni & Pierre-Marie Lledo & Gabriel Lepousez, 2022. "Long-range GABAergic projections contribute to cortical feedback control of sensory processing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0030155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.