IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Koch Ocker
  • Krešimir Josić
  • Eric Shea-Brown
  • Michael A Buice

Abstract

Recent experimental advances are producing an avalanche of data on both neural connectivity and neural activity. To take full advantage of these two emerging datasets we need a framework that links them, revealing how collective neural activity arises from the structure of neural connectivity and intrinsic neural dynamics. This problem of structure-driven activity has drawn major interest in computational neuroscience. Existing methods for relating activity and architecture in spiking networks rely on linearizing activity around a central operating point and thus fail to capture the nonlinear responses of individual neurons that are the hallmark of neural information processing. Here, we overcome this limitation and present a new relationship between connectivity and activity in networks of nonlinear spiking neurons by developing a diagrammatic fluctuation expansion based on statistical field theory. We explicitly show how recurrent network structure produces pairwise and higher-order correlated activity, and how nonlinearities impact the networks’ spiking activity. Our findings open new avenues to investigating how single-neuron nonlinearities—including those of different cell types—combine with connectivity to shape population activity and function.Author summary: Neuronal networks, like many biological systems, exhibit variable activity. This activity is shaped by both the underlying biology of the component neurons and the structure of their interactions. How can we combine knowledge of these two things—that is, models of individual neurons and of their interactions—to predict the statistics of single- and multi-neuron activity? Current approaches rely on linearizing neural activity around a stationary state. In the face of neural nonlinearities, however, these linear methods can fail to predict spiking statistics and even fail to correctly predict whether activity is stable or pathological. Here, we show how to calculate any spike train cumulant in a broad class of models, while systematically accounting for nonlinear effects. We then study a fundamental effect of nonlinear input-rate transfer–coupling between different orders of spiking statistic–and how this depends on single-neuron and network properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Koch Ocker & Krešimir Josić & Eric Shea-Brown & Michael A Buice, 2017. "Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-47, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005583
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005583
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005583&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omri Harish & David Hansel, 2015. "Asynchronous Rate Chaos in Spiking Neuronal Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-38, July.
    2. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Yumiko Yoshimura & Jami L. M. Dantzker & Edward M. Callaway, 2005. "Excitatory cortical neurons form fine-scale functional networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7028), pages 868-873, February.
    4. Wei-Chung Allen Lee & Vincent Bonin & Michael Reed & Brett J. Graham & Greg Hood & Katie Glattfelder & R. Clay Reid, 2016. "Anatomy and function of an excitatory network in the visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 532(7599), pages 370-374, April.
    5. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
    6. A. Saichev & D. Sornette, 2011. "Generating functions and stability study of multivariate self-excited epidemic processes," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 83(2), pages 271-282, September.
    7. W. Martin Usrey & John B. Reppas & R. Clay Reid, 1998. "Paired-spike interactions and synaptic efficacy of retinal inputs to the thalamus," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6700), pages 384-387, September.
    8. Ramakrishnan Iyer & Vilas Menon & Michael Buice & Christof Koch & Stefan Mihalas, 2013. "The Influence of Synaptic Weight Distribution on Neuronal Population Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    10. Markus Diesmann & Marc-Oliver Gewaltig & Ad Aertsen, 1999. "Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 529-533, December.
    11. James Trousdale & Yu Hu & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić, 2012. "Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Jaime de la Rocha & Brent Doiron & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić & Alex Reyes, 2007. "Correlation between neural spike trains increases with firing rate," Nature, Nature, vol. 448(7155), pages 802-806, August.
    13. Lee Cossell & Maria Florencia Iacaruso & Dylan R. Muir & Rachael Houlton & Elie N. Sader & Ho Ko & Sonja B. Hofer & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2015. "Functional organization of excitatory synaptic strength in primary visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7539), pages 399-403, February.
    14. Editors The, 2007. "From the Editors," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Recanatesi & Gabriel Koch Ocker & Michael A Buice & Eric Shea-Brown, 2019. "Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: Global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Privault, Nicolas, 2021. "Recursive computation of the Hawkes cumulants," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Recanatesi & Gabriel Koch Ocker & Michael A Buice & Eric Shea-Brown, 2019. "Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: Global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    3. Tom Tetzlaff & Moritz Helias & Gaute T Einevoll & Markus Diesmann, 2012. "Decorrelation of Neural-Network Activity by Inhibitory Feedback," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Moritz Helias & Tom Tetzlaff & Markus Diesmann, 2014. "The Correlation Structure of Local Neuronal Networks Intrinsically Results from Recurrent Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Yoav Printz & Pritish Patil & Mathias Mahn & Asaf Benjamin & Anna Litvin & Rivka Levy & Max Bringmann & Ofer Yizhar, 2023. "Determinants of functional synaptic connectivity among amygdala-projecting prefrontal cortical neurons in male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Volker Pernice & Rava Azeredo da Silveira, 2018. "Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Andrea K Barreiro & Cheng Ly, 2017. "When do correlations increase with firing rates in recurrent networks?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Bettina Voelcker & Ravi Pancholi & Simon Peron, 2022. "Transformation of primary sensory cortical representations from layer 4 to layer 2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Richard Naud & Wulfram Gerstner, 2012. "Coding and Decoding with Adapting Neurons: A Population Approach to the Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Emiliano Torre & Carlos Canova & Michael Denker & George Gerstein & Moritz Helias & Sonja Grün, 2016. "ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    13. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    14. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    15. Jérémie Sibille & Carolin Gehr & Jonathan I. Benichov & Hymavathy Balasubramanian & Kai Lun Teh & Tatiana Lupashina & Daniela Vallentin & Jens Kremkow, 2022. "High-density electrode recordings reveal strong and specific connections between retinal ganglion cells and midbrain neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. James Trousdale & Yu Hu & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić, 2012. "Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Zhou, Xinjia & Zhang, Yan & Gu, Tianyi & Zheng, Muhua & Xu, Kesheng, 2024. "Mixed synaptic modulation and inhibitory plasticity perform complementary roles in metastable transitions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 635(C).
    18. Bartul Mimica & Tuçe Tombaz & Claudia Battistin & Jingyi Guo Fuglstad & Benjamin A. Dunn & Jonathan R. Whitlock, 2023. "Behavioral decomposition reveals rich encoding structure employed across neocortex in rats," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Hang Zhou & Guo-Qiang Bi & Guosong Liu, 2024. "Intracellular magnesium optimizes transmission efficiency and plasticity of hippocampal synapses by reconfiguring their connectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.