IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome

Author

Listed:
  • Matthieu Gilson
  • Ruben Moreno-Bote
  • Adrián Ponce-Alvarez
  • Petra Ritter
  • Gustavo Deco

Abstract

The brain exhibits complex spatio-temporal patterns of activity. This phenomenon is governed by an interplay between the internal neural dynamics of cortical areas and their connectivity. Uncovering this complex relationship has raised much interest, both for theory and the interpretation of experimental data (e.g., fMRI recordings) using dynamical models. Here we focus on the so-called inverse problem: the inference of network parameters in a cortical model to reproduce empirically observed activity. Although it has received a lot of interest, recovering directed connectivity for large networks has been rather unsuccessful so far. The present study specifically addresses this point for a noise-diffusion network model. We develop a Lyapunov optimization that iteratively tunes the network connectivity in order to reproduce second-order moments of the node activity, or functional connectivity. We show theoretically and numerically that the use of covariances with both zero and non-zero time shifts is the key to infer directed connectivity. The first main theoretical finding is that an accurate estimation of the underlying network connectivity requires that the time shift for covariances is matched with the time constant of the dynamical system. In addition to the network connectivity, we also adjust the intrinsic noise received by each network node. The framework is applied to experimental fMRI data recorded for subjects at rest. Diffusion-weighted MRI data provide an estimate of anatomical connections, which is incorporated to constrain the cortical model. The empirical covariance structure is reproduced faithfully, especially its temporal component (i.e., time-shifted covariances) in addition to the spatial component that is usually the focus of studies. We find that the cortical interactions, referred to as effective connectivity, in the tuned model are not reciprocal. In particular, hubs are either receptors or feeders: they do not exhibit both strong incoming and outgoing connections. Our results sets a quantitative ground to explore the propagation of activity in the cortex.Author Summary: The study of interactions between different cortical regions at rest or during a task has considerably developed in the past decades thanks to progress in non-invasive imaging techniques, such as fMRI, EEG and MEG. These techniques have revealed that distant cortical areas exhibit specific correlated activity during the resting state, also called functional connectivity (FC). Moreover, recent studies have highlighted the possible role of white-matter projections between cortical regions in shaping these activity patterns. This structural connectivity (SC) can be estimated using MRI, which measures the probability for two areas to be connected via the density of neural fibers. However, this does not provide the strengths of dynamical interactions. Many methods have thus been developed to estimate the connectivity between neural populations in the cortex that is hypothesized to shape FC. The strengths of these dynamical interactions are called effective connectivity (EC). We use a cortical model that combines information from Diffusion-weighted MRI (dwMRI) and fMRI in order to estimate EC. We demonstrate theoretically that directed C can be inferred using time-shifted covariances. The key point of our method is the use of temporal information from FC at the scale of the whole network. Applying our model on experimental fMRI data at rest, we estimate the asymmetry of intracortical connectivity. Obtaining an accurate EC estimate is essential to analyze its graph properties, such as hubs. In particular, directed connectivity links to the asymmetry between input and output EC strengths of each node, which characterizes feeder and receiver hubs in the cortical network.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthieu Gilson & Ruben Moreno-Bote & Adrián Ponce-Alvarez & Petra Ritter & Gustavo Deco, 2016. "Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004762
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004762
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004762&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Trousdale & Yu Hu & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić, 2012. "Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Sanggyun Kim & David Putrino & Soumya Ghosh & Emery N Brown, 2011. "A Granger Causality Measure for Point Process Models of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthieu Gilson & David Dahmen & Rubén Moreno-Bote & Andrea Insabato & Moritz Helias, 2020. "The covariance perceptron: A new paradigm for classification and processing of time series in recurrent neuronal networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, October.
    2. Tam, H.C. & Ching, Emily S.C. & Lai, Pik-Yin, 2018. "Reconstructing networks from dynamics with correlated noise," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 106-122.
    3. Gustavo Deco & Diego Vidaurre & Morten L. Kringelbach, 2021. "Revisiting the global workspace orchestrating the hierarchical organization of the human brain," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 497-511, April.
    4. Jonathan Schiefer & Alexander Niederbühl & Volker Pernice & Carolin Lennartz & Jürgen Hennig & Pierre LeVan & Stefan Rotter, 2018. "From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Hideaki Shimazaki & Shun-ichi Amari & Emery N Brown & Sonja Grün, 2012. "State-Space Analysis of Time-Varying Higher-Order Spike Correlation for Multiple Neural Spike Train Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    4. Kris V Parag & Glenn Vinnicombe, 2017. "Point process analysis of noise in early invertebrate vision," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    6. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Krešimir Josić & Eric Shea-Brown & Michael A Buice, 2017. "Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-47, June.
    7. Etesami, Jalal & Habibnia, Ali & Kiyavash, Negar, 2017. "Econometric modeling of systemic risk: going beyond pairwise comparison and allowing for nonlinearity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70769, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Tom Tetzlaff & Moritz Helias & Gaute T Einevoll & Markus Diesmann, 2012. "Decorrelation of Neural-Network Activity by Inhibitory Feedback," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Moritz Helias & Tom Tetzlaff & Markus Diesmann, 2014. "The Correlation Structure of Local Neuronal Networks Intrinsically Results from Recurrent Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Antonino Casile & Rose T Faghih & Emery N Brown, 2021. "Robust point-process Granger causality analysis in presence of exogenous temporal modulations and trial-by-trial variability in spike trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Qin, Qing & Deng, Yun & Wang, Jiang & Liu, Jing & Cao, Yibin, 2017. "Synchrony dynamics underlying effective connectivity reconstruction of neuronal circuits," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 674-687.
    12. Stefano Recanatesi & Gabriel Koch Ocker & Michael A Buice & Eric Shea-Brown, 2019. "Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: Global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, July.
    13. Volker Pernice & Rava Azeredo da Silveira, 2018. "Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Andrea K Barreiro & Cheng Ly, 2017. "When do correlations increase with firing rates in recurrent networks?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, April.
    15. Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.
    16. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.