IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy Models of Neural Population Codes

Author

Listed:
  • Einat Granot-Atedgi
  • Gašper Tkačik
  • Ronen Segev
  • Elad Schneidman

Abstract

Neural populations encode information about their stimulus in a collective fashion, by joint activity patterns of spiking and silence. A full account of this mapping from stimulus to neural activity is given by the conditional probability distribution over neural codewords given the sensory input. For large populations, direct sampling of these distributions is impossible, and so we must rely on constructing appropriate models. We show here that in a population of 100 retinal ganglion cells in the salamander retina responding to temporal white-noise stimuli, dependencies between cells play an important encoding role. We introduce the stimulus-dependent maximum entropy (SDME) model—a minimal extension of the canonical linear-nonlinear model of a single neuron, to a pairwise-coupled neural population. We find that the SDME model gives a more accurate account of single cell responses and in particular significantly outperforms uncoupled models in reproducing the distributions of population codewords emitted in response to a stimulus. We show how the SDME model, in conjunction with static maximum entropy models of population vocabulary, can be used to estimate information-theoretic quantities like average surprise and information transmission in a neural population. Author Summary: In the sensory periphery, stimuli are represented by patterns of spikes and silences across a population of sensory neurons. Because the neurons form an interconnected network, the code cannot be understood by looking at single cells alone. Recent recordings in the retina have enabled us to study populations of a hundred or more neurons that carry the visual information into the brain, and thus build probabilistic models of the neural code. Here we present a minimal (maximum entropy) yet powerful extension of well-known linear/nonlinear models for independent neurons, to an interacting population. This model reproduces the behavior of single cells as well as the structure of correlations in neural spiking. Our model predicts much better the complete set of patterns of spiking and silence across a population of cells, allowing us to explore the properties of the stimulus-response mapping, and estimate the information transmission, in bits per second, that the population carries about the stimulus. Our results show that to understand the code, we need to shift our focus from reproducing single-cell properties (such as firing rates) towards understanding the total “vocabulary” of patterns emitted by the population, and that network correlations play a central role in shaping the code of large neural populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Einat Granot-Atedgi & Gašper Tkačik & Ronen Segev & Elad Schneidman, 2013. "Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy Models of Neural Population Codes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002922
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002922&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Nirenberg & S. M. Carcieri & A. L. Jacobs & P. E. Latham, 2001. "Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6838), pages 698-701, June.
    2. Kenneth D. Harris & Jozsef Csicsvari & Hajime Hirase & George Dragoi & György Buzsáki, 2003. "Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6948), pages 552-556, July.
    3. Elad Schneidman & Michael J. Berry & Ronen Segev & William Bialek, 2006. "Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 1007-1012, April.
    4. Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan & Ferenc Mechler & Keith P. Purpura & Anita M. Schmid & Qin Hu & Jonathan D. Victor, 2010. "Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7306), pages 617-621, July.
    5. Mark Stopfer & Seetha Bhagavan & Brian H. Smith & Gilles Laurent, 1997. "Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6655), pages 70-74, November.
    6. Yasser Roudi & Sheila Nirenberg & Peter E Latham, 2009. "Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alok Maity & Roy Wollman, 2020. "Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Urs Köster & Jascha Sohl-Dickstein & Charles M Gray & Bruno A Olshausen, 2014. "Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Gašper Tkačik & Olivier Marre & Dario Amodei & Elad Schneidman & William Bialek & Michael J Berry II, 2014. "Searching for Collective Behavior in a Large Network of Sensory Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Porta Mana, PierGianLuca & Rostami, Vahid & Torre, Emiliano & Roudi, Yasser, 2018. "Maximum-entropy and representative samples of neuronal activity: a dilemma," OSF Preprints uz29n, Center for Open Science.
    5. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Wouter Boomsma & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2014. "Combining Experiments and Simulations Using the Maximum Entropy Principle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.
    7. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montangie, Lisandro & Montani, Fernando, 2015. "Quantifying higher-order correlations in a neuronal pool," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 388-400.
    2. Hideaki Shimazaki & Shun-ichi Amari & Emery N Brown & Sonja Grün, 2012. "State-Space Analysis of Time-Varying Higher-Order Spike Correlation for Multiple Neural Spike Train Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Montani, Fernando & Phoka, Elena & Portesi, Mariela & Schultz, Simon R., 2013. "Statistical modelling of higher-order correlations in pools of neural activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(14), pages 3066-3086.
    4. Seif Eldawlatly & Karim G Oweiss, 2011. "Millisecond-Timescale Local Network Coding in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Cofré, Rodrigo & Cessac, Bruno, 2013. "Dynamics and spike trains statistics in conductance-based integrate-and-fire neural networks with chemical and electric synapses," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 13-31.
    6. Arno Onken & Valentin Dragoi & Klaus Obermayer, 2012. "A Maximum Entropy Test for Evaluating Higher-Order Correlations in Spike Counts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Yasser Roudi & Sheila Nirenberg & Peter E Latham, 2009. "Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Urs Köster & Jascha Sohl-Dickstein & Charles M Gray & Bruno A Olshausen, 2014. "Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Porta Mana, PierGianLuca & Rostami, Vahid & Torre, Emiliano & Roudi, Yasser, 2018. "Maximum-entropy and representative samples of neuronal activity: a dilemma," OSF Preprints uz29n, Center for Open Science.
    12. Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Christopher C Lapish & Jeremy K Seamans & Daniel Durstewitz, 2011. "Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Guillaume Viejo & Thomas Cortier & Adrien Peyrache, 2018. "Brain-state invariant thalamo-cortical coordination revealed by non-linear encoders," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Montangie, Lisandro & Montani, Fernando, 2017. "Higher-order correlations in common input shapes the output spiking activity of a neural population," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 845-861.
    16. Benjamin Dunn & Maria Mørreaunet & Yasser Roudi, 2015. "Correlations and Functional Connections in a Population of Grid Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Xi, Ning & Muneepeerakul, Rachata & Azaele, Sandro & Wang, Yougui, 2014. "Maximum entropy model for business cycle synchronization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 189-194.
    18. Gašper Tkačik & Olivier Marre & Dario Amodei & Elad Schneidman & William Bialek & Michael J Berry II, 2014. "Searching for Collective Behavior in a Large Network of Sensory Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Shohei Hidaka & Masafumi Oizumi, 2018. "Fast and exact search for the partition with minimal information loss," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.