IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational geometry for modeling neural populations: From visualization to simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Marc de Kamps
  • Mikkel Lepperød
  • Yi Ming Lai

Abstract

The importance of a mesoscopic description level of the brain has now been well established. Rate based models are widely used, but have limitations. Recently, several extremely efficient population-level methods have been proposed that go beyond the characterization of a population in terms of a single variable. Here, we present a method for simulating neural populations based on two dimensional (2D) point spiking neuron models that defines the state of the population in terms of a density function over the neural state space. Our method differs in that we do not make the diffusion approximation, nor do we reduce the state space to a single dimension (1D). We do not hard code the neural model, but read in a grid describing its state space in the relevant simulation region. Novel models can be studied without even recompiling the code. The method is highly modular: variations of the deterministic neural dynamics and the stochastic process can be investigated independently. Currently, there is a trend to reduce complex high dimensional neuron models to 2D ones as they offer a rich dynamical repertoire that is not available in 1D, such as limit cycles. We will demonstrate that our method is ideally suited to investigate noise in such systems, replicating results obtained in the diffusion limit and generalizing them to a regime of large jumps. The joint probability density function is much more informative than 1D marginals, and we will argue that the study of 2D systems subject to noise is important complementary to 1D systems.Author summary: A group of slow, noisy and unreliable cells collectively implement our mental faculties, and how they do this is still one of the big scientific questions of our time. Mechanistic explanations of our cognitive skills, be it locomotion, object handling, language comprehension or thinking in general—whatever that may be—is still far off. A few years ago the following question was posed: Imagine that aliens would provide us with a brain-sized clump of matter, with complete freedom to sculpt realistic neuronal networks with arbitrary precision. Would we be able to build a brain? The answer appears to be no, because this technology is actually materializing, not in the form of an alien kick-start, but through steady progress in computing power, simulation methods and the emergence of databases on connectivity, neural cell types, complete with gene expression, etc. A number of groups have created brain-scale simulations, others like the Blue Brain project may not have simulated a full brain, but they included almost every single detail known about the neurons they modelled. And yet, we do not know how we reach for a glass of milk.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc de Kamps & Mikkel Lepperød & Yi Ming Lai, 2019. "Computational geometry for modeling neural populations: From visualization to simulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006729
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006729
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006729&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Cain & Ramakrishnan Iyer & Christof Koch & Stefan Mihalas, 2016. "The Computational Properties of a Simplified Cortical Column Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ramakrishnan Iyer & Vilas Menon & Michael Buice & Christof Koch & Stefan Mihalas, 2013. "The Influence of Synaptic Weight Distribution on Neuronal Population Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Moritz Augustin & Josef Ladenbauer & Fabian Baumann & Klaus Obermayer, 2017. "Low-dimensional spike rate models derived from networks of adaptive integrate-and-fire neurons: Comparison and implementation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-46, June.
    4. Michael A Buice & Carson C Chow, 2013. "Dynamic Finite Size Effects in Spiking Neural Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmutz, Valentin, 2022. "Mean-field limit of age and leaky memory dependent Hawkes processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 39-59.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Krešimir Josić & Eric Shea-Brown & Michael A Buice, 2017. "Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-47, June.
    2. Nicholas Cain & Ramakrishnan Iyer & Christof Koch & Stefan Mihalas, 2016. "The Computational Properties of a Simplified Cortical Column Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.