IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cellular Adaptation Facilitates Sparse and Reliable Coding in Sensory Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Farzad Farkhooi
  • Anja Froese
  • Eilif Muller
  • Randolf Menzel
  • Martin P Nawrot

Abstract

Most neurons in peripheral sensory pathways initially respond vigorously when a preferred stimulus is presented, but adapt as stimulation continues. It is unclear how this phenomenon affects stimulus coding in the later stages of sensory processing. Here, we show that a temporally sparse and reliable stimulus representation develops naturally in sequential stages of a sensory network with adapting neurons. As a modeling framework we employ a mean-field approach together with an adaptive population density treatment, accompanied by numerical simulations of spiking neural networks. We find that cellular adaptation plays a critical role in the dynamic reduction of the trial-by-trial variability of cortical spike responses by transiently suppressing self-generated fast fluctuations in the cortical balanced network. This provides an explanation for a widespread cortical phenomenon by a simple mechanism. We further show that in the insect olfactory system cellular adaptation is sufficient to explain the emergence of the temporally sparse and reliable stimulus representation in the mushroom body. Our results reveal a generic, biophysically plausible mechanism that can explain the emergence of a temporally sparse and reliable stimulus representation within a sequential processing architecture.Author Summary: Many lines of evidence suggest that few spikes carry the relevant stimulus information at later stages of sensory processing. Yet mechanisms for the emergence of a robust and temporally sparse sensory representation remain elusive. Here, we introduce an idea in which a temporal sparse and reliable stimulus representation develops naturally in spiking networks. It combines principles of signal propagation with the commonly observed mechanism of neuronal firing rate adaptation. Using a stringent numerical and mathematical approach, we show how a dense rate code at the periphery translates into a temporal sparse representation in the cortical network. At the same time, it dynamically suppresses trial-by-trial variability, matching experimental observations in sensory cortices. Computational modelling of the insects olfactory pathway suggests that the same principle underlies the prominent example of temporal sparse coding in the mushroom body. Our results reveal a computational principle that relates neuronal firing rate adaptation to temporal sparse coding and variability suppression in nervous systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzad Farkhooi & Anja Froese & Eilif Muller & Randolf Menzel & Martin P Nawrot, 2013. "Cellular Adaptation Facilitates Sparse and Reliable Coding in Sensory Pathways," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003251
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003251&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael London & Arnd Roth & Lisa Beeren & Michael Häusser & Peter E. Latham, 2010. "Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7302), pages 123-127, July.
    2. Sophie J. C. Caron & Vanessa Ruta & L. F. Abbott & Richard Axel, 2013. "Random convergence of olfactory inputs in the Drosophila mushroom body," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7447), pages 113-117, May.
    3. Adrienne L. Fairhall & Geoffrey D. Lewen & William Bialek & Robert R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, 2001. "Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6849), pages 787-792, August.
    4. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Richard Naud & Wulfram Gerstner, 2012. "Coding and Decoding with Adapting Neurons: A Population Approach to the Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Gustavo Deco & Etienne Hugues, 2012. "Neural Network Mechanisms Underlying Stimulus Driven Variability Reduction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corentin Massot & Adam D Schneider & Maurice J Chacron & Kathleen E Cullen, 2012. "The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Oren Amsalem & Hidehiko Inagaki & Jianing Yu & Karel Svoboda & Ran Darshan, 2024. "Sub-threshold neuronal activity and the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Jonathan Rubin & Nachum Ulanovsky & Israel Nelken & Naftali Tishby, 2016. "The Representation of Prediction Error in Auditory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Ishani Ganguly & Emily L. Heckman & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & E. Josephine Clowney & Rudy Behnia, 2024. "Diversity of visual inputs to Kenyon cells of the Drosophila mushroom body," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Noga Mosheiff & Haggai Agmon & Avraham Moriel & Yoram Burak, 2017. "An efficient coding theory for a dynamic trajectory predicts non-uniform allocation of entorhinal grid cells to modules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Omri Harish & David Hansel, 2015. "Asynchronous Rate Chaos in Spiking Neuronal Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-38, July.
    7. Kaitlyn Elizabeth Ellis & Sven Bervoets & Hayley Smihula & Ishani Ganguly & Eva Vigato & Thomas O. Auer & Richard Benton & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Sophie Jeanne Cécile Caron, 2024. "Evolution of connectivity architecture in the Drosophila mushroom body," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Christian Meisel & Andreas Klaus & Christian Kuehn & Dietmar Plenz, 2015. "Critical Slowing Down Governs the Transition to Neuron Spiking," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Michael A Carlin & Mounya Elhilali, 2013. "Sustained Firing of Model Central Auditory Neurons Yields a Discriminative Spectro-temporal Representation for Natural Sounds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Richard Naud & Wulfram Gerstner, 2012. "Coding and Decoding with Adapting Neurons: A Population Approach to the Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Ravi Pancholi & Lauren Ryan & Simon Peron, 2023. "Learning in a sensory cortical microstimulation task is associated with elevated representational stability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Emiliano Torre & Carlos Canova & Michael Denker & George Gerstein & Moritz Helias & Sonja Grün, 2016. "ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    13. Hagai Lalazar & L F Abbott & Eilon Vaadia, 2016. "Tuning Curves for Arm Posture Control in Motor Cortex Are Consistent with Random Connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Michael N Economo & John A White, 2012. "Membrane Properties and the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition Control Gamma-Frequency Oscillations Arising from Feedback Inhibition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Braden A W Brinkman & Alison I Weber & Fred Rieke & Eric Shea-Brown, 2016. "How Do Efficient Coding Strategies Depend on Origins of Noise in Neural Circuits?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-34, October.
    17. Martinez-Saito, Mario, 2022. "Discrete scaling and criticality in a chain of adaptive excitable integrators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Mathieu N Galtier & Jonathan Touboul, 2013. "Macroscopic Equations Governing Noisy Spiking Neuronal Populations with Linear Synapses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, November.
    19. François O David & Etienne Hugues & Tristan Cenier & Nicolas Fourcaud-Trocmé & Nathalie Buonviso, 2009. "Specific Entrainment of Mitral Cells during Gamma Oscillation in the Rat Olfactory Bulb," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-19, October.
    20. J. Gerard Wolff, 2019. "Information Compression as a Unifying Principle in Human Learning, Perception, and Cognition," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-38, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.