IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01989-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of technical and quality assessment considerations of audio-visual and web-conferencing focus groups in qualitative health research

Author

Listed:
  • Hiba Bawadi

    (College of Health Sciences Vice President for Medical and Health Sciences Office Qatar University)

  • Sara Elshami

    (College of Pharmacy Qatar University)

  • Ahmed Awaisu

    (College of Pharmacy Qatar University)

  • Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi

    (Public Health QU-Health, College of Health Sciences Qatar University)

  • Shuja Ashfaq

    (Network and Telecommunications Qatar University)

  • Banan Mukhalalati

    (Clinical Pharmacy and Practice QU-Health, College of Pharmacy Qatar University)

Abstract

The transition from the conventional approach to an online setting in conducting focus groups (FGs) for qualitative research is an increasingly adopted approach in health-related research. The purpose of this narrative review aims to provide an overview of the quality of FGs in health-related research that are conducted using various audio–visual (AV)-enabled and web-conferencing approaches. Online databases searched were Medline/PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Four key concepts (qualitative health-related research, online platforms, platform analysis, and quality measures) were used. A consensus group method, and a review of user guides of three of the currently used online platforms (i.e., “WebEx”, “Zoom”, and “Microsoft Teams”) were employed to develop a set of specific core quality criteria for appraising online qualitative research studies. While various synchronous and asynchronous online FG approaches were utilized in health-related research, audio–visual (AV)-enabled, and web-conferencing approaches were comparable to conventional FGs. These platforms are associated with several advantages, such as spontaneity in responses through real-time interactions among researchers and participants. The developed quality assessment tool for online FGs included criteria such as maintaining the privacy of participants and confidentiality of data collected, appraising the potential selection bias due to technological and logistical requirements, and ensuring the presence of features for recording video and audio within the software. The validated quality criteria that are used to evaluate face-to-face qualitative studies can be applicable in online contexts. However, additional criteria targeting the new features of the online platforms should be considered as well. This review helps health-related researchers and research academic institutions to select the online platform that best addresses their research and institutional needs while maintaining good quality, time-efficient, and cost-effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiba Bawadi & Sara Elshami & Ahmed Awaisu & Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi & Shuja Ashfaq & Banan Mukhalalati, 2023. "A review of technical and quality assessment considerations of audio-visual and web-conferencing focus groups in qualitative health research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01989-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01989-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01989-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01989-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santiago-Delefosse, M. & Gavin, A. & Bruchez, C. & Roux, P. & Stephen, S.L., 2016. "Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 142-151.
    2. Ivana Acocella, 2012. "The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1125-1136, June.
    3. Stacy M. Carter & Patti Shih & Jane Williams & Chris Degeling & Julie Mooney-Somers, 2021. "Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(6), pages 711-718, November.
    4. Whitehead, Lisa Claire, 2007. "Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: An integrated review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 782-791, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narciso, Isabel & Relvas, Ana Paula & Ferreira, Luana Cunha & Vieira-Santos, Salomé & Fernandes, Mariana & de Santa-Bárbara, Sílvia & Machado, Inês, 2018. "Mapping the “good mother” – Meanings and experiences in economically and socially disadvantaged contexts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 418-427.
    2. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Samba Dialimpa Badji & Kristin Skare Orgeret & Bruce Mutsvairo, 2024. "An Exploratory Study of Fact-Checking Practices in Conflict and Authoritarian Contexts," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    4. Silvia Cataldi, 2018. "A proposal for the analysis of the relational dimension in the interview techniques: a pilot study on in-depth interviews and focus groups," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 295-312, January.
    5. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Price promises, trust deficits and energy justice: Public perceptions of hydrogen homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Rolandas Drejeris & Astrida Miceikiene & Jurgita Baranauskiene, 2021. "A New Approach to Entrepreneurship Measurement of Agricultural Business Entities: A Case of Lithuania," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    7. Husbands, Samantha & Mitchell, Paul Mark & Kinghorn, Philip & Byford, Sarah & Bailey, Cara & Anand, Paul & Peters, Tim J. & Floredin, Isabella & Coast, Joanna, 2024. "Is well-becoming important for children and young people? Evidence from in-depth interviews with children and young people and their parents," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122060, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria & Beltran Villarreal-Rao & Matilde Luna & Wendoline Rojas-Mendoza & Christoper A. Alarcon-Ruiz & David Villarreal-Zegarra & Ana L. Vilela-Estrada & Samantha Ramírez, 2022. "Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes in Hospital Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Prabath Chaminda Abeysiriwardana & Udith K. Jayasinghe-Mudalige & Saluka R. Kodituwakku, 2023. "Qualitative Inquiries by Transitioning to ‘Digital Methods’: A Case Study on Leaders’ Perspectives of Agriculture Research Management by Key Performance Indicators," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 22(2), pages 178-192, December.
    10. Andrea Bever & Jackie Manthorne & Tissa Rahim & Layla Moumin & Shelagh M. Szabo, 2022. "The Importance of Disease-Free Survival as a Clinical Trial Endpoint: A Qualitative Study Among Canadian Survivors of Lung Cancer," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 15(3), pages 307-316, May.
    11. Eftychia Kessopoulou & Katerina Gotzamani & Styliani Xanthopoulou & George Tsiotras, 2023. "Conceptualizing and Validating a Model for Benchlearning Capability: Results from the Greek Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Tiberiu Foris & Alina Simona Tecău & Camelia-Cristina Dragomir & Diana Foris, 2022. "The Start-Up Manager in Times of Crisis: Challenges and Solutions for Increasing the Resilience of Companies and Sustainable Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Sara Chinnasamy* & Norminaliza Mohamed Azmi, 2018. "Malaysian 14th General Election: Young Voters & Rising Political Participation," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 125-138:4.
    14. Claudia Speidel, 2024. "The impact of cultural settings on sustainability narratives: an explorative study with the Indian diaspora," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Consuelo Cruz-Riveros & Alfonso Urzúa & Gustavo Macaya-Aguirre & Báltica Cabieses, 2022. "How Do Health Teams Perceive International Migrant Users of Primary Care?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Tiina Kymäläinen & Anu Seisto & Roosa Malila, 2021. "Generation Z Food Waste, Diet and Consumption Habits: A Finnish Social Design Study with Future Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Sayeda Sabrina Ali & Md. Raju Ahmad & Jalal Uddin Mohammad Shoaib & Mohammad Aliuzzaman Sheik & Mohammad Imam Hoshain & Rebecca L. Hall & Katrina A. Macintosh & Paul N. Williams, 2021. "Pandemic or Environmental Socio-Economic Stressors Which Have Greater Impact on Food Security in the Barishal Division of Bangladesh: Initial Perspectives from Agricultural Officers and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Shrivastava, Ritu & Sharma, Lochan & Jolly, Mehak & Ahuja, Romi & Sharma, Radhika & Naslund, John A. & Agrawal, Jyotsna & Shidhaye, Rahul & Mehrotra, Seema & Hollon, Steve D. & Patel, Vikram & Tugnawa, 2023. "“We are everyone's ASHAs but who's there for us?” a qualitative exploration of perceptions of work stress and coping among rural frontline workers in Madhya Pradesh, India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    19. Moawiah Khatatbeh & Fadwa Alhalaiqa & Aws Khasawneh & Ala’a B. Al-Tammemi & Haitham Khatatbeh & Sameera Alhassoun & Omar Al Omari, 2021. "The Experiences of Nurses and Physicians Caring for COVID-19 Patients: Findings from an Exploratory Phenomenological Study in a High Case-Load Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Chinaza Uleanya & Ke Yu, 2023. "Data Collection in Times of Pandemic: A Self-Study and Revisit of Research Practices During a Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01989-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.