IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p125-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Malaysian 14th General Election: Young Voters & Rising Political Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Chinnasamy*

    (The University Technology Mara (UiTM))

  • Norminaliza Mohamed Azmi

    (The University Technology Mara (UiTM))

Abstract

The 14th General Election (GE14) was the most exciting general election ever had by Malaysian’s ever since its independence in 1957. The high participation of young voters or better known as the ‘Kingmaker’ which made up 41% of the total voters was the main reason for the topple of Barisan Nasional (BN) government that have administrated the nation for the last 60 years. Given the influence of awareness towards electoral issues and the political knowledge, this paper aims to understand the young voters’ participation during election. Guided by Michael Foucault ‘Theory of Power’, this paper examines how voters rely on technology to educate themselves on the election issues that become a concern for them before exercising their power by determining and selecting their preferred government. The findings of the data were collected through focus group discussions, involving twelve (12) participants which consist of Malay, Chinese and Indian voters, aged between 21-39 years old. From the findings, issues relating to 1 Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), Goods and Service Tax (GST), high cost of living, and PTPTN have grabbed their attention. Their concern towards these issues were caused by the economy impact that it has on their daily lives. Influenced by their heavy reliance on social media as a source of information which was easily accessible through smart phones further motivates them to cast their votes despite of their depth of knowledge on electoral processes. Nevertheless, both Government and the Election Commission have a vital role to play in drawing young voters’ attention whilst engaging and educating them for the next General Election.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Chinnasamy* & Norminaliza Mohamed Azmi, 2018. "Malaysian 14th General Election: Young Voters & Rising Political Participation," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 125-138:4.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:125-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi4.17.125.138.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/4/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentino Larcinese, 2007. "Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 387-411, June.
    2. Ivana Acocella, 2012. "The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1125-1136, June.
    3. Jennifer Jerit & Jason Barabas & Toby Bolsen, 2006. "Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 266-282, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Gavazza & Mattia Nardotto & Tommaso Valletti, 2019. "Internet and Politics: Evidence from U.K. Local Elections and Local Government Policies," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(5), pages 2092-2135.
    2. James Tilley & Christopher Wlezien, 2008. "Does Political Information Matter? An Experimental Test Relating to Party Positions on Europe," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 192-214, March.
    3. Jo Thori Lind & Dominic Rohner, 2017. "Knowledge is Power: A Theory of Information, Income and Welfare Spending," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(336), pages 611-646, October.
    4. Raphael Bruce & Rudi Rocha, 2014. "The Reaction of Elites in a Democratization Process: Evidence from Brazil," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2014_09, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    5. Consuelo Cruz-Riveros & Alfonso Urzúa & Gustavo Macaya-Aguirre & Báltica Cabieses, 2022. "How Do Health Teams Perceive International Migrant Users of Primary Care?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    8. Hiba Bawadi & Sara Elshami & Ahmed Awaisu & Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi & Shuja Ashfaq & Banan Mukhalalati, 2023. "A review of technical and quality assessment considerations of audio-visual and web-conferencing focus groups in qualitative health research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Revelli, Federico, 2008. "Performance competition in local media markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1585-1594, July.
    10. Poy, Samuele & Schüller, Simone, 2016. "Internet and Voting in the Web 2.0 Era: Evidence from a Local Broadband Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 9991, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Tiina Kymäläinen & Anu Seisto & Roosa Malila, 2021. "Generation Z Food Waste, Diet and Consumption Habits: A Finnish Social Design Study with Future Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Silvia Cataldi, 2018. "A proposal for the analysis of the relational dimension in the interview techniques: a pilot study on in-depth interviews and focus groups," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 295-312, January.
    13. Sayeda Sabrina Ali & Md. Raju Ahmad & Jalal Uddin Mohammad Shoaib & Mohammad Aliuzzaman Sheik & Mohammad Imam Hoshain & Rebecca L. Hall & Katrina A. Macintosh & Paul N. Williams, 2021. "Pandemic or Environmental Socio-Economic Stressors Which Have Greater Impact on Food Security in the Barishal Division of Bangladesh: Initial Perspectives from Agricultural Officers and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Joseph McMurray, 2017. "Ideology as Opinion: A Spatial Model of Common-Value Elections," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 108-140, November.
    15. Francesca Pagliara & Massimo Aria & Lucia Russo & Valentina Della Corte, 2021. "A theoretical model linking the development of the transportation system with citizens' trust in government actors," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 273-285, February.
    16. Matt Guardino & Suzanne Mettler, 2020. "Revealing the “Hidden welfare state†: How policy information influences public attitudes about tax expenditures," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    17. Tristan Canare & Ronald U. Mendoza, 2022. "Access to Information and Other Correlates of Vote Buying and Selling Behaviour: Insights from Philippine Data," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 34(2), pages 139-161, July.
    18. Joseph McMurray, 2015. "The paradox of information and voter turnout," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 13-23, October.
    19. Shrivastava, Ritu & Sharma, Lochan & Jolly, Mehak & Ahuja, Romi & Sharma, Radhika & Naslund, John A. & Agrawal, Jyotsna & Shidhaye, Rahul & Mehrotra, Seema & Hollon, Steve D. & Patel, Vikram & Tugnawa, 2023. "“We are everyone's ASHAs but who's there for us?” a qualitative exploration of perceptions of work stress and coping among rural frontline workers in Madhya Pradesh, India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    20. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Price promises, trust deficits and energy justice: Public perceptions of hydrogen homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:125-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.