IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v134y2024i664p3096-3136..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccination Policy, Delayed Care and Health Expenditures

Author

Listed:
  • Erkmen G Aslim
  • Wei Fu
  • Chia-Lun Liu
  • Erdal Tekin

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the individual propensity to delay or skip medical care. Our research design exploits the arguably exogenous variation in age-specific vaccine eligibility rollout across states and over time as an instrument for individual vaccination status. We find that receiving a COVID-19 vaccine reduces the likelihood of delaying care for any medical condition by 37%. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that children are significantly less likely to delay or skip healthcare as a result of their parents becoming vaccine eligible, indicating the presence of a positive health spillover within households that extends beyond protection against infection. Our analysis also shows that vaccination reduces concerns about contracting or spreading COVID-19, leading to increased mobility and potentially reducing delays or avoidance in seeking healthcare. Additionally, we find that vaccination notably increased access to elective care and surgeries, but had no significant impact on emergency department admissions, mental health cases or other medical conditions. Our results highlight the important role that vaccines play in, not only protecting against coronavirus, but also safeguarding against the worsening of health due to delayed or foregone medical care. The decline in delayed or foregone care caused by vaccination is particularly strong among minorities and those with a low socioeconomic background, revealing an important role that vaccination efforts can play in narrowing inequities in health and healthcare. In supplementary analysis, we use novel data on debit and credit card spending to demonstrate that increased vaccine uptake has a positive, albeit statistically insignificant, effect on consumer healthcare spending in the short run. Taken together, our findings imply that advancements in vaccine development coupled with a regulatory process that accelerates the availability of vaccines to the public in a safe manner can have the additional benefit of tackling unmet healthcare needs during a public health crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkmen G Aslim & Wei Fu & Chia-Lun Liu & Erdal Tekin, 2024. "Vaccination Policy, Delayed Care and Health Expenditures," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(664), pages 3096-3136.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:664:p:3096-3136.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:664:p:3096-3136.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.