IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v139y2024i2p829-889..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Impacts of COVID-19: Evidence from a New Public Database Built Using Private Sector Data

Author

Listed:
  • Raj Chetty
  • John N Friedman
  • Michael Stepner
  • Opportunity Insights Team
  • Camille Baker
  • Harvey Barnhard
  • Matt Bell
  • Gregory Bruich
  • Tina Chelidze
  • Lucas Chu
  • Westley Cineus
  • Sebi Devlin-Foltz
  • Michael Droste
  • Dhruv Gaur
  • Federico Gonzalez
  • Rayshauna Gray
  • Abigail Hiller
  • Matthew Jacob
  • Tyler Jacobson
  • Margaret Kallus
  • Fiona Kastel
  • Laura Kincaide
  • Caitlin Kupsc
  • Sarah LaBauve
  • Lucía Lamas
  • Maddie Marino
  • Kai Matheson
  • Jared Miller
  • Christian Mott
  • Kate Musen
  • Danny Onorato
  • Sarah Oppenheimer
  • Trina Ott
  • Lynn Overmann
  • Max Pienkny
  • Jeremiah Prince
  • Sebastian Puerta
  • Daniel Reuter
  • Peter Ruhm
  • Tom Rutter
  • Emanuel Schertz
  • Shannon Felton Spence
  • Krista Stapleford
  • Kamelia Stavreva
  • Ceci Steyn
  • James Stratton
  • Clare Suter
  • Elizabeth Thach
  • Nicolaj Thor
  • Amanda Wahlers
  • Kristen Watkins
  • Alanna Williams
  • David Williams
  • Chase Williamson
  • Shady Yassin
  • Ruby Zhang
  • Austin Zheng

Abstract

We build a publicly available database that tracks economic activity in the United States at a granular level in real time using anonymized data from private companies. We report weekly statistics on consumer spending, business revenues, job postings, and employment rates disaggregated by county, sector, and income group. Using the publicly available data, we show how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the economy by analyzing heterogeneity in its effects across subgroups. High-income individuals reduced spending sharply in March 2020, particularly in sectors that require in-person interaction. This reduction in spending greatly reduced the revenues of small businesses in affluent, dense areas. Those businesses laid off many of their employees, leading to widespread job losses, especially among low-wage workers in such areas. High-wage workers experienced a V-shaped recession that lasted a few weeks, whereas low-wage workers experienced much larger, more persistent job losses. Even though consumer spending and job postings had recovered fully by December 2021, employment rates in low-wage jobs remained depressed in areas that were initially hard hit, indicating that the temporary fall in labor demand led to a persistent reduction in labor supply. Building on this diagnostic analysis, we evaluate the effects of fiscal stimulus policies designed to stem the downward spiral in economic activity. Cash stimulus payments led to sharp increases in spending early in the pandemic, but much smaller responses later in the pandemic, especially for high-income households. Real-time estimates of marginal propensities to consume provided better forecasts of the impacts of subsequent rounds of stimulus payments than historical estimates. Overall, our findings suggest that fiscal policies can stem secondary declines in consumer spending and job losses, but cannot restore full employment when the initial shock to consumer spending arises from health concerns. More broadly, our analysis demonstrates how public statistics constructed from private sector data can support many research and real-time policy analyses, providing a new tool for empirical macroeconomics.

Suggested Citation

  • Raj Chetty & John N Friedman & Michael Stepner & Opportunity Insights Team & Camille Baker & Harvey Barnhard & Matt Bell & Gregory Bruich & Tina Chelidze & Lucas Chu & Westley Cineus & Sebi Devlin-Fol, 2024. "The Economic Impacts of COVID-19: Evidence from a New Public Database Built Using Private Sector Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(2), pages 829-889.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:139:y:2024:i:2:p:829-889.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjad048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:139:y:2024:i:2:p:829-889.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.