IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2020i2p278-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Academic Profession as Perceived by Faculty

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Kochukhova

Abstract

Elena Kochukhova - Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy, Senior Researcher, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.Address: 16 Sofyi Kovalevskoy Str., 620049 Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation. E-mail: elenascause@yandex.ruThis paper analyzes the findings from a study of faculty's perceptions of teaching as the most significant component of the academic profession. In a broader context, it investigates into the transformation of the academic profession, meaning that professors in Russia as well as around the world tend to perform research, administrative, and expert functions more and more often. Previously, Russian researchers observed a conflict between faculty's perception of teaching as the most important profession component and administrators' publication productivity requirements. A number of publications present strategies that professors use to adjust to the changing administrative requirements. However, the existing findings mostly reflect administrators' perception of the academic profession, on which the faculty's perspective is considered to be implicitly dependent. Available literature offers little evidence of how professors perceive the content, meaning, and goals of the academic profession. The present study was designed to find out by which goals and norms faculty members are guided in doing their work and to determine the logic behind the way they allocate their efforts among various aspects of teaching. Data was collected using focused in-depth interviews carried out in a Yekaterinburg university. Research was performed within a methodological framework of grounded theory and narrative analysis which traces its origin to hermeneutics. Findings indicate that professors share similar perceptions of the skills necessary to do their work, the goals of teaching, and the criteria for maintaining educational quality. Meanwhile, there is no platform for building those perceptions, faculty's attitudes being shaped under the influence of their mentors and personal experience. The study also evaluates the impact of other university actors (students, colleagues, administrators) on the respondents' perceptions of the teaching process. Finally, a rationale for building professional solidarity within the university's academic community is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Kochukhova, 2020. "The Academic Profession as Perceived by Faculty," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 278-302.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2020:i:2:p:278-302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2020/07/09/1595125920/Kochukhova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizaveta Sivak & Maria Yudkevich, 2009. "Academic Inbreeding: Pro and Contra," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 170-187.
    2. Natalia Forrat, 2009. "Problems of Higher Education Quality: World Challenges and Their Russian Transformations," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 121-138.
    3. Vadim Radaev & Sergei Medvedev & Ekaterina Talalakina & Andrei Dementiev, 2018. "My Five Major Challenges as a Teacher Discussion. Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, September 8, 2017," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 200-233.
    4. Rob Euwals & Melanie Ward, 2005. "What matters most: teaching or research? Empirical evidence on the remuneration of British academics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(14), pages 1655-1672.
    5. Elizaveta Sivak & Maria Yudkevich, 2013. "Academic Profession in a Comparative Perspective: 1992–2012," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 38-47.
    6. Yana Kozmina, 2014. "Preferences of Professors about Research and Teaching," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 135-151.
    7. Catherine D. Rawn & Joanne A. Fox, 2018. "Understanding the Work and Perceptions of Teaching Focused Faculty in a Changing Academic Landscape," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 591-622, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Кочухова Е. С., 2020. "Академическая Профессия Глазами Преподавателей," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 278-302.
    2. Epifanio, Mariaelisa & Troeger, Vera E, 2013. "How much do children really cost? Maternity benefits and career opportunities of women in academia," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 171, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    3. Olga Alipova & Lada Litvinova & Andrey Lovakov & Maria Yudkevich, 2018. "Inbreds And Non-Inbreds Among Russian Academics: Short-Term Similarity And Long-Term Differences In Productivity," HSE Working papers WP BRP 48/EDU/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Fouad El Ouardighi & Konstantin Kogan & Radu Vranceanu, 2013. "Publish or Teach ? : Analysis of the Professor's Optimal Career Plan," Working Papers hal-00823514, HAL.
    5. Borenstein, Denis & Perlin, Marcelo S. & Imasato, Takeyoshi, 2022. "The Academic Inbreeding Controversy: Analysis and Evidence from Brazil," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    6. Palali, Ali & van Elk, Roel & Bolhaar, Jonneke & Rud, Iryna, 2018. "Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 40-49.
    7. Charissa Samaniego & Peggy Lindner & Maryam A. Kazmi & Bobbie A. Dirr & Dejun Tony Kong & Evonzia Jeff-Eke & Christiane Spitzmueller, 2023. "Higher research productivity = more pay? Gender pay-for-productivity inequity across disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1395-1407, February.
    8. Finn Christensen & James Manley & Louise Laurence, 2011. "The Allocation of Merit Pay in Academia: A Case Study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(2), pages 1548-1562.
    9. De Fraja, Gianni & Valbonesi, Paola, 2012. "The design of the university system," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 317-330.
    10. Olga Gorelova, 2016. "Cross-University Mobility of University Teaching Staff in Russia," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 229-258.
    11. repec:hal:journl:hal-00823514 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ali Palali & Roel van Elk & Jonneke Bolhaar & Iryna Rud, 2017. "Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality," CPB Discussion Paper 347.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Evgeny Balatsky, 2017. "Scientific Staff Career Regulation: Foreign Experience," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 12(4), pages 48-65, December.
    14. F. Aleskerov & I. Frumin & E. Kardanova, 2016. "Heterogeneity of the educational system: an introduction to the problem," Papers 1701.07322, arXiv.org.
    15. Félix Zurita-Ortega & Eva María Olmedo-Moreno & Ramón Chacón-Cuberos & Jorge Expósito López & Asunción Martínez-Martínez, 2019. "Relationship between Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Teachers in Universities and Other Educational Centres: A Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Danula K. Gamage & Georgios Kavetsos & Sushanta Mallick & Almudena Sevilla, 2024. "Pay transparency intervention and the gender pay gap: Evidence from research‐intensive universities in the UK," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 293-318, June.
    17. repec:hig:wpaper:32edu2015 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Natalia Maloshonok & Evgeniy Terentev, 2019. "Towards the New Model of Doctoral Education: The Experience of Enhancing Doctoral Programs in Russian Universities," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 8-42.
    19. Finn Christensen & James Manley & Louise Laurence, 2010. "The Allocation of Merit Pay in Academia," Working Papers 2010-13, Towson University, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2010.
    20. Малошонок Н. Г. & Терентьев Е. А., 2019. "На Пути К Новой Модели Аспирантуры: Опыт Совершенствования Аспирантских Программ В Российских Вузах," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 8-42.
    21. Gamage, Danula K. & Kavetsos, Georgios & Mallick, Sushanta & Sevilla, Almudena, 2020. "Pay Transparency Initiative and Gender Pay Gap: Evidence from Research-Intensive Universities in the UK," IZA Discussion Papers 13635, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    22. Соколов М. М., 2019. "Трансформирующие И Селективные Системы: Исследование По Сравнительной Социологии Академических Рынков И Карьер," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 35-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2020:i:2:p:278-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.