IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/hrr888/v3y2019i1p58-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture, Motivational Attributes and Employees¡¯ Perception towards CSR Practices: Evidence From Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sultana Jabeen
  • Danish Ahmed Siddiqui

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the employees¨Ccorporate social responsibility (CSR) relationship by studying the influence of two cultural values ¨C collectivism and masculinity ¨Con the formation of CSR perceptions. We adopted theoretical framework proposed by Hur and Kim (2017), in which Hofstede¡¯s cultural framework was proposed to explain the effect of the cultural values on employees¡¯ perceptions of CSR practices with the mediatory role of motivational attributions. To establish this framework empirically on Pakistan, a survey questionnaire was used to collect data from 190 employees¡¯ in Pakistan. Data analysis was performed using SEM and CFA. The results indicate that collectivistic (masculine) values were positively (negatively) related to perceptions of CSR. Furthermore, intrinsic attributions of CSR initiatives mediate the positive relationship between collectivism and CSR perceptions and the negative relationship between masculinity and CSR perceptions. These findings suggest that managers must seek to understand employees¡¯ cultural characteristics and the attributions of CSR motivations in order to engage them in driving CSR practices effectively and displaying a positive image of organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sultana Jabeen & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2019. "Culture, Motivational Attributes and Employees¡¯ Perception towards CSR Practices: Evidence From Pakistan," Human Resource Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 58-83, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:hrr888:v:3:y:2019:i:1:p:58-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/hrr/article/view/15785
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/hrr/article/view/15785
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junfeng Zhang, 2010. "Employee Orientation and Performance: An Exploration of the Mediating Role of Customer Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 111-121, February.
    2. Geert Hofstede, 1985. "The Interaction Between National And Organizational Value Systems[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 347-357, July.
    3. Bert Scholtens & Lammertjan Dam, 2007. "Cultural Values and International Differences in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 273-284, October.
    4. Muddassar Sarfraz & Wang Qun & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Adnan Tariq Alvi, 2018. "Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Employee Outcomes: Mediating Role of Organizational Justice for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Eilbirt, Henry & Parket, I. Robert, 1973. "The practice of business : The current status of corporate social responsibility," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 5-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takuma Kimura & Mizuki Nishikawa, 2018. "Ethical Leadership and Its Cultural and Institutional Context: An Empirical Study in Japan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 707-724, September.
    2. Meyer, Margit & Waßmann, Jan, 2011. "Strategische Corporate Social Responsibility. Konzeptionelle Entwicklung und Implementierung in der Praxis am Beispiel 'dm-drogerie markt'," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 3/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.
    3. Qinghua Zhu & Hang Yin & Junjun Liu & Kee‐hung Lai, 2014. "How is Employee Perception of Organizational Efforts in Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Their Satisfaction and Loyalty Towards Developing Harmonious Society in Chinese Enterprises?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 28-40, January.
    4. Stephanie Kelley, 2022. "Employee Perceptions of the Effective Adoption of AI Principles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 871-893, July.
    5. Yuan-Shuh Lii & May-Ching Ding & Chih-Huang Lin, 2018. "Fair or Unfair: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable CSR Practices on Anticipatory Justice Following Service Failure Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Hammad S. Alotaibi & Nadine Campbell, 2022. "Organizational Culture towards Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030: Evidence from National Water Company," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, December.
    7. İpek, İlayda & Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, Nilay, 2020. "Export market orientation: An integrative review and directions for future research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    8. Bert Scholtens & Riikka Sievänen, 2013. "Drivers of Socially Responsible Investing: A Case Study of Four Nordic Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 605-616, July.
    9. Chiara D’Angelo & Diletta Gazzaroli & Caterina Gozzoli, 2020. "Organisational Welfare in Italian SMEs: The Process of Valorising Human Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Hamad Alhumoudi, 2017. "External Social Accounting Developments: Analysis and Discussion of Academic Critiques," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 33-45, June.
    11. Lillian Y. Fok & Dinah M. Payne & Christy M. Corey, 2016. "Cultural Values, Utilitarian Orientation, and Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of U.S. and Puerto Rican Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 263-279, March.
    12. Chu Chen & Giorgio Gotti & Tony Kang & Michael C. Wolfe, 2018. "Corporate Codes of Ethics, National Culture, and Earnings Discretion: International Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 141-163, August.
    13. Fasilat Aramide Sanusi & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2020. "A proposed framework for assessing the influence of internal corporate social responsibility belief on employee intention to job continuity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2437-2449, November.
    14. Shin, Jiyoung & Moon, Jon Jungbien & Kang, Jingoo, 2023. "Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    15. Kenji Fujita & Listyoko Wisnu Aji & Win Aung Kyaw, 2009. "Primary Study of Leader and Follower Relationship in Asia: Empirical Study on Managers at AEON in Asian Countries," Working Papers EMS_2009_06, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    16. Virginia Bodolica & Martin Spraggon, 2015. "An Examination into the Disclosure, Structure, and Contents of Ethical Codes in Publicly Listed Acquiring Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 459-472, February.
    17. Laurent Karsenty, 2013. "How to apprehend trust at work? [Comment appréhender la confiance au travail ?]," Post-Print hal-04464235, HAL.
    18. Isac Florin Lucian & Remes Eugen Florin, 2017. "Culture and business ethics – a comparative perspective," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 54-65, September.
    19. Vitolla, Filippo & Raimo, Nicola & Rubino, Michele & Garegnani, Giovanni Maria, 2021. "Do cultural differences impact ethical issues? Exploring the relationship between national culture and quality of code of ethics," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    20. Samar El Sayad & Ahmed Diab, 2022. "Bank Employee Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence from Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-32, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:hrr888:v:3:y:2019:i:1:p:58-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/hrr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.