IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v23y2023i1d10.1007_s11115-021-00576-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logics and Agency in Public Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Kinder

    (Tampere University)

  • Jari Stenvall

    (Tampere University)

  • Antti Talonen

    (University of Helsinki)

Abstract

The article analyses the negative effects of the use of logics in public organisation research on active human agency. We build up a new conceptual model with which to approach logics in current research on organising public services; suggesting ways in which current models using logics in public organisation research can be strengthened. Our contribution is two-fold: we argue that Elder-Vass’ approach benefits from close synthesis with social learning theory (including recent thinking on trust, emotions, and distributed learning) and secondly, that grounding all usage of logics in logic-of-practice helps avoid a reification of logics and thirdly that situated learning better suits public organisation problem solving that the application of ‘new’ universal solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Kinder & Jari Stenvall & Antti Talonen, 2023. "Logics and Agency in Public Management Research," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 159-180, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:23:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11115-021-00576-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-021-00576-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-021-00576-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-021-00576-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    2. ., 2003. "Coordination routines: governance," Chapters, in: Economic Institutions and Complexity, chapter 5, pages 70-81, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Tom Christensen, 2021. "The Social Policy Response to COVID-19 – The Failure to Help Vulnerable Children and Elderly People," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 707-722, December.
    4. Alan Greenspan, 2002. "Corporate governance," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(03), pages 3-6, October.
    5. Dag Ingvar Jacobsen, 2021. "Motivational Differences? Comparing Private, Public and Hybrid Organizations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 561-575, September.
    6. Bjerregaard, Toke, 2011. "Co-existing institutional logics and agency among top-level public servants: A praxeological approach," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 194-209, March.
    7. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570310492344 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Sue Llewelyn, 2003. "What counts as “theory” in qualitative management and accounting research? Introducing five levels of theorizing," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 662-708, October.
    9. Paola Mattei & Lorenzo Vigevano, 2021. "Contingency Planning and Early Crisis Management: Italy and the COVID-19 Pandemic," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 647-663, December.
    10. Vargo, Stephen L. & Maglio, Paul P. & Akaka, Melissa Archpru, 2008. "On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 145-152, June.
    11. March, James G. & Olson, Johan P., 1983. "Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(2), pages 281-296, June.
    12. ., 2003. "System patterns: dominant governmental direction," Chapters, in: Economic Institutions and Complexity, chapter 7, pages 97-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What's New?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 299-317, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiwandari Handayani & S. P. Dewi & Bintang Septiarani, 2023. "Toward adaptive water governance: An examination on stakeholders engagement and interactions in Semarang City, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1914-1943, February.
    2. Kenji Otsuka, 2022. "Co‐optation in co‐production: Maintaining credibility and legitimacy in transboundary environmental governance in East Asia," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 771-797, November.
    3. Didier Wernli & Lucas Böttcher & Flore Vanackere & Yuliya Kaspiarovich & Maria Masood & Nicolas Levrat, 2023. "Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: A complexity perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 207-228, May.
    4. Francesco Polese & Luca Carrubbo & Francesco Caputo & Debora Sarno, 2018. "Managing Healthcare Service Ecosystems: Abstracting a Sustainability-Based View from Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Amendola, Carlo & Calabrese, Mario & Caputo, Francesco & Fabrizio, D’Ascenzo, 2018. "Fashion companies and customer satisfaction: A relation mediated by Information and Communication Technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 251-257.
    7. Pinna, Roberta & De Simone, Silvia & Cicotto, Gianfranco & Malik, Ashish, 2020. "Beyond organisational support: Exploring the supportive role of co-workers and supervisors in a multi-actor service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 524-534.
    8. Thomas Schulz & Markus Böhm & Heiko Gewald & Zehra Celik & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "The Negative Effects of Institutional Logic Multiplicity on Service Platforms in Intermodal Mobility Ecosystems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(5), pages 417-433, October.
    9. Hsin-Hui Chou & Chao-Chin Huang & Pei-Yun Tu, 2023. "Towards becoming a service-dominant enterprise: an actor engagement perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 607-632, June.
    10. Kazem Haki & Michael Blaschke & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 487-502, August.
    11. Schulz, Thomas & Zimmermann, Sina & Böhm, Markus & Gewald, Heiko & Krcmar, Helmut, 2021. "Value co-creation and co-destruction in service ecosystems: The case of the Reach Now app," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Francesco Polese & Debora Sarno & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2018. "From B2B to A4A: An Integrated Framework for Viable Value Co-Creation," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 135-161.
    13. Montserrat Díaz-Méndez & Mario R. Paredes & Michael Saren, 2019. "Improving Society by Improving Education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the Role of Students in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Mele, Cristina & Russo Spena, Tiziana & Kaartemo, Valtteri & Marzullo, Maria Luisa, 2021. "Smart nudging: How cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 949-960.
    15. Jacob Torfing & Christopher Ansell & Eva Sørensen, 2024. "Metagoverning the Co-Creation of Green Transitions: A Socio-Political Contingency Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Daniela Rupo & Mirko Perano & Giovanna Centorrino & Alfonso Vargas-Sanchez, 2018. "A Framework Based on Sustainability, Open Innovation, and Value Cocreation Paradigms—A Case in an Italian Maritime Cluster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Francesco Polese & Antonio Botti & Mara Grimaldi & Antonella Monda & Massimiliano Vesci, 2018. "Social Innovation in Smart Tourism Ecosystems: How Technology and Institutions Shape Sustainable Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Jörg Finsterwalder & Alastair G. Tombs, 2021. "Infusing tribal reciprocity into service research: towards an integrated and dynamic view of repayment, retaliation and restorative justice for regenerative service ecosystem wellbeing," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(4), pages 563-586, December.
    19. Simon Michalke & Lisa Lohrenz & Christoph Lattemann & Susanne Robra-Bissantz, 2022. "Exploring engagement, well-being, and welfare on engagement platforms: Insight into the personal service sector from the DACH region," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2429-2444, December.
    20. Thomas Schulz & Markus Böhm & Heiko Gewald & Helmut Krcmar, 2021. "Smart mobility – an analysis of potential customers’ preference structures," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 105-124, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:23:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11115-021-00576-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.