IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v14y2020i1p60-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-Based Determinants of Future Intention to Use Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Ejdys

    (Bialystok University of Technology (Poland))

Abstract

It is widely recognized that one of the factors determining current and future socioeconomic development is the level of digitalization shaping a new type of society — the information society. One area of ICT application within information society is e-Government. A relatively low level of development of e-Government services in Poland was behind the search for the causes of this phenomenon. Among many technological, organizational, human, economic, social, and cultural factors determining the development of e-Government, many researchers indicated trust as one of the most critical factors. Mistrust is perceived as a basic limitation for the implementation of e-Government solutions. The author’s object of interest was e-Declaration technology, which enables electronic filling and sending of tax returns to tax authorities. This article investigates the relationship between the features of technology users and their trust in the e-Declaration technology and their future intention to use the technology. The researched user traits refer to their general trust, overall trust in technology and science development, and their experience and trust in the internet. Data was collected with the use of the CATI (Computer Assisted Web Interview) technique. Altogether, 1,054 completed questionnaires were selected, containing 100% of the answers. The regression analysis was preceded by an analysis of correlations between variables. The hypotheses were confirmed using the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test. The obtained results confirmed positive relationships between Trust in e-Declaration (T) and all tested constructs: General Trust (GT), overall Trust in Science and Technology (TST), Trust in the Internet (TinI) and Internet Experience (IE). Results also confirmed a positive impact of Trust in e-Declaration (T) on the Future Intention (FI) to use the technology. In the adopted regression model, Trust in the Internet was recognized as a key factor in the success of e-Government development. Therefore, the Polish government, which offers solutions in the field of e-Government and wants to increase trust in the technology as well as extend future adaptations of the technology, should concentrate on building trust in the internet and the development of technology and science in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Ejdys, 2020. "Trust-Based Determinants of Future Intention to Use Technology," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 60-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:60-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2020/04/01/1568411858/4-Ejdys-60-68.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alzahrani, Latifa & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2017. "Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 164-175.
    2. V.V. Ravi Kumar & Anurag Lall & Tanmay Mane, 2017. "Extending the TAM Model: Intention of Management Students to Use Mobile Banking: Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 238-249, February.
    3. Hengstler, Monika & Enkel, Ellen & Duelli, Selina, 2016. "Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-120.
    4. Pusp Raj Joshi & Shareeful Islam, 2018. "E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Joanna Ejdys & Katarzyna Halicka, 2018. "Sustainable Adaptation of New Technology—The Case of Humanoids Used for the Care of Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dzandu, Michael D., 2023. "Antecedent, behaviour, and consequence (a-b-c) of deploying the contact tracing app in response to COVID-19: Evidence from Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Oana-Ramona LOBONT & Alexandra-Madalina TARAN & Florin COSTEA, 2020. "E-Government Research Still Matter? A Bibliometric Analysis," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 58-63.
    3. Blume, Maximilian & Oberländer, Anna Maria & Röglinger, Maximilian & Rosemann, Michael & Wyrtki, Katrin, 2020. "Ex ante assessment of disruptive threats: Identifying relevant threats before one is disrupted," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Erik Karger & Marvin Jagals & Frederik Ahlemann, 2021. "Blockchain for Smart Mobility—Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    5. Noushin Javidi & Younes Mohammadzadeh, 2022. "The effect of virtualization of organizational performance on organizational stability through the synergy of human capital and organizational wisdom organization in sports organizations," Technium Sustainability, Technium Science, vol. 2(1), pages 13-30, January.
    6. Liu, Peng & Xu, Zhigang & Zhao, Xiangmo, 2019. "Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 354-369.
    7. Glyptis, Loukas & Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Giudice, Manlio Del & Dimitriou, Salomi & Michael, Panayiota, 2020. "E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Antonio Ariza Montes & Heesup Han, 2021. "The Role of Expected Benefits towards Smart Hotels in Shaping Customer Behavior: Comparison by Age and Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Baseer Ahmad Baheer & David Lamas & Sónia Sousa, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Pelau, Corina & Ene, Irina, 2018. "Consumers’ perception on human-like artificial intelligence devices," MPRA Paper 94617, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Phan, Duong & Bab-Hadiashar, Alireza & Lai, Chow Yin & Crawford, Bryn & Hoseinnezhad, Reza & Jazar, Reza N. & Khayyam, Hamid, 2020. "Intelligent energy management system for conventional autonomous vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Arnold Tóth & Tímea Juhász & Botond Kálmán, 2020. "Determinants Of Financial Habits," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 237-256.
    14. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    15. Pillai, Rajasshrie & Sivathanu, Brijesh & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2020. "Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. David Mhlanga, 2022. "Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: The Superlative Approach to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Patrycja Kokot-Stępień & Luiza Piersiala, 2019. "Analiza funkcjonowania technologii informacyjnych w administracji publicznej," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 56, pages 91-103.
    18. Jinsoo Hwang & Hyunjoon Kim, 2020. "The Effects of Expected Benefits on Image, Desire, and Behavioral Intentions in the Field of Drone Food Delivery Services after the Outbreak of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. BARCEVICIUS Egidijus & CIBAITE Guonda & CODAGNONE Cristiano & GINEIKYTE Vaida & KLIMAVICIUTE Luka & LIVA Giovanni & MATULEVIC Loreta & MISURACA Gianluca & VANINI Irene, 2019. "Exploring Digital Government transformation in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC118857, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Abdul Gaffar Khan & Reshma Pervin Lima & Md Shahed Mahmud, 2021. "Understanding the Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction of Mobile Banking in Bangladesh: Using a Structural Equation Model," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(1), pages 85-100, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    user intentions; trust in technology; e-government; general trust; Internet experience; trust in the Internet;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:60-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.