Author
Listed:
- Teng Yu
(Guangzhou College of Commerce
Universiti Sains Malaysia
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jinan University)
- Ai Ping Teoh
(Universiti Sains Malaysia)
- Chengliang Wang
(East China Normal University)
- Qing Bian
(Guangzhou College of Commerce)
Abstract
This study investigates the factors influencing users’ behavioral intention to adopt facial recognition payment (FRP) in smart hospitals, considering convenience and potential risks. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), the diffusion of innovations theory, and trust theory are employed to identify critical factors for promoting FRP adoption. A quantitative cross-sectional survey is conducted among smart hospital users in China, collecting 811 valid questionnaires, and the partial least squares structural equation method (PLS-SEM) is utilized for analysis. The results show that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions positively affect behavioral intention. Privacy concerns and perceived risks negatively impact trust in FRP, while familiarity enhances trust. Trust in FRP and personal innovativeness positively influence behavioral intention, with personal innovativeness moderating the trust-behavioral intention relationship. The findings emphasize the mediating role of trust in FRP and the importance of familiarity and personal innovativeness in driving FRP adoption. Gender (male or female) does not significantly impact the relationships and path coefficients in the model. However, slight discrepancies are observed between the permutation test and Henseler’s MGA in terms of the effect of privacy concerns on trust in FRP. This research contributes to the literature on users’ behavioral intentions, aiding smart hospitals in promoting FRP adoption while considering user concerns.
Suggested Citation
Teng Yu & Ai Ping Teoh & Chengliang Wang & Qing Bian, 2024.
"Convenient or risky? Investigating the behavioral intention to use facial recognition payment in smart hospitals,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03910-9
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03910-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03910-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.