IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v3y2022i1p16-242d749665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Customer Satisfaction and eWOM in the Sharing Economy: Timeshare versus Peer-to-Peer Accommodations

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Redditt

    (Rosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32819, USA)

  • Marissa Orlowski

    (Rosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32819, USA)

  • Alan Fyall

    (Rosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32819, USA)

  • Amy M. Gregory

    (Rosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32819, USA)

  • Heejung Ro

    (Rosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32819, USA)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the differential effects of determinants of satisfaction on subsequent electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) behavior in the sharing economy with peer-to-peer accommodations and timeshares. Data were collected from consumers who stayed at either a timeshare or peer-to-peer accommodation within the previous year (N = 785). Structural equation modeling was used to test the relationship between the determinants and eWOM through satisfaction, followed by multiple-group comparison to examine the moderating effect of accommodation type. The results indicated that amenities, economic benefits, and trust demonstrated an indirect effect on eWOM behavior through satisfaction, but community belonging affected eWOM behavior directly. Multiple-group SEM revealed that accommodation type moderated the indirect effects of community belonging, economic benefits, and trust on eWOM behavior, such that the indirect effect was significant only for timeshare accommodations. This study contributes to the sharing economy literature by filling the gap of lodging research beyond Airbnb and including timeshares. The findings highlight competitive differences that influence eWOM between peer-to-peer accommodations and timeshares that otherwise offer similar home-like accommodations. The study revealed a newly found direct relationship between community belonging and eWOM.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Redditt & Marissa Orlowski & Alan Fyall & Amy M. Gregory & Heejung Ro, 2022. "Determinants of Customer Satisfaction and eWOM in the Sharing Economy: Timeshare versus Peer-to-Peer Accommodations," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:3:y:2022:i:1:p:16-242:d:749665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/3/1/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/3/1/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    2. Hyun-Jeong Ban & Hayeon Choi & Eun-Kyong Choi & Sanghyeop Lee & Hak-Seon Kim, 2019. "Investigating Key Attributes in Experience and Satisfaction of Hotel Customer Using Online Review Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Zhu, Yunxia & Cheng, Mingming & Wang, Jie & Ma, Laikun & Jiang, Ruochen, 2019. "The construction of home feeling by Airbnb guests in the sharing economy: A semantics perspective," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 308-321.
    4. Sparks, Beverley & Bradley, Graham & Jennings, Gayle, 2011. "Consumer value and self-image congruency at different stages of timeshare ownership," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1176-1185.
    5. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    6. Juho Hamari & Mimmi Sjöklint & Antti Ukkonen, 2016. "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2047-2059, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pourjahanshahi, Fatemeh & Mollahosseini, Ali & Dehyadegari, Saeid, 2023. "Website quality and users' intention to use digital libraries: Examining users’ attitudes, online co-creation experiences, and eWOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Toni & Maria Francesca Renzi & Laura Di Pietro & Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Giovanni Mattia, 2021. "The Relation between Collaborative Consumption and Subjective Well-Being: An Analysis of P2P Accommodation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    3. Daisy Bertrand & Pierre-Yves Léo & Jean Philippe, 2019. "The New Go-Between Services: Peer-To-Peer Sharing Platforms In Hospitality Services," Post-Print hal-02299130, HAL.
    4. Lindblom, Arto & Lindblom, Taru & Wechtler, Heidi, 2018. "Collaborative consumption as C2C trading: Analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 244-252.
    5. Sengupta, Pooja & Biswas, Baidyanath & Kumar, Ajay & Shankar, Ravi & Gupta, Shivam, 2021. "Examining the predictors of successful Airbnb bookings with Hurdle models: Evidence from Europe, Australia, USA and Asia-Pacific cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 538-554.
    6. Francesca De Canio & Davide Pellegrini & Elisa Martinelli, 2018. "Is the collaborative consumption the new buying? Social and economic aspects influencing collaborative consumption," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 19-38.
    7. Stéphanie Nguyen & Sylvie Llosa, 2018. "On The Difficulty To Define The Sharing Economy And Collaborative Consumption – Literature Review And Proposing A Different Approach With The Introduction Of 'Collaborative Services'
      [De La Difficu      ," Working Papers halshs-01820276, HAL.
    8. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Will “no-ownership†work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 66-73.
    9. Ni, Shaowen, 2021. "Collaborative consumption in China: An empirical investigation of its antecedents and consequences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Tünde Zita Kovács & Forest David & Adrián Nagy & István Szűcs & András Nábrádi, 2021. "An Analysis of the Demand-Side, Platform-Based Collaborative Economy: Creation of a Clear Classification Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Lee, Stacy H.N. & Chow, Pui-Sze, 2020. "Investigating consumer attitudes and intentions toward online fashion renting retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Matteo Corciolani & Stefania Borghini & Daniele Scarpi, 2018. "Buying, renting, and sharing: Investigating new forms of acquisition," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 13-18.
    13. Sirkeci Kübra & Arıkan Esra, 2021. "The Infinite Wardrobe: Female Consumers’ Value Perceptions Regarding Collaborative Consumption of Apparel," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 150-170, December.
    14. Kim, Eunjin & Yoon, Sungjun, 2021. "Social capital, user motivation, and collaborative consumption of online platform services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Patrizia Gazzola & Elena‐Mădălina Vătămănescu & Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Chiara Marrapodi, 2019. "Users' motivations to participate in the sharing economy: Moving from profits toward sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 741-751, July.
    16. Francesco Pasimeni, 2020. "The Origin of the Sharing Economy Meets the Legacy of Fractional Ownership," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-19, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    17. Fritze, Martin P. & Urmetzer, Florian & Khan, Gohar F. & Sarstedt, Marko & Neely, Andy & Schäfers, Tobias, 2018. "From Goods to Services Consumption: A Social Network Analysis on Sharing Economy and Servitization Research," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 2(3), pages 3-16.
    18. Michalak Szymon & Bartkowiak Paweł & Ankiel Magdalena & Olejniczak Tomasz & Stachowiak-Krzyżan Magda, 2022. "Motives for the Usage of Collaborative Fashion Consumption Online Platforms," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 44(2), pages 41-66, June.
    19. Dabbous, Amal & Tarhini, Abbas, 2019. "Assessing the impact of knowledge and perceived economic benefits on sustainable consumption through the sharing economy: A sociotechnical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2023. "Access or collaboration? A typology of sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:3:y:2022:i:1:p:16-242:d:749665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.