IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i9p1552-d110429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Equity Measure on Urban Ecological Space Layout Based on Accessibility of Socially Vulnerable Groups—A Case Study of Changting, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhua Yuan

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    Nanjing Engineering Consulting Center, Nanjing 210005, China)

  • Jiangang Xu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

  • Zhenbo Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

The improper layout of urban public parks leads to the difference between citizens sharing or not sharing this kind of public resource, particularly in the historical districts of mountainous cities in China. The purpose of this study is to explore the spatial equity and quantitative measures of urban public parks’ layouts by building a demand index of socially vulnerable groups sharing public parks based on the accessibility evaluation model. In this paper, Changting—a famous national historical and cultural city—is taken as the empirical object, then the accessibility and social equity of public parks is quantitatively measured with the aid of the field investigation method, the spatial analysis model of geographic information system (GIS) and the SPSS statistical analysis method. The results indicate that it is feasible to measure the spatial equity of urban public parks with the accessibility and demand index of socially vulnerable groups, and it can effectively characterize the rationality and social equity of urban ecological space. It shows that a degree of spatial mismatch exists between the distribution of urban public parks and that of residents, that is to say the spatial distribution of public parks is not equitable in terms of accessibility or residents’ demands. Therefore, the data suggest that the spatial patterns and accessibility levels of parks in Changting County—especially the historical districts—should be further improved and perfected to achieve high levels of accessibility and equity through urban green space system planning. The paper may be used as a scientific reference for the planning and construction of ecological urban spaces. It can also provide useful decision-making guidance for urban planners in investigating, analyzing, and adjusting the distribution of public service facilities to achieve equitable outcomes, while promoting the harmonious and sustainable development of mountainous cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhua Yuan & Jiangang Xu & Zhenbo Wang, 2017. "Spatial Equity Measure on Urban Ecological Space Layout Based on Accessibility of Socially Vulnerable Groups—A Case Study of Changting, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1552-:d:110429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jared Hewko & Karen E Smoyer-Tomic & M John Hodgson, 2002. "Measuring Neighbourhood Spatial Accessibility to Urban Amenities: Does Aggregation Error Matter?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(7), pages 1185-1206, July.
    2. M Truelove, 1993. "Measurement of Spatial Equity," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 11(1), pages 19-34, March.
    3. Kinman, Edward L., 1999. "Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 663-678, September.
    4. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    5. Anh T. Le & Paul W. Miller, 2005. "Participation in Higher Education: Equity and Access?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(253), pages 152-165, June.
    6. Kim, Chul-Woung & Lee, Sang-Yi & Hong, Seong-Chul, 2005. "Equity in utilization of cancer inpatient services by income classes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 187-200, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siqi Yu & Xigang Zhu & Qian He, 2020. "An Assessment of Urban Park Access Using House-Level Data in Urban China: Through the Lens of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2019. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Analyzing Questions of Justice Issues in Urban Greenspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Jun Yang & Andong Guo & Xueming Li & Tai Huang, 2018. "Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Nazmul Haque, Md. & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Justice in access to urban ecosystem services: A critical review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Haque, Md. Nazmul & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Xingchuan Gao & Tao Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2019. "Spatial Fairness and Changes in Transport Infrastructure in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Area from 1976 to 2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Elsa A. Pérez-Paredes & Aleksandra Krstikj, 2020. "Spatial Equity in Urban Public Space (UPS) Based on Analysis of Municipal Public Policy Omissions: A Case Study of Atizapán de Zaragoza, State of México," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    9. Buket Özdemir Işık & Sara Demir, 2017. "Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Sustainability of Historical–Cultural Structures on the Trabzon Coastline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    10. K M Atikur Rahman & Dunfu Zhang, 2018. "Analyzing the Level of Accessibility of Public Urban Green Spaces to Different Socially Vulnerable Groups of People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Sadooghi, Seyed Ehsan & Taleai, Mohammad & Abolhasani, Somaie, 2022. "Simulation of urban growth scenarios using integration of multi-criteria analysis and game theory," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Yan Xu & Weixuan Song & Chunhui Liu, 2018. "Social-Spatial Accessibility to Urban Educational Resources under the School District System: A Case Study of Public Primary Schools in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Jinghong Shen & Jianquan Cheng & Wencong Huang & Fantao Zeng, 2020. "An Exploration of Spatial and Social Inequalities of Urban Sports Facilities in Nanning City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Rashid A. Mushkani & Haruka Ono, 2021. "Spatial Equity of Public Parks: A Case Study of Kabul City, Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Liwen Liu & Ming Zhang, 2021. "The Impacts of High-Speed Rail on Regional Accessibility and Spatial Development—Updated Evidence from China’s Mid-Yangtze River City-Cluster Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Hongzan Jiao & Chengcong Li & Yang Yu & Zhenghong Peng, 2020. "Urban Public Green Space Equity against the Context of High-Speed Urbanization in Wuhan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunjoong Kim & Fahui Wang, 2019. "Disparity in Spatial Access to Public Daycare and Kindergarten across GIS-Constructed Regions in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Karner, Alex, 2018. "Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 24-32.
    3. Michiel N. Daams & Paolo Veneri, 2017. "Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch, Danish, and German Functional Urban Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 501-526, September.
    4. Andrea L. Sparks & Neil Bania & Laura Leete, 2011. "Comparative Approaches to Measuring Food Access in Urban Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(8), pages 1715-1737, June.
    5. Christopher M. Bacon & Gregory A. Baker, 2017. "The rise of food banks and the challenge of matching food assistance with potential need: towards a spatially specific, rapid assessment approach," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 899-919, December.
    6. Jacobson, Jerry Owen & Robinson, Paul & Bluthenthal, Ricky N., 2007. "A multilevel decomposition approach to estimate the role of program location and neighborhood disadvantage in racial disparities in alcohol treatment completion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 462-476, January.
    7. Buly A Cardak & Chris Ryan, 2007. "Participation in Higher Education: Equity and Access: Are Equity-based Scholarships an Answer?," Working Papers 2007.03, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    8. Maria Teresa Borzacchiello & Peter Nijkamp & Eric Koomen, 2010. "Accessibility and Urban Development: A Grid-Based Comparative Statistical Analysis of Dutch Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(1), pages 148-169, February.
    9. Richard Fry & Scott Orford & Sarah Rodgers & Jennifer Morgan & David Fone, 2020. "A best practice framework to measure spatial variation in alcohol availability," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 381-399, March.
    10. Juan D. Barón & Deborah Cobb-Clark, 2010. "Are Young People's Educational Outcomes Linked to their Sense of Control?," Borradores de Economia 599, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    11. Chen, Wendong & Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Cao, Mengqiu, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Jamie E L Spinney & Hugh Millward, 2013. "Investigating Travel Thresholds for Sports and Recreation Activities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(3), pages 474-488, June.
    13. Yoo Min Park & Mei-Po Kwan, 2020. "Understanding Racial Disparities in Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution: Considering the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Population Distribution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Brendan Houng & Moshe Justman, 2015. "Out-Of-Sample Predictions Of Access To Higher Education And School Value-Added," Working Papers 1511, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    15. Xavier Hollandts & Zied Guedri & Nicolas Aubert, 2011. "Les déterminants de la représentation des actionnaires salariés au Conseil d’administration ou de surveillance," Post-Print halshs-01256775, HAL.
    16. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Sajadi, Afshin, 2024. "Principles of just urban land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Teng Zhong & Guonian Lü & Xiuming Zhong & Haoming Tang & Yu Ye, 2020. "Measuring Human-Scale Living Convenience through Multi-Sourced Urban Data and a Geodesign Approach: Buildings as Analytical Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Holger Weckmüller & Carles Barriocanal & Roser Maneja & Martí Boada, 2019. "Factors Affecting Traditional Medicinal Plant Knowledge of the Waorani, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Catherine Deri Armstrong & Rose Anne Devlin & Forough Seifi, 2023. "Build it and they will come: Volunteer opportunities and volunteering," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 989-1006, August.
    20. Herbst, Chris M. & Tekin, Erdal, 2012. "The geographic accessibility of child care subsidies and evidence on the impact of subsidy receipt on childhood obesity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 37-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1552-:d:110429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.