IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v30y1998i4p595-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds

Author

Listed:
  • E Talen
  • L Anselin

Abstract

Geographical and political research on urban service delivery—who benefits and why—has proliferated during the past two decades. Overall, this literature is not characterized by a particular attention to the importance of method in drawing conclusions about spatial equity based on empirical studies. Specifically, there has been scant interest in the effect of geographic methodology on assessing the relationship between access and socioeconomic characteristics that are spatially defined. In this paper we take a spatial analytical perspective to evaluate the importance of methodology in assessing whether or not, or to what degree the distribution of urban public services is equitable. We approach this issue by means of an empirical case study of the spatial distribution of playgrounds in Tulsa, Oklahoma, relative to that of the targeted constituencies (children) and other socioeconomic indicators. In addition to the ‘traditional’ measure (count of facilities in an areal unit), we consider a potential measure (based on the gravity model), average travel distance, and distance to the nearest playground as indicators of accessibility. We find significant differences between the spatial patterns in these measures that are suggested by local indicators of spatial association and other techniques of exploratory spatial data analysis. The choice of access measure not only implies a particular treatment of spatial externalities but also affects conclusions about the existence of spatial mismatch and inequity.

Suggested Citation

  • E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:30:y:1998:i:4:p:595-613
    DOI: 10.1068/a300595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a300595
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a300595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David L. Barkley & Mark S. Henry & Shuming Bao & Kerry R. Brooks, 1995. "How Functional Are Economic Areas? Tests For Intra‐Regional Spatial Association Using Spatial Data Analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 297-316, October.
    2. Luc Anselin & Shuming Bao, 1997. "Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis Linking SpaceStat and ArcView," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis, chapter 3, pages 35-59, Springer.
    3. Mladenka, Kenneth R., 1980. "The Urban Bureaucracy and the Chicago Political Machine: Who Gets What and the Limits to Political Control," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 991-998, December.
    4. Von Hohenbalken, Balder & West, Douglas S., 1984. "Manhattan versus Euclid : Market areas computed and compared," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 19-35, February.
    5. Anselin, Luc & Getis, Arthur, 1992. "Spatial Statistical Analysis and Geographic Information Systems," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 26(1), pages 19-33, April.
    6. Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), 1997. "Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03499-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:asg:wpaper:1047 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Michael F. Goodchild & Luc Anselin & Richard P. Appelbaum & Barbara Herr Harthorn, 2000. "Toward Spatially Integrated Social Science," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 139-159, April.
    3. Ferhan Gezici & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2007. "Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 383-403, April.
    4. Luc Anselin, 2012. "From SpaceStat to CyberGIS," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(2), pages 131-157, April.
    5. Alex Braithwaite & QUAN LI, 2007. "Transnational Terrorism Hot Spots: Identification and Impact Evaluation," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(4), pages 281-296, September.
    6. repec:asg:wpaper:1012 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. M'HENNI, Hatem & METHAMEM, Raouchen, 2008. "Diffusion des TIC dans l’espace méditerranéen une explication géographique [ICT diffusion in the mediterranean space: a geographical explanation]," MPRA Paper 27550, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. S Wise & R Haining & P Signoretta, 1999. "Scientific Visualisation and the Exploratory Analysis of Area Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(10), pages 1825-1838, October.
    9. M H Matthews & A Airey & L Tacon & A Simpson, 1988. "The Influence of the Neighbourhood on Teacher Characteristics: A Case Study of Coventry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 20(5), pages 681-688, May.
    10. Ye, Xinyue & Yue, Wenze, 2014. "Comparative analysis of regional development: Exploratory space-time data analysis and open source implementation," Economics Discussion Papers 2014-20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Brigitte Waldorf, 2003. "Spatial Patterns and Processes in a Longitudinal Framework," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 269-288, July.
    12. repec:jss:jstsof:13:i06 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Rui Fragoso & Conceição Rego & Vladimir Bushenkov, 2016. "Clustering of Territorial Areas: A Multi-Criteria Districting Problem," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 14(2), pages 179-198, December.
    14. Montero Lorenzo, José María, 2004. "El precio medio del metro cuadrado de la vivienda libre: Una aproximación metodológica desde la perspectiva de la Geoestadística," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 22, pages 1-18, Diciembre.
    15. Chibuzor Christopher Nnanatu & Glory Atilola & Paul Komba & Lubanzadio Mavatikua & Zhuzhi Moore & Dennis Matanda & Otibho Obianwu & Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala, 2021. "Evaluating changes in the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among 0-14 years old girls in Nigeria using data from multiple surveys: A novel Bayesian hierarchical spatio-temporal model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-31, February.
    16. Heba, Ines & Malin, Eric & Thomas-Agnan, Christine, 2002. "Exploratory spatial data analysis with GEOXP," ERSA conference papers ersa02p498, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Mark D. Partridge & M. Rose Olfert, 2011. "The Winners' Choice: Sustainable Economic Strategies for Successful 21st-Century Regions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(2), pages 143-178.
    18. Liv Osland, 2010. "Spatial Variation in Job Accessibility and Gender: An Intraregional Analysis using Hedonic House-Price Estimation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2220-2237, September.
    19. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    20. repec:jss:jstsof:47:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Jianglong Chen & Jinlong Gao & Feng Yuan & Yehua Dennis Wei, 2016. "Spatial Determinants of Urban Land Expansion in Globalizing Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    22. Douven, W., 1992. "Urban and regional planning models and GIS," Serie Research Memoranda 0074, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    23. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    24. Davide BERLONI & Roberto ESPOSTI, 1999. "Scelte residenziali e mercati locali del lavoro. Il caso delle marche," Working Papers 126, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:30:y:1998:i:4:p:595-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.