IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i5p663-678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • Kinman, Edward L.

Abstract

Policy makers and health planners generally support the concept of equitable health care. A focus on who can use a health service, or its potential access, will not necessarily lead to equitable care if people are not willing to avail themselves of the health services offered. Because equity is difficult to operationalize, outcome-based indicators such as the actual utilization of services are advocated as a means to measure equal access. This paper evaluates the utility of linking the concept of equity with a temporal and spatial analysis of clinic users at a micro scale, supplemented by a community survey. Various spatial scales were employed in the analysis. Utilization of the primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia varied considerably during the first 25 months of operation. Spatially, utilization shifted away from the targeted service area. Within the targeted service area, usage was concentrated in a few blocks of the community and generally diminished with increasing distance from the clinic. The survey further revealed place of origin, length of residence, and language spoken at home as variables differentiating users from non-users. Failure to include the spatial dimension of utilization would lead to different conclusions if only aggregate data were employed. Spatial analysis of output measures is imperfect and does not necessarily deal with all of the access issues related to acceptability. They do, however, begin to isolate areas of a defined geographic area where further investigation would assist in ascertaining, and subsequently addressing, potential problems related to equal access.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinman, Edward L., 1999. "Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 663-678, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:5:p:663-678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00147-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandrina Lobo & Sónia Mateus, 2013. "Validity and Reliability of an Equity in Health Care Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, September.
    2. Holger Weckmüller & Carles Barriocanal & Roser Maneja & Martí Boada, 2019. "Factors Affecting Traditional Medicinal Plant Knowledge of the Waorani, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Yanhua Yuan & Jiangang Xu & Zhenbo Wang, 2017. "Spatial Equity Measure on Urban Ecological Space Layout Based on Accessibility of Socially Vulnerable Groups—A Case Study of Changting, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Yu Zhao & Guoqin Zhang & Tao Lin & Xiaofang Liu & Jiakun Liu & Meixia Lin & Hong Ye & Lingjie Kong, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Urban Communities: A Composite Spatial Accessibility Assessment for Residential Suitability Based on Network Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:5:p:663-678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.