IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15727-d984479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Anti-Erosion Efficiency of Forest Stands Installed on Degraded Land

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea Moldovan

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry (INCDS) “Marin Drăcea”, Cluj Branch, Street Horea, no. 65, 400202 Cluj Napoca, Romania)

  • Ioan Tăut

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry (INCDS) “Marin Drăcea”, Cluj Branch, Street Horea, no. 65, 400202 Cluj Napoca, Romania
    Department of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Street Calea Mănăștur, no. 3-5, 400372 Cluj Napoca, Romania)

  • Florin Alexandru Rebrean

    (Department of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Street Calea Mănăștur, no. 3-5, 400372 Cluj Napoca, Romania)

  • Bartha Szilard

    (Department of Forestry and Forest Engineering, University of Oradea, Gen. Magheru Street, no. 26, 410048 Oradea, Romania)

  • Iulia Diana Arion

    (Department of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Street Calea Mănăștur, no. 3-5, 400372 Cluj Napoca, Romania)

  • Marcel Dîrja

    (Department of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Street Calea Mănăștur, no. 3-5, 400372 Cluj Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Erosion caused by human activities is one of the reasons for forest soil degradation worldwide, with a direct impact on forest stands development, including reduced forest productivity. Therefore, in order to establish sustainable stand management practices, it is essential to assess soil losses in various forestry activities. Moreover, this phenomenon is studied little in stands, especially those established on degraded land. In Romanian geographical conditions, where sloping land is up to 67% of the territory and is influenced by natural factors as well as intense human activities, the soil and vegetation suffer serious ecological imbalances. In order to achieve the proposed objectives regarding the evaluation of stands in terms of anti-erosion effectiveness, we analyzed the consistency and the number of trees on the surface, the weight of the seedlings, and the surface runoff from the perspectives of rainfall and soil retention. In the two stands included in this study, the influence of rain intensity was 39% in compartment 49 and 38% in compartment 73, directly influencing surface runoff. The ground retention’s influence on surface runoff was 28% in both compartments. The indirect surface runoff was influenced by the consistency of the stands and by the degree of proximity of the crowns, which directly influenced the intensity of rain. In addition to analyzing these two parameters (rain intensity and ground retention), it was also observed that the degree of proximity to the crowns directly influenced the intensity of the rainfall within the forest, which, in turn, indirectly affected the runoff.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea Moldovan & Ioan Tăut & Florin Alexandru Rebrean & Bartha Szilard & Iulia Diana Arion & Marcel Dîrja, 2022. "Determining the Anti-Erosion Efficiency of Forest Stands Installed on Degraded Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15727-:d:984479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masiero, Mauro & Secco, Laura & Pettenella, Davide & Brotto, Lucio, 2015. "Standards and guidelines for forest plantation management: A global comparative study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 29-44.
    2. David Pimentel & Michael Burgess, 2013. "Soil Erosion Threatens Food Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Luo & Peng Yang & Xiangjun Pei & Junhao Li & Shihan Shan & Yuying Duan & Yingping Huang, 2023. "Impact of Rock Fragment Shapes and Soil Cohesion on Runoff Generation and Sediment Yield of Steep Cut Slopes under Heavy Rainfall Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Folasade Mary OWOADE, 2021. "Effects of Land Use Types on Soil Productivity Parameters: A Case Study of Ogbomoso Agricultural Zone, Southern Guinea Savanna Ecology of Nigeria," Noble International Journal of Scientific Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 5(4), pages 29-40, December.
    2. Carina Mueller & Christopher West & Mairon G. Bastos Lima & Bob Doherty, 2023. "Demand-Side Actors in Agricultural Supply Chain Sustainability: An Assessment of Motivations for Action, Implementation Challenges, and Research Frontiers," World, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Md. Yamin Kabir & Nasrin Sultana & Md. Abdul Mannan, 2022. "Evaluation Of Nutrient Content Of Composts Made From Water Hyacinth, Kitchen Waste And Manures," Journal of Wastes and Biomass Management (JWBM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 96-101, October.
    4. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    5. Katrin Martens & Sebastian Rogga & Jana Zscheischler & Bernd Pölling & Andreas Obersteg & Annette Piorr, 2022. "Classifying New Hybrid Cooperation Models for Short Food-Supply Chains—Providing a Concept for Assessing Sustainability Transformation in the Urban-Rural Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Natanael Bolson & Tadeusz Patzek, 2022. "Evaluation of Rwanda’s Energy Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Samaneh Bahrololoum & Mojtaba Mahmood Molaei Kermani & Farzaneh Koohzadi, 2022. "Ecopreneurs and agricultural waste management," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 47-51, December.
    8. Koiry, Subrata & Huang, Wei, 2023. "Do ecological protection approaches affect total factor productivity change of cropland production in Sweden?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Daniel Aviles & Ingrid Wesström & Abraham Joel, 2020. "Effect of Vegetation Removal on Soil Erosion and Bank Stability in Agricultural Drainage Ditches," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Khalid Hussain & Ayesha Ilyas & Irshad Bibi & Thomas Hilger, 2021. "Sustainable Soil Loss Management in Tropical Uplands: Impact on Maize-Chili Cropping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Rachit Saxena & Sai Kranthi Vanga & Jin Wang & Valérie Orsat & Vijaya Raghavan, 2018. "Millets for Food Security in the Context of Climate Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-31, June.
    13. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Muhammad Ihtisham & Muhammad Khayyam & Sohaib Ismail, 2021. "Current Progress and Future Prospects of Agriculture Technology: Gateway to Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-31, April.
    14. Manuel González-Rosado & Luis Parras-Alcántara & Jesús Aguilera-Huertas & Beatriz Lozano-García, 2022. "No-Tillage Does Not Always Stop the Soil Degradation in Relation to Aggregation and Soil Carbon Storage in Mediterranean Olive Orchards," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Katherine del Carmen Camacho-Zorogastúa & Julio Cesar Minga & Jhon Walter Gómez-Lora & Víctor Hugo Gallo-Ramos & Victor Garcés Díaz, 2023. "Evaluation of Soil Loss and Sediment Yield Based on GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques in a Complex Amazon Mountain Basin of Peru: Case Study Mayo River Basin, San Martin Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Ziauddin Safari & Sayed Tamim Rahimi & Kamal Ahmed & Ahmad Sharafati & Ghaith Falah Ziarh & Shamsuddin Shahid & Tarmizi Ismail & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Eun-Sung Chung & Xiaojun Wang, 2021. "Estimation of Spatial and Seasonal Variability of Soil Erosion in a Cold Arid River Basin in Hindu Kush Mountainous Region Using Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Shangyi Lou & Jin He & Hongwen Li & Qingjie Wang & Caiyun Lu & Wenzheng Liu & Peng Liu & Zhenguo Zhang & Hui Li, 2021. "Current Knowledge and Future Directions for Improving Subsoiling Quality and Reducing Energy Consumption in Conservation Fields," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Jinzhong Xu & Hao Li & XiaoBing Liu & Wei Hu & Qingnan Yang & Yanfang Hao & Huaicai Zhen & Xingyi Zhang, 2019. "Gully Erosion Induced by Snowmelt in Northeast China: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Félicien Majoro & Umaru Garba Wali & Omar Munyaneza & François-Xavier Naramabuye, 2023. "Sustainability Analysis of Soil Erosion Control in Rwanda: Case Study of the Sebeya Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Rubaiya Binte Mostafiz & Ryozo Noguchi & Tofael Ahamed, 2021. "Agricultural Land Suitability Assessment Using Satellite Remote Sensing-Derived Soil-Vegetation Indices," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15727-:d:984479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.