IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10391-d893872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoiding Food Neophobia and Increasing Consumer Acceptance of New Food Trends—A Decade of Research

Author

Listed:
  • Shahida Anusha Siddiqui

    (Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University of Munich, Essigberg 3, 94315 Straubing, Germany
    German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Oscar Zannou

    (Department of Food Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun 55139, Turkey)

  • Ikawati Karim

    (Agribusiness Department, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene 91412, Indonesia)

  • Kasmiati

    (Agribusiness Department, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene 91412, Indonesia)

  • Nour M. H. Awad

    (Department of Food Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun 55139, Turkey)

  • Janusz Gołaszewski

    (Center for Bioeconomy and Renewable Energies, Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Volker Heinz

    (German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Sergiy Smetana

    (German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

Abstract

The increasingly fierce competition in food trends requires producers to innovate and develop new foods to be accepted and to avoid neophobia by consumers at the same time. Food neophobia’s motivational adoption barriers include the consumption of novel foods, social norms and conflicting eating goals. Therefore, appropriate strategies are needed to avoid neophobia amid the presence of new food trends in the market. Efforts to avoid food neophobia can also be accepted as part of the sustainability concept, in which the consumer has new foods to choose from in order to reduce scarcity in one particular type of food. The food industry is also challenged to produce healthy food by producing food from natural ingredients. In this article, new food trends and advances in food processing are described, and through them, strategies to avoid neophobia and increase consumer acceptance of new food trends are referenced. Neophobia meets marketing food products delivered to consumers facing motivational adoption barriers, such as the consumption of novel foods, social norms and conflicting eating goals, which are indicated to be challenges to purchase drivers in new food trends. Tasting foods is indicated as one of the most efficient means to ensure neophobia reduction in new foods and new food trends. Other factors identified to reduce food neophobia are education, income, taste and exposure to novel foods. Some preconditions for novel foods to be accepted by consumers are related to the very nature of food innovation, the manufacturer’s features and market circumstances. Food processed with advanced technologies may differ depending on the brand of the food production company and the knowledge of consumers about the novel foods. Moreover, food technology is seen as more acceptable for plant food products based or natural ingredients for consumers. In addition to the focus on health benefits, it is supports the sustainability of food systems. Another accidental element is the transparent traceability system providing accurate and adequate information about such novel foods.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Oscar Zannou & Ikawati Karim & Kasmiati & Nour M. H. Awad & Janusz Gołaszewski & Volker Heinz & Sergiy Smetana, 2022. "Avoiding Food Neophobia and Increasing Consumer Acceptance of New Food Trends—A Decade of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10391-:d:893872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominika Guzek & Duy Nguyen & Dominika Głąbska, 2021. "Food Neophobia and Consumer Choices within Vietnamese Menu in a Polish Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Macready, Anna L. & Hieke, Sophie & Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena & Szumiał, Szymon & Vranken, Liesbet & Grunert, Klaus G., 2020. "Consumer trust in the food value chain and its impact on consumer confidence: A model for assessing consumer trust and evidence from a 5-country study in Europe," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Camarena-Gomez, Dena M. & Sanjuan, Ana Isabel, 2009. "The influence of psychographic variables on consumer preferences. The case of ethnic food in Spain," 113th Seminar, September 3-6, 2009, Chania, Crete, Greece 57991, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wioletta Biel & Cezary Podsiadło & Robert Witkowicz & Jagoda Kępińska-Pacelik & Sławomir Stankowski, 2023. "Effect of Irrigation, Nitrogen Fertilization and Amino Acid Biostimulant on Proximate Composition and Energy Value of Pisum sativum L. Seeds," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Eulalia Skawińska & Romuald I. Zalewski, 2023. "New Foods as a Factor in Enhancing Energy Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Zhixu Liu, 2024. "Unlocking Consumer Choices in the Digital Economy: Exploring Factors Influencing Online and Offline Purchases in the Emerging Pet Food Market," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 10174-10199, September.
    4. Yuyun Puji Rahayu & Albertus Girik Allo & Umi Yuminarti & Elina R. Situmorang, 2023. "Is sago the best substitution for rice? An analysis of demand for rice in Papua," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Ana Težak Damijanić & Ana Čehić Marić & Milan Oplanić, 2024. "Psychological Factors Influencing Willingness to Purchase Wild–Edible Plants and Food Products from Wild–Edible Plants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Joseph Seong & Simone Valle de Souza & H. Christopher Peterson, 2023. "Seeds of Industry Sustainability: Consumer Attitudes towards Indoor Agriculture Benefits versus Its Advanced Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Prachi Singh & Sipper Khan & Ito Fernando & Igor Spartakovich Baklanov & Tigran Garrievich Ambartsumov & Salam A. Ibrahim, 2022. "Cultural, Social and Psychological Factors of the Conservative Consumer towards Legal Cannabis Use—A Review since 2013," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Eulalia Skawińska & Romuald I. Zalewski & Joanna Wyrwa, 2023. "Students’ Food Consumption Behavior during COVID-19 Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-28, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friederike Paetz, 2016. "Persönlichkeitsmerkmale als Segmentierungsvariablen: Eine empirische Studie [Personality traits for market segmentation: An empirical study]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 279-306, August.
    2. De Devitiis, Biagia & Viscecchia, Rosaria & Carfora, Valentina & Cavallo, Carla & Cicia, Gianna & Del Giudice, Teresa & Menna, Concetta & Nardone, Gianluca & Secca, Antonio, 2021. "Parents’ trust in food safety and healthiness of children’s diets: A TPB model explaining the role of retailers and government," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 23(2), July.
    3. Jae-Jang Yang & Rajesh Iyer & Yong-Ki Lee, 2022. "Why Do Local Foodscapes Matter in Building Tourist Trust and Loyalty?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Cyrielle Gaglio & Simone Pfuderer & Bodo Steiner, 2024. "Sustainability initiatives in food supply chains from stakeholders' perspectives: An analysis of predictors of cognition-based trust and trust initiatives," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2024 24, Stata Users Group.
    5. Tanja Dergan & Aneta Ivanovska & Tina Kocjančič & Pietro P. M. Iannetta & Marko Debeljak, 2022. "‘Multi-SWOT’ Multi-Stakeholder-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology: Applied to Improve Slovenian Legume-Based Agri-Food Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Allison Loconto & Francisco Garrido-Garza, 2021. "Formal and informal European quality assurance initiatives offering a connection between local gastronomy and small-scale farmers," Working Papers hal-03173144, HAL.
    7. Dimitris Skalkos & Ioanna S. Kosma & Areti Vasiliou & Raquel P. F. Guine, 2021. "Consumers’ Trust in Greek Traditional Foods in the Post COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & West, Douglas C., 2021. "Supply chain transparency: A bibliometric review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    9. Ladwein, Richard & Sánchez Romero, Andrea Milena, 2021. "The role of trust in the relationship between consumers, producers and retailers of organic food: A sector-based approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Caterina Contini & Fabio Boncinelli & Giovanna Piracci & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Can blockchain technology strengthen consumer preferences for credence attributes?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. David Kühn & Adriano Profeta & Thomas Krikser & Volker Heinz, 2023. "Adaption of the meat attachment scale (MEAS) to Germany: interplay with food neophobia, preference for organic foods, social trust and trust in food technology innovations," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Schulze, Christoph & Matzdorf, Bettina & Rommel, Jens & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & García-Llorente, Marina & Gutiérrez-Briceño, Inés & Larsson, Lina & Zagórska, Katarzyna & Zawadzki, Wojciech, 2024. "Between farms and forks: Food industry perspectives on the future of EU food labelling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Siddiqui, Mujahid & Chakraborty, Debarun & Siddiqui, Aaliyah, 2023. "Consumers buying behaviour towards agri-food products: A mixed-method approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Felix Zoll & Caitlin K. Kirby & Kathrin Specht & Rosemarie Siebert, 2023. "Exploring member trust in German community-supported agriculture: a multiple regression analysis," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 709-724, June.
    15. Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Ajay Jha & Massimo Gastaldi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 179-197, December.
    16. Xin Lin & Shu-Chen Chang & Tung-Hsiang Chou & Shih-Chih Chen & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2021. "Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Blockchain Food Traceability Technology towards Organic Food Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Gaëlle Petit & Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris & Claudia Eckert & Yan Liu, 2021. "Facilitating Aligned Co-Decisions for More Sustainable Food Value Chains," Post-Print hal-03640243, HAL.
    18. Yutong Liu & Jian Du & Taewon Kang & Mingu Kang, 2024. "Establishing supply chain transparency and its impact on supply chain risk management and resilience," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1157-1171, September.
    19. Oluwagbenga Akinwehinmi & Kolawole Ogundari & Taye Timothy Amos, 2022. "Consumers’ food control risk perception and preference for food safety certification in emerging food markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 690-708, September.
    20. Dong, Xuemei & Jiang, Baichen & Zeng, Hui & Kassoh, Fallah Samuel, 2022. "Impact of trust and knowledge in the food chain on motivation-behavior gap in green consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10391-:d:893872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.