IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p973-d482891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Issues of a Hammer Mill Working Process Using Statistical Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Gigel Paraschiv

    (Department of Biotechnical Systems, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Georgiana Moiceanu

    (Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Gheorghe Voicu

    (Department of Biotechnical Systems, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Chitoiu

    (Department of Biotechnical Systems, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Petru Cardei

    (The National Institute of Research—Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry—INMA Bucharest, 013813 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mirela Nicoleta Dinca

    (Department of Biotechnical Systems, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Paula Tudor

    (Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Our paper presents the hammer mill working process optimization problem destined for milling energetic biomass ( Miscanthus Giganteus and Salix Viminalis ). For the study, functional and constructive parameters of the hammer mill were taken into consideration in order to reduce the specific energy consumption. The energy consumption dependency on the mill rotor spinning frequency and on the sieve orifices in use, as well as on the material feeding flow, in correlation with the vegetal biomass milling degree was the focus of the analysis. For obtaining this the hammer mill was successively equipped with 4 different types of hammers that grind the energetic biomass, which had a certain humidity content and an initial degree of reduction ratio of the material. In order to start the optimization process of hammer mill working process, 12 parameters were defined. The objective functions which minimize hammer mill energy consumption and maximize the milled material percentage with a certain specific granulation were established. The results obtained can serve as the basis for choosing the optimal working, constructive, and functional parameters of hammer mills in this field, and for a better design of future hammer mills.

Suggested Citation

  • Gigel Paraschiv & Georgiana Moiceanu & Gheorghe Voicu & Mihai Chitoiu & Petru Cardei & Mirela Nicoleta Dinca & Paula Tudor, 2021. "Optimization Issues of a Hammer Mill Working Process Using Statistical Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:973-:d:482891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/973/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/973/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Orla & Newbolt, Gary & Eastwick, Carol & Kingman, Sam & Giddings, Donald & Lormor, Stephen & Lester, Edward, 2016. "Influence of mill type on densified biomass comminution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 219-231.
    2. Kumari, Dolly & Singh, Radhika, 2018. "Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 877-891.
    3. Jacopo Bacenetti, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy from Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-5, July.
    4. Martin J. Taylor & Hassan A. Alabdrabalameer & Vasiliki Skoulou, 2019. "Choosing Physical, Physicochemical and Chemical Methods of Pre-Treating Lignocellulosic Wastes to Repurpose into Solid Fuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Zawiślak, Kazimierz & Sobczak, Paweł & Kraszkiewicz, Artur & Niedziółka, Ignacy & Parafiniuk, Stanisław & Kuna-Broniowska, Izabela & Tanaś, Wojciech & Żukiewicz-Sobczak, Wioletta & Obidziński, Sławomi, 2020. "The use of lignocellulosic waste in the production of pellets for energy purposes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 997-1003.
    6. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, 2020. "A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weronika Kruszelnicka & Jakub Hlosta & Jan Diviš & Łukasz Gierz, 2021. "Study of the Relationships between Multi-Hole, Multi-Disc Mill Performance Parameters and Comminution Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Jewiarz & Marek Wróbel & Krzysztof Mudryk & Szymon Szufa, 2020. "Impact of the Drying Temperature and Grinding Technique on Biomass Grindability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Gerrit Ralf Surup & Hamideh Kaffash & Yan Ma & Anna Trubetskaya & Johan Berg Pettersen & Merete Tangstad, 2022. "Life Cycle Based Climate Emissions of Charcoal Conditioning Routes for the Use in the Ferro-Alloy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Shuren Chen & Yunfei Zhao & Zhong Tang & Hantao Ding & Zhan Su & Zhao Ding, 2022. "Structural Model of Straw Briquetting Machine with Vertical Ring Die and Optimization of Briquetting Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Anita Konieczna & Kamila Mazur & Adam Koniuszy & Andrzej Gawlik & Igor Sikorski, 2022. "Thermal Energy and Exhaust Emissions of a Gasifier Stove Feeding Pine and Hemp Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Hívila M. P. Marreiro & Rogério S. Peruchi & Riuzuani M. B. P. Lopes & Silvia L. F. Andersen & Sayonara A. Eliziário & Paulo Rotella Junior, 2021. "Empirical Studies on Biomass Briquette Production: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-40, December.
    6. Xing, Zhou & Ping, Zhou & Xiqiang, Zhao & Zhanlong, Song & Wenlong, Wang & Jing, Sun & Yanpeng, Mao, 2021. "Applicability of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) system integrated with pre-drying or torrefaction for flue gas waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Liu, Yichen & Wang, Yue & Fu, Xing & Li, Qiuxing & Wang, Wenli & Hu, Changwei, 2021. "Effect of MgCl2 solution pretreatment on pubescens conversion at room temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 287-298.
    8. Ebrahimian, Farinaz & Karimi, Keikhosro & Angelidaki, Irini, 2022. "Coproduction of hydrogen, butanol, butanediol, ethanol, and biogas from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste using bacterial cocultivation followed by anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 552-560.
    9. Naidoo, Joab C. & Moodley, Preshanthan & Sanusi, Isaac A. & Sewsynker-Sukai, Y. & Meyer, Edson L. & Gueguim Kana, Evariste, 2024. "Microwave-assisted sequential green liquor-inorganic salt pretreatment for enhanced sugar recovery from sorghum leaves towards bioethanol and biohydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. I. Vaskalis & V. Skoulou & G. Stavropoulos & A. Zabaniotou, 2019. "Towards Circular Economy Solutions for The Management of Rice Processing Residues to Bioenergy via Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Lacrimioara Senila & Ioan Tenu & Petru Carlescu & Daniela Alexandra Scurtu & Eniko Kovacs & Marin Senila & Oana Cadar & Marius Roman & Diana Elena Dumitras & Cecilia Roman, 2022. "Characterization of Biobriquettes Produced from Vineyard Wastes as a Solid Biofuel Resource," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Henrique Piqueiro & Reinaldo Gomes & Romão Santos & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Martin J. Taylor & Apostolos K. Michopoulos & Anastasia A. Zabaniotou & Vasiliki Skoulou, 2020. "Probing Synergies between Lignin-Rich and Cellulose Compounds for Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-9, May.
    14. Grzegorz Maj & Paweł Krzaczek & Wojciech Gołębiowski & Tomasz Słowik & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Grzegorz Zając, 2022. "Energy Consumption and Quality of Pellets Made of Waste from Corn Grain Drying Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Merve Nazli Borand & Asli Isler Kaya & Filiz Karaosmanoglu, 2020. "Saccharification Yield through Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Steam-Exploded Pinewood," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Yanmei Liu & Astley Hastings & Shaolin Chen & André Faaij, 2023. "A Spatially Explicit Evaluation of the Economic Performance of a Perennial Energy Crop on the Marginal Land of the Loess Plateau and China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-27, July.
    17. Rosa Martins & Haylemar de Nazaret Cardenas-Rodriguez & Levy Ely Lacerda Oliveira & Erik Leandro Bonaldi & Frederico de Oliveira Assuncao & Germano Lambert-Torres & Helcio Francisco Villa-Nova & Wilso, 2022. "Technical and Economic Analysis of the Implementation of a Self-Sustainable Briquetting Process for Electric Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Wentao Li & Mingfeng Wang & Fanbin Meng & Yifei Zhang & Bo Zhang, 2022. "A Review on the Effects of Pretreatment and Process Parameters on Properties of Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Anu, & Kumar, Anil & Rapoport, Alexander & Kunze, Gotthard & Kumar, Sanjeev & Singh, Davender & Singh, Bijender, 2020. "Multifarious pretreatment strategies for the lignocellulosic substrates for the generation of renewable and sustainable biofuels: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1228-1252.
    20. Pinto, T. & Flores-Alsina, X. & Gernaey, K.V. & Junicke, H., 2021. "Alone or together? A review on pure and mixed microbial cultures for butanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:973-:d:482891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.