IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7650-d1140888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Piqueiro

    (INESC TEC—Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Reinaldo Gomes

    (INESC TEC—Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Romão Santos

    (INESC TEC—Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Jorge Pinho de Sousa

    (INESC TEC—Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

To design and deploy their supply chains, companies must naturally take quite different decisions, some being strategic or tactical, and others of an operational nature. This work resulted in a decision support system for optimising a biomass supply chain in Portugal, allowing a more efficient operations management, and enhancing the design process. Uncertainty and variability in the biomass supply chain is a critical issue that needs to be considered in the production planning of bioenergy plants. A simulation/optimisation framework was developed to support decision-making, by combining plans generated by a resource allocation optimisation model with the simulation of disruptive wildfire scenarios in the forest biomass supply chain. Different scenarios have been generated to address uncertainty and variability in the quantity and quality of raw materials in the different supply nodes. Computational results show that this simulation/optimisation approach can have a significant impact in the operations efficiency, particularly when disruptions occur closer to the end of the planning horizon. The approach seems to be easily scalable and easy to extend to other sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Piqueiro & Reinaldo Gomes & Romão Santos & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7650-:d:1140888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2015. "A generic mathematical model to optimise strategic and tactical decisions in biomass-based supply chains (OPTIMASS)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 247-264.
    2. Nunes, L.J.R. & Causer, T.P. & Ciolkosz, D., 2020. "Biomass for energy: A review on supply chain management models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Rentizelas, Athanasios A. & Tolis, Athanasios J. & Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P., 2009. "Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 887-894, May.
    4. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov, 2019. "The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 829-846, February.
    5. Fangzhou Sun & Maichel M. Aguayo & Rahul Ramachandran & Subhash C. Sarin, 2018. "Biomass feedstock supply chain design – a taxonomic review and a decomposition-based methodology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5626-5659, September.
    6. Xiaorui Liu & Haiping Yang & Jiamin Yang & Fang Liu, 2022. "Application of Random Forest Model Integrated with Feature Reduction for Biomass Torrefaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan, 2018. "A multi-stage stochastic program for the sustainable design of biofuel supply chain networks under biomass supply uncertainty and disruption risk: A real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 534-567.
    8. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2020. "Hybrid optimization-simulation for integrated planning of bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh & Griess, Verena C., 2018. "Integrated strategic and tactical optimization of forest-based biomass supply chains to consider medium-term supply and demand variations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 626-638.
    11. Bouchard, M. & D’Amours, S. & Rönnqvist, M. & Azouzi, R. & Gunn, E., 2017. "Integrated optimization of strategic and tactical planning decisions in forestry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1132-1143.
    12. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, 2020. "A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    13. Zhang, Fengli & Johnson, Dana & Johnson, Mark & Watkins, David & Froese, Robert & Wang, Jinjiang, 2016. "Decision support system integrating GIS with simulation and optimisation for a biofuel supply chain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 740-748.
    14. Nasim Zandi Atashbar & Nacima Labadie & Christian Prins, 2018. "Modelling and optimisation of biomass supply chains: a review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3482-3506, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahmani, Pardis & Dehghani Sadrabadi, Mohammad Hossein & Makui, Ahmad & Jafari-Nodoushan, Abbasali, 2024. "An optimization-based design methodology to manage the sustainable biomass-to-biodiesel supply chain under disruptions: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Jian-Xin & Tan, Xianchun & Gu, Baihe & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2022. "Integration of supply chain management of hybrid biomass power plant with carbon capture and storage operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1055-1065.
    2. Farajiamiri, Mina & Meyer, Jörn-Christian & Walther, Grit, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of renewable fuel supply chains regarding cost, land use, and water use," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    3. Hong, Jae-Dong & Mwakalonge, Judith L., 2020. "Biofuel logistics network scheme design with combined data envelopment analysis approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Bernardine Chigozie Chidozie & Ana Luísa Ramos & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2023. "Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Martinez-Valencia, Lina & Garcia-Perez, Manuel & Wolcott, Michael P., 2021. "Supply chain configuration of sustainable aviation fuel: Review, challenges, and pathways for including environmental and social benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Li, Zhengbing & Liang, Yongtu & Ni, Weilong & Liao, Qi & Xu, Ning & Li, Lichao & Zheng, Jianqin & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Pipesharing: economic-environmental benefits from transporting biofuels through multiproduct pipelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Zarei, Mohammadamin & Shams, Mohammad H. & Niaz, Haider & Won, Wangyun & Lee, Chul-Jin & Liu, J. Jay, 2022. "Risk-based multistage stochastic mixed-integer optimization for biofuel supply chain management under multiple uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 694-705.
    8. Liu, Wan-Yu & Lin, Chun-Cheng & Yeh, Tzu-Lei, 2017. "Supply chain optimization of forest biomass electricity and bioethanol coproduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 630-645.
    9. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    10. Wolff, Michael & Becker, Tristan & Walther, Grit, 2023. "Long-term design and analysis of renewable fuel supply chains – An integrated approach considering seasonal resource availability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 745-762.
    11. Luo, Li & O'Hehir, Jim & Regan, Courtney M. & Meng, Li & Connor, Jeffery D. & Chow, Christopher W.K., 2021. "An integrated strategic and tactical optimization model for forest supply chain planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A review and future directions in techno-economic modeling and optimization of upstream forest biomass to bio-oil supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 15-35.
    13. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Razm, Sobhan & Brahimi, Nadjib & Hammami, Ramzi & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2023. "A production planning model for biorefineries with biomass perishability and biofuel transformation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    15. Md Abu Helal & Nathaniel Anderson & Yu Wei & Matthew Thompson, 2023. "A Review of Biomass-to-Bioenergy Supply Chain Research Using Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-32, January.
    16. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Vitale, Ignacio & Dondo, Rodolfo G. & González, Matías & Cóccola, Mariana E., 2022. "Modelling and optimization of material flows in the wood pellet supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    18. Ghadge, Abhijeet & van der Werf, Sjoerd & Er Kara, Merve & Goswami, Mohit & Kumar, Pankaj & Bourlakis, Michael, 2020. "Modelling the impact of climate change risk on bioethanol supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Yunusoglu, Pinar & Ozsoydan, Fehmi Burcin & Bilgen, Bilge, 2024. "A machine learning-based two-stage approach for the location of undesirable facilities in the biomass-to-bioenergy supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7650-:d:1140888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.