IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p961-d482745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Geographical Indications (GI) to Enhance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Japan: Overview and Insights from Japan GI Mishima Potato

Author

Listed:
  • Junko Kimura

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Hosei University, Tokyo 1028160, Japan)

  • Cyrille Rigolot

    (UMR Territoires, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, AgroParisTech, Route de Theix, F63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France)

Abstract

Geographical indications (GIs) have recently become an important tool for Japanese agricultural policy, particularly after the adoption of a “sui generis” certification system in 2015. In the same year, the United Nations proposed a common agenda with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The present paper addresses the potential of GIs to enhance SDGs in Japan. First, we examine existing knowledge on GI inception, which consists in both government reports and research surveys. We show that these studies mostly focus on SDGs related to economic growth, and on social issues raised by the registration process. Then, as an exploration of potential impacts of GIs on the full set of SDGs, we study the case of Mishima Bareisho Potato GI, on the basis of interviews and participatory observation. From local stakeholders’ point of view, Mishima Potato GI can contribute to at least nine SDGs at all the production, transformation and commercialization stages. The SDG framework is useful to reveal some contributions seldomly considered in GI studies but which matter for local people, for example, the employment of disabled people or nutritional education. Finally, we discuss how these new insights can contribute to the debate on the potential role and limits of GIs for sustainable development in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Junko Kimura & Cyrille Rigolot, 2021. "The Potential of Geographical Indications (GI) to Enhance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Japan: Overview and Insights from Japan GI Mishima Potato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:961-:d:482745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrice Cayre & Audrey Michaud & Jean-Pierre Theau & Cyrille Rigolot, 2018. "The Coexistence of Multiple Worldviews in Livestock Farming Drives Agroecological Transition. A Case Study in French Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) Cheese Mountain Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Barjolle, Dominique & Philippe, Jeanneaux, 2012. "Raising Rivals’ Costs Strategy and Localised Agro-Food Systems in Europe," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Luke Owen & Donna Udall & Alex Franklin & Moya Kneafsey, 2020. "Place-Based Pathways to Sustainability: Exploring Alignment between Geographical Indications and the Concept of Agroecology Territories in Wales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Andrea Marescotti & Xiomara F. Quiñones-Ruiz & Hanna Edelmann & Giovanni Belletti & Kristina Broscha & Christine Altenbuchner & Marianne Penker & Silvia Scaramuzzi, 2020. "Are Protected Geographical Indications Evolving Due to Environmentally Related Justifications? An Analysis of Amendments in the Fruit and Vegetable Sector in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Pierre Gasselin & Nathalie Hostiou, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 173-190, December.
    6. Marie-Vivien, Delphine & Biénabe, Estelle, 2017. "The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Louis Augustin-Jean & Kae Sekine, 2012. "From Products of Origin to Geographical Indications in Japan: Perspectives on the Construction of Quality for the Emblematic Productions of Kobe and Matsusaka Beef," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Louis Augustin-Jean & Hélène Ilbert & Neantro Saavedra-Rivano (ed.), Geographical Indications and International Agricultural Trade, chapter 7, pages 139-163, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Pierre Gasselin & Nathalie Hostiou, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 173-190.
    9. Kazumi Kondoh, 2015. "The alternative food movement in Japan: Challenges, limits, and resilience of the teikei system," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(1), pages 143-153, March.
    10. Morgane Millet & Valerie Keast & Stefano Gonano & François Casabianca, 2020. "Product Qualification as a Means of Identifying Sustainability Pathways for Place-Based Agri-Food Systems: The Case of the GI Corsican Grapefruit (France)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Gangjee, Dev S., 2017. "Proving Provenance? Geographical Indications Certification and its Ambiguities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 12-24.
    12. Gasselin, Pierre & Hostiou, Nathalie, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huysmans, Martijn, 2021. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU Geographical Indications Down Under," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314978, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU geographical indications in Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 598-613, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Bernard-Mongin & Jimmy Balouzat & Elise Chau & Alice Garnier & Stéphanie Lequin & François Lerin & Ahmet Veliji, 2021. "Geographical Indication Building Process for Sharr Cheese (Kosovo): “Inside Insights” on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Ronan Velly & Annemarie Mol & Philip McMichael, 2021. "Book review symposium: Hugh Campbell: farming inside invisible worlds—modernist agriculture and its consequences," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 425-433, December.
    3. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Morgane Millet & Valerie Keast & Stefano Gonano & François Casabianca, 2020. "Product Qualification as a Means of Identifying Sustainability Pathways for Place-Based Agri-Food Systems: The Case of the GI Corsican Grapefruit (France)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Guillaume Ollivier & Pierre Gasselin & Véronique Batifol, 2024. "The framings of the coexistence of agrifood models: a computational analysis of French media," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1103-1127, September.
    6. Marcelo Sili & María Isabel Haag & María Belén Nieto, 2022. "Constructing the Transitions and Co-Existence of Rural Development Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Camille Hochedez & Émilie Lanciano & Julien Noel & Séverine Saleilles, 2022. "Transition to the test of food justice : construction of a repertoire of practices in 5 initiatives in Angers, Lyon and Poitiers [La transition à l'épreuve de la justice alimentaire : construction ," Post-Print halshs-03930423, HAL.
    8. Pagliacci, Francesco & Salpina, Dana, 2024. "Adapting to climate change: what really drives the choices of the producers of Geographical Indications?," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 13(3), October.
    9. Morgane Millet & François Casabianca, 2019. "Sharing Values for Changing Practices, a Lever for Sustainable Transformation? The Case of Farmers and Processors in Interaction within Localized Cheese Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Emilie Vandecandelaere & Luis Fernando Samper & Andrés Rey & Ana Daza & Pablo Mejía & Florence Tartanac & Massimo Vittori, 2021. "The Geographical Indication Pathway to Sustainability: A Framework to Assess and Monitor the Contributions of Geographical Indications to Sustainability through a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong, 2023. "Comparative study on the geographical indication protection between China and the European Union - From the perspective of the China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(5), pages 185-201.
    12. Martijn Huysmans & D. van Noord, 2021. "The market for lemons from Sorrento and Gouda from Holland. Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?: Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?," Working Papers 2108, Utrecht School of Economics.
    13. Faustine Ruggieri & Cécile Coulon-Leroy & Armelle Mazé, 2023. "How Can Collective Action Support the Agroecological Transition in Geographical Indication Vineyards? Insights from the Loire Valley Wine Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. N. Lalitha & Madhusudan Bandi & Soumya Vinayan, 2021. "Bhalia wheat in Gujarat: Does geographical indication registration have a role in arresting the decline?," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(1), pages 93-112, June.
    16. Monier-Dilhan Sylvette & Poméon Thomas & Böhm Michael & Brečić Ruzica & Csillag Peter & Donati Michele & Ferrer-Pérez Hugo & Gauvrit Lisa & Gil José M. & Hoàng Việt & Lilavanichakul Apichaya & Majewsk, 2021. "Do Food Quality Schemes and Net Price Premiums Go Together?," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 79-94, December.
    17. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Kae Sekine, 2021. "The Potential and Contradictions of Geographical Indication and Patrimonization for the Sustainability of Indigenous Communities: A Case of Cordillera Heirloom Rice in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Loïc Henry, 2023. "Adapting the designated area of geographical indications to climate change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1088-1115, August.
    20. Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong & Yuchen Liu, 2023. "The impact of mutual recognition of geographical indications on the quality upgrading of China’s agricultural exports," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:961-:d:482745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.