IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rae/jouraf/v101y2020i2-3p173-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Gasselin

    (Innovation, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
    INRAE – UMR Innovation, 2, place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier, France
    Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan)

  • Nathalie Hostiou

    (Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, AgroParisTech, VetAgro Sup, UMR Territoires, F-63170 Aubière, France
    INRAE – UMR Territoires / VetAgro Sup - Campus Agronomique de Clermont, 89 Avenue de l’Europe, BP35, F-63370 Lempdes, France)

Abstract

The coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models are an issue that is evincing much interest from the media and the political and professional fields. It is also an active area of research, a fact which led to a call for articles and the publication of a special issue. This article introduces and analyzes the 9 articles selected and published in 2020, and characterizes the diversity of the associated research (issues, fields, disciplines). After shedding light on the polysemy involved, as well as the fundamentals of the concept of agricultural and food model mobilized by the authors, we examine how they consider situations of coexistence. We identify three epistemological postures that reflect the contrasting positions of the authors vis-à-vis knowledge, actors, and action: functionalist coexistence, coexistence based on power relations, and coexistence in a transition perspective. These studies encourage the development of new research perspectives, in particular in order to make progress in the theorization of the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Gasselin & Nathalie Hostiou, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 173-190.
    • Handle: RePEc:rae:jouraf:v:101:y:2020:i:2-3:p:173-190
    DOI: 10.1007/s41130-020-00130-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-020-00130-y
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41130-020-00130-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clémentine Rémy & Hubert Cochet, 2020. "“Win-win” agricultural investment projects put to the test: the case of the IDSP project as promoted by the World Bank in Zambia," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 363-389, December.
    2. Gasselin, Pierre & Lardon, Sylvie & Cerdan, Claire & Loudiyi, Salma & Sautier, Denis, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), July.
    3. de Sainte Marie, Christine & Mariani, Mariagiulia & Millet, Morgane & Cerdan, Claire & Casabianca, François, 2020. "Can raw milk cheese and pasteurised milk cheese coexist? Unthinkable or never really considered?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), June.
    4. Danielle Galliano & Benoît Lallau & Jean-Marc Touzard, 2017. "Coexistences et transitions dans l’agriculture," Revue française de socio-Economie, La découverte, vol. 0(1), pages 23-30.
    5. Bertille Thareau & Clara Pailleux & Guilhem Anzalone, 2020. "How broadening social connections changes farmers’conceptions about biodiversity. Multiple links to biodiversity explored through the different socioprofessional paths of farmers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 241-259.
    6. Christophe Albaladejo, 2020. "The impossible and necessary coexistence of agricultural development models in the Pampas: the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina)," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 213-240.
    7. Geels, Frank W., 2010. "Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 495-510, May.
    8. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    9. Thareau, Bertille & Pailleux, Clara & Anzalone, Guilhem, 2020. "How broadening social connections changes farmers’ conceptions about biodiversity," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), April.
    10. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Post-Print hal-02911634, HAL.
    11. Nadège Garambois & Claire Aubron & Nathan Morsel & Myriam Latrille & Lucien Jallot & Valentin Lhoste, 2020. "The limits of coexistence: the development of “frugal” systems in agro-pastoral regions," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 311-337.
    12. Bertille Thareau & Clara Pailleux & Guilhem Anzalone, 2020. "How broadening social connections changes farmers’ conceptions about biodiversity," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 241-259, December.
    13. Bertrand HERVIEU & François PURSEIGLE, 2015. "The sociology of agricultural worlds:from a sociology of change to a sociology of coexistence," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(1), pages 59-90.
    14. HERVIEU, Bertrand & PURSEIGLE, François, 2015. "The sociology of agricultural worlds: from a sociology of change to a sociology of coexistence," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    15. Hervieu, Bertrand & Purseigle, François, 2015. "The sociology of agricultural worlds: from a sociology of change to a sociology of coexistence," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 59-90, March.
    16. Yuna Chiffoleau & Anne-Cécile Brit & Milo Monnier & Grégori Akermann & Maxime Lenormand & Florent Saucède, 2020. "Coexistence of supply chains in a city’s food supply: a factor for resilience?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 391-414.
    17. Christine Sainte Marie & Mariagiulia Mariani & Morgane Millet & Claire Cerdan & François Casabianca, 2020. "Can raw milk cheese and pasteurised milk cheese coexist? Unthinkable or never really considered?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 287-309, December.
    18. Christine de Sainte Marie & Mariagiulia Mariani & Morgane Millet & Claire Cerdan & François Casabianca, 2020. "Can raw milk cheese and pasteurised milk cheese coexist? Unthinkable or never really considered?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 287-309.
    19. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 339-361.
    20. Albaladejo, Christophe, 2020. "The impossible and necessary coexistence of agricultural development models in the Pampas: the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina)," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), March.
    21. Yannick Sencébé & Florence Pinton & Ademir Antonio Cazella, 2020. "On the unequal coexistence of agrifood systems in Brazil," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(1), pages 191-212.
    22. Christophe Albaladejo, 2020. "The impossible and necessary coexistence of agricultural development models in the Pampas: the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina)," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 213-240, December.
    23. Christophe Albaladejo, 2020. "The impossible and necessary coexistence of agricultural development models in the Pampas: the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina)," Post-Print hal-03161697, HAL.
    24. Yannick Sencébé & Florence Pinton & Ademir Antonio Cazella, 2020. "On the unequal coexistence of agrifood systems in Brazil," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 191-212, December.
    25. Sencébé, Yannick & Pinton, Florence & Cazella, Ademir Antonio, 2020. "On the unequal coexistence of agrifood systems in Brazil," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), February.
    26. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 339-361, December.
    27. Rémy, Clémentine & Cochet, Hubert, 2020. "“Win-win” agricultural investment projects put to the test: the case of the IDSP project as promoted by the World Bank in Zambia," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), August.
    28. Clémentine Rémy & Hubert Cochet, 2020. "“Win-win” agricultural investment projects put to the test: the case of the IDSP project as promoted by the World Bank in Zambia," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 363-389.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronan Velly & Annemarie Mol & Philip McMichael, 2021. "Book review symposium: Hugh Campbell: farming inside invisible worlds—modernist agriculture and its consequences," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 425-433, December.
    2. Camille Hochedez & Émilie Lanciano & Julien Noel & Séverine Saleilles, 2022. "Transition to the test of food justice : construction of a repertoire of practices in 5 initiatives in Angers, Lyon and Poitiers [La transition à l'épreuve de la justice alimentaire : construction ," Post-Print halshs-03930423, HAL.
    3. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Marcelo Sili & María Isabel Haag & María Belén Nieto, 2022. "Constructing the Transitions and Co-Existence of Rural Development Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Junko Kimura & Cyrille Rigolot, 2021. "The Potential of Geographical Indications (GI) to Enhance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Japan: Overview and Insights from Japan GI Mishima Potato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Gasselin & Nathalie Hostiou, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 173-190, December.
    2. Gasselin, Pierre & Hostiou, Nathalie, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), October.
    3. Marcelo Sili & María Isabel Haag & María Belén Nieto, 2022. "Constructing the Transitions and Co-Existence of Rural Development Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Gasselin, Pierre & Lardon, Sylvie & Cerdan, Claire & Loudiyi, Salma & Sautier, Denis, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), July.
    5. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 339-361, December.
    6. Pierre Gasselin & Sylvie Lardon & Claire Cerdan & Salma Loudiyi & Denis Sautier, 2020. "The coexistence of agricultural and food models at the territorial scale: an analytical framework for a research agenda," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 339-361.
    7. Revoyron, Eva & Le Bail, Marianne & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Gunnarsson, Anita & Seghetti, Marco & Colombo, Luca, 2022. "Diversity and drivers of crop diversification pathways of European farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Ryschawy, Julie & Tiffany, Sara & Gaudin, Amélie & Niles, Meredith T. & Garrett, Rachael D., 2021. "Moving niche agroecological initiatives to the mainstream: A case-study of sheep-vineyard integration in California," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Prost, Lorène, 2021. "Revitalizing agricultural sciences with design sciences," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Polge, Etienne & Pagès, Hugo, 2022. "Relational drivers of the agroecological transition: An analysis of farmer trajectories in the Limagne plain, France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Mariagiulia Mariani & François Casabianca & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2021. "Protecting Food Cultural Biodiversity: From Theory to Practice. Challenging the Geographical Indications and the Slow Food Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Bertille Thareau & Clara Pailleux & Guilhem Anzalone, 2020. "How broadening social connections changes farmers’ conceptions about biodiversity," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 241-259, December.
    13. B. Thareau & N. Seyni & T. Coisnon & P. Dupraz, 2023. "Designing carbon markets connecting farmers and companies: stakeholders claiming territorial-based devices to promote synergies between diverse environmental challenges," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 167-191, June.
    14. Yuna Chiffoleau & Anne-Cécile Brit & Milo Monnier & Grégori Akermann & Maxime Lenormand & Florent Saucède, 2020. "Coexistence of supply chains in a city’s food supply: a factor for resilience?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 391-414, December.
    15. Frédéric Goulet & Gabriela Giordano, 2017. "Searching for family farming in Argentina: chronicles of a technological innovation between two worlds," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 233-253, December.
    16. Chiffoleau, Yuna & Brit, Anne-Cécile & Monnier, Milo & Akermann, Grégori & Lenormand, Maxime & Saucède, Florent, 2020. "Coexistence of supply chains in a city’s food supply: a factor for resilience?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), September.
    17. Mariagiulia Mariani & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2022. "Cultural biodiversity unpacked, separating discourse from practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 773-789, June.
    18. Thareau, Bertille & Pailleux, Clara & Anzalone, Guilhem, 2020. "How broadening social connections changes farmers’ conceptions about biodiversity," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), April.
    19. Bertille Thareau & Clara Pailleux & Guilhem Anzalone, 2020. "How broadening social connections changes farmers’conceptions about biodiversity. Multiple links to biodiversity explored through the different socioprofessional paths of farmers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 241-259.
    20. Emma Tyrou & Guillaume Soullier & Mamadou Coulibaly, 2023. "Unpacking policies for the development of agricultural growth poles in West Africa," Post-Print hal-03983251, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rae:jouraf:v:101:y:2020:i:2-3:p:173-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Saux-Nogues (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.