IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3571-d351230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Protected Geographical Indications Evolving Due to Environmentally Related Justifications? An Analysis of Amendments in the Fruit and Vegetable Sector in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Marescotti

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Florence, 50127 Florence, Italy)

  • Xiomara F. Quiñones-Ruiz

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Hanna Edelmann

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Giovanni Belletti

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Florence, 50127 Florence, Italy)

  • Kristina Broscha

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Christine Altenbuchner

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Marianne Penker

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Silvia Scaramuzzi

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

Protected designations of origin (PDO) and Protected geographical indications (PGI) in the European Union have been recognized through a sound legal framework for more than three decades. We are recently witnessing an increased number of amendments to the product specifications of registered PDO/PGI. This paper aims to understand how PDO/PGI for the fruit and vegetables product class have evolved. Until 31 December 2018, there were 379 PDO/PGI registered under the fruit and vegetables product class and 81 amendments approved. We designed a coding guideline to: (i) analyze all the amendments to the product specifications; (ii) identify the type of rules that were modified; (iii) find out whether the amendments resulted in more flexible or more restrictive rules, and (iv) the respective justifications given by producers. We designed a database to manage all the information. Overall, amendments brought more flexible rules (particularly in Italy and Spain), while France showed a more diversified situation. Concerning the justifications stated by producers for amending the product specification, market changes, available new technology, and strengthening product quality were the most important, while environmental concerns were less relevant. Then, we in-depth analyzed the amendments that were explicitly justified with environmental reasons. The analysis showed only a light movement towards more environment-friendly rules, although environmental justifications were often used “indirectly”, as a means to achieve better marketing competitiveness, meeting new market demand and reducing production costs. These results seem consistent with previous studies, which indicated market forces as a primary motivation to amend product specifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Marescotti & Xiomara F. Quiñones-Ruiz & Hanna Edelmann & Giovanni Belletti & Kristina Broscha & Christine Altenbuchner & Marianne Penker & Silvia Scaramuzzi, 2020. "Are Protected Geographical Indications Evolving Due to Environmentally Related Justifications? An Analysis of Amendments in the Fruit and Vegetable Sector in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3571-:d:351230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3571/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3571/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barjolle, Dominique & Philippe, Jeanneaux, 2012. "Raising Rivals’ Costs Strategy and Localised Agro-Food Systems in Europe," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Valerie Boisvert, 2006. "From the conservation of genetic diversity to the promotion of quality foodstuff," Working Papers hal-03076946, HAL.
    3. Filippo Arfini & Federico Antonioli & Elena Cozzi & Michele Donati & Marianna Guareschi & Maria Cecilia Mancini & Mario Veneziani, 2019. "Sustainability, Innovation and Rural Development: The Case of Parmigiano-Reggiano PDO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Giovannucci, Daniele & Josling, Timothy & Kerr, William & O'Connor, Bernard & Yeung, May T., 2009. "Guide to Geographical Indications: Linking Products and Their Origins (Summary)," MPRA Paper 27955, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Filippo Arfini & Elena Cozzi & Maria Cecilia Mancini & Hugo Ferrer-Perez & José María Gil, 2019. "Are Geographical Indication Products Fostering Public Goods? Some Evidence from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Sarah Bowen & Tad Mutersbaugh, 2014. "Local or localized? Exploring the contributions of Franco-Mediterranean agrifood theory to alternative food research," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(2), pages 201-213, June.
    7. Dentoni, Domenico & Menozzi, Davide & Capelli, Maria Giacinta, 2012. "Group heterogeneity and cooperation on the geographical indication regulation: The case of the “Prosciutto di Parma” Consortium," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 207-216.
    8. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.
    9. Valerie Boisvert, 2006. "From the conservation of genetic diversity to the promotion of quality foodstuff," Post-Print hal-03076946, HAL.
    10. Quetier, Fabien & Marty, Pascal & Lepart, Jacques, 2005. "Farmers' management strategies and land use in an agropastoral landscape: roquefort cheese production rules as a driver of change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 171-193, May.
    11. Mariano Riccheri,, 2007. "Assessing the Applicability of Geographical Indications as a Means to Improve Environmental Quality in Affected Ecosystems and the Competitiveness of Agricultural Products," Working Papers id:847, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianni Barcaccia & Vincenzo D’Agostino & Alessandro Zotti & Bruno Cozzi, 2020. "Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 on the Italian Agri-Food Sector: An Analysis of the Quarter of Pandemic Lockdown and Clues for a Socio-Economic and Territorial Restart," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Teng-Fei Ma & Chang-Wei Chai & Tseng-Wei Chao, 2022. "On the Study of the Sustainable Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples’ Diets—Take the Protection of Geographical Indications as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Faustine Ruggieri & Cécile Coulon-Leroy & Armelle Mazé, 2023. "How Can Collective Action Support the Agroecological Transition in Geographical Indication Vineyards? Insights from the Loire Valley Wine Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Claire Bernard-Mongin & Jimmy Balouzat & Elise Chau & Alice Garnier & Stéphanie Lequin & François Lerin & Ahmet Veliji, 2021. "Geographical Indication Building Process for Sharr Cheese (Kosovo): “Inside Insights” on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Pagliacci, Francesco & Salpina, Dana, 2024. "Adapting to climate change: what really drives the choices of the producers of Geographical Indications?," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 13(3), October.
    6. Xiomara F. Quiñones-Ruiz, 2020. "The Diverging Understandings of Quality by Coffee Chain Actors—Insights from Colombian Producers and Austrian Roasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Junko Kimura & Cyrille Rigolot, 2021. "The Potential of Geographical Indications (GI) to Enhance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Japan: Overview and Insights from Japan GI Mishima Potato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Alessandro Gocci & Christoph Luetge & Hristos Vakoufaris, 2020. "Between Tradition and Sustainable Innovation: Empirical Evidence for the Role of Geographical Indications," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 101-101, September.
    10. Morgane Millet & Valerie Keast & Stefano Gonano & François Casabianca, 2020. "Product Qualification as a Means of Identifying Sustainability Pathways for Place-Based Agri-Food Systems: The Case of the GI Corsican Grapefruit (France)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Tobias Chilla & Benedikt Fink & Richard Balling & Simon Reitmeier & Karola Schober, 2020. "The EU Food Label ‘Protected Geographical Indication’: Economic Implications and Their Spatial Dimension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Pagliacci, Francesco & Salpina, Dana, 2022. "Territorial hotspots of exposure to climate disaster risk. The case of agri-food geographical indications in the Veneto Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Yamna Erraach & Fatma Jaafer & Ivana Radić & Mechthild Donner, 2021. "Sustainability Labels on Olive Oil: A Review on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Sara Cavagnero & Simona Giordano, 2022. "Sui Generis Geographical Indications Fostering Localized Sustainable Fashion: A Cross-Industry Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Maria Lisa Clodoveo & Ahmed Yangui & Mahdi Fendri & Simona Giordano & Pasquale Crupi & Filomena Corbo, 2021. "Protected Geographical Indications for EVOO in Tunisia: Towards Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-29, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilie Vandecandelaere & Luis Fernando Samper & Andrés Rey & Ana Daza & Pablo Mejía & Florence Tartanac & Massimo Vittori, 2021. "The Geographical Indication Pathway to Sustainability: A Framework to Assess and Monitor the Contributions of Geographical Indications to Sustainability through a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    3. Morgane Millet & François Casabianca, 2019. "Sharing Values for Changing Practices, a Lever for Sustainable Transformation? The Case of Farmers and Processors in Interaction within Localized Cheese Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Maria Lisa Clodoveo & Ahmed Yangui & Mahdi Fendri & Simona Giordano & Pasquale Crupi & Filomena Corbo, 2021. "Protected Geographical Indications for EVOO in Tunisia: Towards Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Chabrol, Didier & Mariani, Mariagiulia & Sautier, Denis, 2017. "Establishing Geographical Indications without State Involvement? Learning from Case Studies in Central and West Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 68-81.
    6. Barjolle, Dominique & Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F. & Bagal, Monique & Comoé, Hermann, 2017. "The Role of the State for Geographical Indications of Coffee: Case Studies from Colombia and Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 105-119.
    7. Monier-Dilhan Sylvette & Poméon Thomas & Böhm Michael & Brečić Ruzica & Csillag Peter & Donati Michele & Ferrer-Pérez Hugo & Gauvrit Lisa & Gil José M. & Hoàng Việt & Lilavanichakul Apichaya & Majewsk, 2021. "Do Food Quality Schemes and Net Price Premiums Go Together?," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 79-94, December.
    8. Filippo Arfini & Federico Antonioli & Elena Cozzi & Michele Donati & Marianna Guareschi & Maria Cecilia Mancini & Mario Veneziani, 2019. "Sustainability, Innovation and Rural Development: The Case of Parmigiano-Reggiano PDO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Peter Paul Reyes-Chávez & Mario del Roble Pensado-Leglise & Gustavo Cruz-Cárdenas & Rebeca Flores-Magallón, 2021. "The Hindrances to Obtaining Protected Geographical Indications for Products in Mexico. Case Study of Dairy Farming in the Cienega de Chapala, Michoacan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Sara Cavagnero & Simona Giordano, 2022. "Sui Generis Geographical Indications Fostering Localized Sustainable Fashion: A Cross-Industry Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2021. "How do local factors shape the regional adoption of geographical indications in Europe? Evidences from France, Italy and Spain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.
    14. Ivana Radić & Clara Monaco & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2023. "Establishing Communities of Value for Sustainable Localized Food Products: The Case of Mediterranean Olive Oil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Mariagiulia Mariani & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2022. "Cultural biodiversity unpacked, separating discourse from practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 773-789, June.
    16. Yari Vecchio & Abdul-Latif Iddrisu & Felice Adinolfi & Marcello De Rosa, 2020. "Geographical Indication to Build up Resilient Rural Economies: A Case Study from Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Ciliberti, Stefano & Frascarelli, Angelo & Polenzani, Bianca & Brunori, Gianluca & Martino, Gaetano, 2024. "Digitalisation strategies in the agri-food system: The case of PDO Parmigiano Reggiano," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    18. Mancini, Maria Cecilia & Consiglieri, Claudio, 2016. "Innovation and marketing strategies for PDO products: the case of “Parmigiano Reggiano” as an ingredient," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 5(2), September.
    19. Marie-Vivien, Delphine & Biénabe, Estelle, 2017. "The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "Mapping Online Geographical Indication: Agrifood Products on E-Commerce Shelves of Mercosur and the European Union," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3571-:d:351230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.