IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9649-d623389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Romanian Agricultural Output within the Context of Green Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Nicoleta Valentina Florea

    (Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Mircea Constantin Duică

    (Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Constantin Aurelian Ionescu

    (Faculty of Economics, Hyperion University of Bucharest, 030615 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Anișoara Duică

    (Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Mihaela Cristina Onica Ibinceanu

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration Business, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania)

  • Sorina Geanina Stanescu

    (Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Science and Technology, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the trends in agriculture and the factors affecting the output of agriculture (OA) in the EU and Romania in the context of green economy. The research used the quantitative (mathematical regression function, correlation matrix, and R-squared) and qualitative (the SWOT matrix of the agriculture sector in Romania) methods. The data on Romanian agriculture were gathered from Eurostat for the period of 2006–2019. The results showed that there is a direct and positive relationship between the OA and its influencing factors. Moreover, it revealed the negative relationships between the employees in agriculture (−0.58), air pollutants (−0.49), agriculture land (−0.42), irrigation norm (−0.39), agriculture training (−0.33) and the OA, and positive relationships between the area under organic farming (0.56), the average area per holding (0.56), the number of tractors (0.53) and the OA. Romania is a country where employment and agriculture areas are greater than in other EU countries; however, the results of our research highlight the significance of a careful analysis of the influencing factors, of making the difference between the thin line of sustainable performance, of developing new measures, of reducing risks, and of gaining new knowledge and agricultural skills, as an important activity, especially for Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicoleta Valentina Florea & Mircea Constantin Duică & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Anișoara Duică & Mihaela Cristina Onica Ibinceanu & Sorina Geanina Stanescu, 2021. "An Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Romanian Agricultural Output within the Context of Green Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9649-:d:623389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosegrant, Mark W. & Koo, Jawoo & Cenacchi, Nicola & Ringler, Claudia & Robertson, Richard D. & Fisher, Myles & Cox, Cindy M. & Garrett, Karen & Perez, Nicostrato D. & Sabbagh, Pascale, 2014. "Synopsis of Food security in a world of natural resource scarcity: The role of agricultural technologies:," Issue briefs 81, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Bunkus, Ramona & Theesfeld, Insa, 2018. "Land Grabbing In Europe?," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275859, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Tugendhat, Henry & Alemu, Dawit, 2016. "Chinese Agricultural Training Courses for African Officials: Between Power and Partnerships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 71-81.
    4. Liu, Yanyan & Yamauchi, Futoshi, 2014. "Population density, migration, and the returns to human capital and land: Insights from Indonesia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 182-193.
    5. Keith Fuglie & Boubaker Dhehibi & Ali Ahmed Ibrahim El Shahat & Aden Aw‐Hassan, 2021. "Water, Policy, and Productivity in Egyptian Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1378-1397, August.
    6. Cavallo, Eugenio & Ferrari, Ester & Bollani, Luigi & Coccia, Mario, 2014. "Attitudes and behaviour of adopters of technological innovations in agricultural tractors: A case study in Italian agricultural system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-54.
    7. Bravo-Ortega, Claudio & Lederman, Daniel, 2005. "Agriculture and national welfare around the world: causality and international heterogeneity since 1960," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3499, The World Bank.
    8. Matin Qaim, 2020. "Role of New Plant Breeding Technologies for Food Security and Sustainable Agricultural Development," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 129-150, June.
    9. Liu, Yanyan & Yamauchi, Futoshi, 2014. "Population pressures, migration, and the returns to human capital and land : insights from Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6790, The World Bank.
    10. David-Nicolae CRECANĂ & Cornel-Dumitru CRECANĂ, 2019. "Increasing the Performance of Agricultural Holdings in Romania - an Imperative for their Management," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(2), pages 112-121, March.
    11. Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2021. "The Role of Information in Agricultural Technology Adoption: Experimental Evidence from Rice Farmers in Uganda," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(3), pages 1239-1272.
    12. Jianxu Liu & Mengjiao Wang & Li Yang & Sanzidur Rahman & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2020. "Agricultural Productivity Growth and Its Determinants in South and Southeast Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Shurui Zhang & Shuo Wang & Lingran Yuan & Xiaoguang Liu & Binlei Gong, 2020. "The impact of epidemics on agricultural production and forecast of COVID-19," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 409-425, July.
    14. Christiaensen, Luc & Demery, Lionel & Kuhl, Jesper, 2011. "The (evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction--An empirical perspective," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 239-254, November.
    15. Ayu Pratiwi & Aya Suzuki, 2017. "Effects of farmers’ social networks on knowledge acquisition: lessons from agricultural training in rural Indonesia," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Sirio Rossano Secondo Cividino & Gianfranco Pergher & Nicola Zucchiatti & Rino Gubiani, 2018. "Agricultural Health and Safety Survey in Friuli Venezia Giulia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Ramona Bunkus & Insa Theesfeld, 2018. "Land Grabbing in Europe? Socio-Cultural Externalities of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in East Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2007. "Why are cooperatives important in agriculture? An organizational economics perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 55-69, April.
    19. Li-li Wang & Yue-wu Wang & Wen-ming Sun, 2013. "Study on the Relationship Between Human Capital Management and Agricultural Enterprise Performance—Based on Different Marketing Strategy," Springer Books, in: Ershi Qi & Jiang Shen & Runliang Dou (ed.), Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, edition 127, pages 827-835, Springer.
    20. Cvijanović, Drago & Jonel, Subic & Jean, Andrei, 2014. "Sustainable agriculture and rural development in terms of the republic of Serbia strategic goals realization within the Danube region. Rural development and (un)limited resources," MPRA Paper 58558, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 May 2014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oana Coca & Diana Creangă & Ștefan Viziteu & Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Gavril Ștefan, 2023. "Analysis of the Determinants of Agriculture Performance at the European Union Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Vargas-Hernández José G. & Rakowska Joanna & Vargas-González Omar C., 2022. "Green Economic Development as the Framework for Green Finance and Green Investment," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 15(3), pages 304-322, September.
    3. Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Marius Dalian Doran, 2022. "Financing the Agri-Environmental Policy: Consequences on the Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Yinglei Deng & Fusheng Zeng, 2023. "Sustainable Path of Food Security in China under the Background of Green Agricultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Grzegorz Oleniacz, 2021. "Czekanowski’s Diagram and Spatial Data Cluster Analysis for Planning Sustainable Development of Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Bianca-Florentina Nistoroiu & Mile Vasic & Iuliana Nicolae & Vasilii Erokhin & Ovidiu Condeainu, 2024. "Exploring Key Stakeholders in the Romanian Food Chain: An Analysis of European Influences and Local Dynamics," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 1, pages 86-94.
    7. Florin Mihai & Ofelia Ema Aleca & Emilia Gogu & Cosmin Dobrin & Mirela Gheorghe, 2021. "The Challenges of the Green Economy in Romania. Scientific Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Zaharia Alina & Shonkwiler Vanessa P. & Mocanu Steliana & Tudorache Claudiu, 2024. "The Role of Climate Change, Employment, Government Expenditure, and Imports on the Value of Agricultural Production in Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1671-1681.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kibrom A. Abay & Lina Abdelfattah & Hoda El‐Enbaby & Mai Mahmoud & Clemens Breisinger, 2022. "Plot size and sustainable input intensification in smallholder irrigated agriculture: Evidence from Egypt," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 792-810, September.
    2. Agnieszka Stacherzak & Maria Hełdak & Ladislav Hájek & Katarzyna Przybyła, 2019. "State Interventionism in Agricultural Land Turnover in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Tharakan, Joe & Lefèvre, Mélanie, 2011. "Intermediaries, transport costs and interlinked transactions," CEPR Discussion Papers 8615, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Sattwick Dey Biswas, 2021. "Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 68(4), pages 465-484, December.
    5. Andi Syah Putra & Guangji Tong & Didit Okta Pribadi, 2020. "Spatial Analysis of Socio-Economic Driving Factors of Food Expenditure Variation between Provinces in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Tomasz Berbeka & Tomasz Szuk & Aleksandra Plonka, 2021. "Land Concentration Processes: Polish Case Study in the Light of Selected EU Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 325-337.
    7. Maria & Irham & Slamet Hartono & Lestari Rahayu Waluyati, 2022. "The effect of environmental awareness on motivation in adopting farming conservation techniques in the various agro-ecological zones: a case study in critical land of Java Island, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1878-1896, February.
    8. Mohamed Abdouli & Anis Omri, 2021. "Exploring the Nexus Among FDI Inflows, Environmental Quality, Human Capital, and Economic Growth in the Mediterranean Region," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 788-810, June.
    9. Shirzad, Hossein & Barati, Ali Akbar & Ehteshammajd, Shaghayegh & Goli, Imaneh & Siamian, Narges & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Pour, Mahdad & Tan, Rong & Janečková, Kristina & Sklenička, Petr & Azadi,, 2022. "Agricultural land tenure system in Iran: An overview," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Grzegorz Oleniacz, 2021. "Czekanowski’s Diagram and Spatial Data Cluster Analysis for Planning Sustainable Development of Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Kalandi Charan Pradhan & K. Narayanan, 2019. "Intensity of labour migration and its determinants: insights from Indian semi-arid villages," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 955-994, October.
    12. Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Hamid Rastegari Kopaei & Dacinia Crina Petrescu, 2021. "What Drives Landowners to Resist Selling Their Land? Insights from Ethical Capitalism and Landowners’ Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Todoran, Silviu Ciprian & Petrescu-Mag, Ioan Valentin, 2021. "Us and them. Is the COVID-19 pandemic a driver for xenophobia in land transactions in Romania?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Davide Facchinetti & Stefano Santoro & Lavinia Eleonora Galli & Domenico Pessina, 2021. "Agricultural Tractor Roll-Over Related Fatalities in Italy: Results from a 12 Years Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    15. von Hobe, Cord-Friedrich & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2020. "On the effectiveness of restricted tenders as a form of policy intervention on agricultural land markets," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305592, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    16. Jayne, T.S. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Headey, Derek D., 2014. "Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: A synthesis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-17.
    17. Nobuhiko Fuwa & Arsenio M. Balisacan & Fabrizio Bresciani, 2015. "In Search of a Strategy for Making Growth More Pro-Poor in the Philippines," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 14(1), pages 202-226, Winter/Sp.
    18. Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian, 2019. "Narratives in Economic Modelling: A new kid on the block?," Conference papers 333077, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Lucia Palšová & Anna Bandlerová & Zina Machničová, 2021. "Land Concentration and Land Grabbing Processes—Evidence from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Ramona Bunkus & Ilkhom Soliev & Insa Theesfeld, 2020. "Density of resident farmers and rural inhabitants’ relationship to agriculture: operationalizing complex social interactions with a structural equation model," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 47-63, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9649-:d:623389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.