IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v37y2020i1d10.1007_s10460-019-09966-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Density of resident farmers and rural inhabitants’ relationship to agriculture: operationalizing complex social interactions with a structural equation model

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Bunkus

    (Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Ilkhom Soliev

    (Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Insa Theesfeld

    (Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg)

Abstract

The presence of agriculture is diminishing in today’s society: it provides only a small percentage of jobs, and the number of visible farms that can provide exposure to agricultural processes is continuously decreasing. We hypothesize that the direct involvement with farm activities or interaction with farmers and visual appreciation of agricultural processes of all kinds, influences rural inhabitants’ relationship to agriculture. We assume that the latter plays a role in how far inhabitants are attached to their place, and more specifically, perceive rural place. In this paper, we aim to initiate a discussion on this complex social relationship and suggest a model to capture fine interactions between relationship to agriculture and rural place attachment. We examine the direct and indirect effects from the density of resident farmers on these interactions. We set up a model using data from empirical research in Germany conducted in 2016. We surveyed rural inhabitants and interviewed farmers in villages purposefully sampled based on high and low density of resident farmers. To reveal underlying relationships among the latent constructs and more directly measurable indicators, as well as the indirect effect of farm presence on place attachment through its effect on forming perceptions about agriculture, we operationalized our analysis using a structural equation model. Besides a good model fit, our initial results indicate that rural inhabitants form stronger relationship to agriculture when the density of resident farmers is higher. Further, farm presence and attachment to rural place are positively related, but needs to be better captured.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Bunkus & Ilkhom Soliev & Insa Theesfeld, 2020. "Density of resident farmers and rural inhabitants’ relationship to agriculture: operationalizing complex social interactions with a structural equation model," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 47-63, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:37:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-019-09966-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-019-09966-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-019-09966-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-019-09966-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bunkus, Ramona & Theesfeld, Insa, 2018. "Land Grabbing In Europe?," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275859, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 2014. "Property rights and sustainable irrigation: A developing country perspective," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 23-31.
    3. Jantsch, Antje & Wunder, Christoph & Hirschauer, Norbert, 2016. "Lebensqualität In Deutschland – Ein Vergleich Von Ländlichen Und Städtischen Regionen," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244798, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Weiß, Wolfgang & Wolz, Axel & Herzfeld, Thomas & Fritzsch, Jana, 2013. "Sozialökonomische Effekte des demographischen Wandels in ländlichen Räumen Sachsen-Anhalts," IAMO Discussion Papers 163334, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    5. Minh Ngo & Michael Brklacich, 2014. "New farmers’ efforts to create a sense of place in rural communities: insights from southern Ontario, Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(1), pages 53-67, March.
    6. Brian Obach & Kathleen Tobin, 2014. "Civic agriculture and community engagement," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(2), pages 307-322, June.
    7. Gao, Shengyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Johnston, Robert A., 2008. "Non-normality of Data in Structural Equation Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7nf8f0v7, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Curtis Stofferahn & Cordell Fontaine & Douglas McDonald & Mike Spletto & Holly Jeanotte, 1991. "Growth fundamentalism in dying rural towns:Implications for rural development practitioners," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 8(3), pages 25-34, June.
    9. repec:zbw:iamodp:163334 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Koomen, E., 2011. "Indicators of rural vitality. A GIS-based analysis of socio-economic development of the rural Netherlands," Serie Research Memoranda 0050, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Gao, Shengyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Johnston, Robert A., 2008. "Non-normality of Data in Structural Equation Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7nf8f0v7, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Hinojosa, Leonith & Lambin, Eric F. & Mzoughi, Naoufel & Napoléone, Claude, 2016. "Place attachment as a factor of mountain farming permanence: A survey in the French Southern Alps," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 308-315.
    13. Jyoti Rao, 2018. "Functionings of Land," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-13-1441-4, June.
    14. Rick Welsh, 2009. "Farm and market structure, industrial regulation and rural community welfare: conceptual and methodological issues," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(1), pages 21-28, March.
    15. Bas Pedroli & Teresa Pinto Correia & Jørgen Primdahl, 2016. "Challenges for a shared European countryside of uncertain future. Towards a modern community-based landscape perspective," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 450-460, May.
    16. Rao, Jyoti, 2018. "Fundamental Functionings of Landowners: Understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of ‘capability’," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-84.
    17. Ramona Bunkus & Insa Theesfeld, 2018. "Land Grabbing in Europe? Socio-Cultural Externalities of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in East Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Linda Lobao & Curtis Stofferahn, 2008. "The community effects of industrialized farming: Social science research and challenges to corporate farming laws," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(2), pages 219-240, June.
    19. Paul Nkegbe & Abdelkrim Araar & Benjamin Abu & Yazidu Ustarz & Hamdiyah Alhassan & Edinam Dope Setsoafia & Shamsia Abdul-Wahab, 2018. "Rural Non-Farm Engagement and Agriculture Commercialization in Ghana: Complements or Competitors?," Working Papers PMMA 2018-07, PEP-PMMA.
    20. Jillian l. Moroney & Rebecca Som Castellano, 2018. "Farmland loss and concern in the Treasure Valley," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 529-536, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theesfeld, Insa & Soliev, Ilkhom & Bunkus, Ramona, 2020. "Social Dimensions of Agricultural Land Transactions in Germany: An Analysis with a Structural Equation Model," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305582, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Xiaowan Dong & Yuhui Xu & Xiangmei Li, 2023. "The Proactive Effects of Built Environment on Rural Community Resilience: Evidence from China Family Panel Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Wachter, Magdalena & Wytrzens, Hans Karl, 2022. "Barn or building lot? A cross-case comparison viewing the role of agricultural interests in Austria’s local spatial planning processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Theesfeld, Insa & Soliev, Ilkhom & Bunkus, Ramona, 2020. "Social Dimensions of Agricultural Land Transactions in Germany: An Analysis with a Structural Equation Model," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305582, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Sarkar, Apurbo & Azim, Jony Abdul & Asif, Abdullah Al & Qian, Lu & Peau, Anamika Kor, 2021. "Structural equation modeling for indicators of sustainable agriculture: Prospective of a developing country’s agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Azadi, Hossein, 2022. "From scythe to smartphone: Rural transformation in Romania evidenced by the perception of rural land and population," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theesfeld, Insa & Soliev, Ilkhom & Bunkus, Ramona, 2020. "Social Dimensions of Agricultural Land Transactions in Germany: An Analysis with a Structural Equation Model," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305582, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Theesfeld, Insa & Soliev, Ilkhom & Bunkus, Ramona, 2020. "Social Dimensions of Agricultural Land Transactions in Germany: An Analysis with a Structural Equation Model," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305582, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    4. Agnieszka Stacherzak & Maria Hełdak & Ladislav Hájek & Katarzyna Przybyła, 2019. "State Interventionism in Agricultural Land Turnover in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Sattwick Dey Biswas, 2021. "Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 68(4), pages 465-484, December.
    6. Tomasz Berbeka & Tomasz Szuk & Aleksandra Plonka, 2021. "Land Concentration Processes: Polish Case Study in the Light of Selected EU Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 325-337.
    7. Jill Harrison & Christy Getz, 2015. "Farm size and job quality: mixed-methods studies of hired farm work in California and Wisconsin," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 617-634, December.
    8. Shirzad, Hossein & Barati, Ali Akbar & Ehteshammajd, Shaghayegh & Goli, Imaneh & Siamian, Narges & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Pour, Mahdad & Tan, Rong & Janečková, Kristina & Sklenička, Petr & Azadi,, 2022. "Agricultural land tenure system in Iran: An overview," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Khalid K. Naji & Murat Gunduz & Fahid Al-Henzab, 2024. "Evaluating the Digital Transformation Potential in Pre-Construction for Sustainable Practices Using Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Malek Simon Grimm & Ralf Wagner, 2024. "Challenging the linearity assumption of intra-brand image confusion," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 355-374, June.
    11. Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Hamid Rastegari Kopaei & Dacinia Crina Petrescu, 2021. "What Drives Landowners to Resist Selling Their Land? Insights from Ethical Capitalism and Landowners’ Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Todoran, Silviu Ciprian & Petrescu-Mag, Ioan Valentin, 2021. "Us and them. Is the COVID-19 pandemic a driver for xenophobia in land transactions in Romania?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. von Hobe, Cord-Friedrich & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2020. "On the effectiveness of restricted tenders as a form of policy intervention on agricultural land markets," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305592, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. Thom, Rowan Ropata Macgregor & Grimes, Arthur, 2022. "Land loss and the intergenerational transmission of wellbeing: The experience of iwi in Aotearoa New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    16. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Farida Saleem & Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Muhammad Imran Malik & Alawiya Allui, 2020. "Revisiting Stakeholder Theory and Environmentalism: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Lucia Palšová & Anna Bandlerová & Zina Machničová, 2021. "Land Concentration and Land Grabbing Processes—Evidence from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Michela Gnaldi & Simone Del Sarto, 2024. "Validating Corruption Risk Measures: A Key Step to Monitoring SDG Progress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1045-1071, December.
    20. Yunxia Liu & Xunpeng Shi & Ya Ping Wang & Tao Sun, 2019. "Promoting Green Residential Buildings in China: Bridging the Gap between Design and Operation to Improve Occupants’ Residential Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:37:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-019-09966-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.