IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9592-d622186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Seismic and Energy Retrofit Interventions on a URM Masonry Building: The Case Study of the Former Courthouse in Fabriano

Author

Listed:
  • Amedeo Caprino

    (Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Filippo Lorenzoni

    (Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Laura Carnieletto

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Leonardo Feletto

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Michele De Carli

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Francesca da Porto

    (Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Following the 2016 central Italy earthquakes, the high seismic vulnerability of existing buildings is once again at the center of the debate. Indeed, the majority of the Italian building stock (around 60%) was built before adopting the first seismic provisions (1974) and in a territory entirely characterized by medium to high levels of seismic hazard. On the other hand, the first provisions addressing thermal performance criteria were introduced in 1976 but with limited impact. A consistent reduction in energy consumption was further achieved in 1991, when even more buildings were erected. As a consequence, the Italian building stock is characterized by reduced seismic capacity and poor energy efficiency and, to optimize the available resources, combined retrofit interventions approaches are required. In this context, a synergic strategy for the seismic and energy retrofit of a unreinforced masonry (URM) building was proposed. The former Courthouse in Fabriano (Ancona, Marche), a strategic, three-story, unreinforced masonry building in the network of permanent monitoring systems of the Italian Department of Civil Protection, was selected as a case study. The overall effectiveness of various solutions of combined structural refurbishment and energy retrofit interventions, having different levels of invasiveness on the building, was assessed. In addition, a common methodology based on the expected annual losses allowed evaluating the financial feasibility of the proposed integrated interventions and estimating the changes in the return of the retrofitting investment in various seismic and climate zones. The results also show how the payback period could be significantly reduced by incentives and regulatory frameworks that currently favour the execution of integrated interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amedeo Caprino & Filippo Lorenzoni & Laura Carnieletto & Leonardo Feletto & Michele De Carli & Francesca da Porto, 2021. "Integrated Seismic and Energy Retrofit Interventions on a URM Masonry Building: The Case Study of the Former Courthouse in Fabriano," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9592-:d:622186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akkurt, G.G. & Aste, N. & Borderon, J. & Buda, A. & Calzolari, M. & Chung, D. & Costanzo, V. & Del Pero, C. & Evola, G. & Huerto-Cardenas, H.E. & Leonforte, F. & Lo Faro, A. & Lucchi, E. & Marletta, L, 2020. "Dynamic thermal and hygrometric simulation of historical buildings: Critical factors and possible solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Maria Rosa Valluzzi & Elisa Saler & Alberto Vignato & Matteo Salvalaggio & Giorgio Croatto & Giorgia Dorigatti & Umberto Turrini, 2021. "Nested Buildings: An Innovative Strategy for the Integrated Seismic and Energy Retrofit of Existing Masonry Buildings with CLT Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Paolo La Greca & Giuseppe Margani, 2018. "Seismic and Energy Renovation Measures for Sustainable Cities: A Critical Analysis of the Italian Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Giuseppe Margani & Gianpiero Evola & Carola Tardo & Edoardo Michele Marino, 2020. "Energy, Seismic, and Architectural Renovation of RC Framed Buildings with Prefabricated Timber Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Pozza & Anna Degli Esposti & Alessandra Bonoli & Diego Talledo & Luca Barbaresi & Giovanni Semprini & Marco Savoia, 2021. "Multidisciplinary Performance Assessment of an Eco-Sustainable RC-Framed Skin for the Integrated Upgrading of Existing Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Rayane de Lima Moura Paiva & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Adriana Paiva de Souza Martins & Patricia Brandão de Sousa & Giulia Fea de Oliveira & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, 2021. "Thermal-Energy Analysis and Life Cycle GHG Emissions Assessments of Innovative Earth-Based Bamboo Plastering Mortars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Gianpiero Evola & Vincenzo Costanzo & Luigi Marletta, 2021. "Hygrothermal and Acoustic Performance of Two Innovative Envelope Renovation Solutions Developed in the e-SAFE Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Roberta Pernetti & Riccardo Pinotti & Roberto Lollini, 2021. "Repository of Deep Renovation Packages Based on Industrialized Solutions: Definition and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Agnieszka Leśniak & Monika Górka & Izabela Skrzypczak, 2021. "Barriers to BIM Implementation in Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Projects—The Polish Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Theodosiou, Theodoros & Tsikaloudaki, Katerina & Kontoleon, Karolos & Giarma, Christina, 2021. "Assessing the accuracy of predictive thermal bridge heat flow methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. James Allen & Ari Halberstadt & John Powers & Nael H. El-Farra, 2020. "An Optimization-Based Supervisory Control and Coordination Approach for Solar-Load Balancing in Building Energy Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Emil-Sever Georgescu & Mihaela Stela Georgescu & Zina Macri & Edoardo Michele Marino & Giuseppe Margani & Vasile Meita & Radu Pana & Santi Maria Cascone & Horia Petran & Pier Paolo Rossi & Vincenzo Sa, 2018. "Seismic and Energy Renovation: A Review of the Code Requirements and Solutions in Italy and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-36, May.
    9. Paweł Sokołowski & Grzegorz Nawalany & Małgorzata Michalik, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of Flooring Material and Construction Solutions on Heat Exchange with the Ground in a Historic Wooden Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Alessia Buda & Ernst Jan de Place Hansen & Alexander Rieser & Emanuela Giancola & Valeria Natalina Pracchi & Sara Mauri & Valentina Marincioni & Virginia Gori & Kalliopi Fouseki & Cristina S. Polo Lóp, 2021. "Conservation-Compatible Retrofit Solutions in Historic Buildings: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Antonio Artino & Riccardo Caponetto & Gianpiero Evola & Giuseppe Margani & Edoardo Michele Marino & Emanuele Murgano, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Sustainable Seismic and Energy Renovation of Buildings: Methodological Layout," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Paweł Sokołowski & Grzegorz Nawalany & Tomasz Jakubowski & Ernest Popardowski & Vasyl Lopushniak & Atilgan Atilgan, 2022. "Numerical Analysis of Thermal Impact between the Cooling Facility and the Ground," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Matteo Busselli & Davide Cassol & Alessandro Prada & Ivan Giongo, 2021. "Timber Based Integrated Techniques to Improve Energy Efficiency and Seismic Behaviour of Existing Masonry Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Luka Lulić & Karlo Ožić & Tomislav Kišiček & Ivan Hafner & Mislav Stepinac, 2021. "Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment—Case Study of the Educational Building after the Zagreb Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Giuseppe Margani & Gianpiero Evola & Carola Tardo & Edoardo Michele Marino, 2020. "Energy, Seismic, and Architectural Renovation of RC Framed Buildings with Prefabricated Timber Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Dragos Bocan & Catalina Bocan & Alexandra Keller & Aurelian Gruin, 2024. "Analysis of Thermal Rehabilitation and Seismic Strengthening Solutions Suitable for Heritage Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Francesco Smiroldo & Isabella Paviani & Ivan Giongo & Stefano Zanon & Rossano Albatici & Maurizio Piazza, 2021. "An Integrated Approach to Improve Seismic and Energetic Behaviour of RC Framed Buildings Using Timber Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    18. Nikolaos Ziozas & Angeliki Kitsopoulou & Evangelos Bellos & Petros Iliadis & Dimitra Gonidaki & Komninos Angelakoglou & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos & Silvia Ricciuti & Diego Viesi, 2024. "Energy Performance Analysis of the Renovation Process in an Italian Cultural Heritage Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Egusquiza, A. & Ginestet, S. & Espada, J.C. & Flores-Abascal, I. & Garcia-Gafaro, C. & Giraldo-Soto, C. & Claude, S. & Escadeillas, G., 2021. "Co-creation of local eco-rehabilitation strategies for energy improvement of historic urban areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Zenonas Turskis & Nikolaj Goranin & Assel Nurusheva & Seilkhan Boranbayev, 2019. "A Fuzzy WASPAS-Based Approach to Determine Critical Information Infrastructures of EU Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9592-:d:622186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.