IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p5928-d388751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment of Wastewater: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Wudneh Ayele Shewa

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

  • Martha Dagnew

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

Abstract

Chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) is a process that uses coagulant and/or flocculant chemicals to remove suspended solids, organic carbon, and nutrients from wastewater. Although it is not a new technology, it has received much attention in recent years due to its increased treatment capacity and related benefits compared to the conventional primary treatment process. CEPT involves both physical and chemical processes. Alum and iron salts are the commonly used coagulants in CEPT. Several types of anionic, cationic, and uncharged polymers are used as flocculants, where poly aluminum chloride (PACL) and polyacrylamide (PAM) are the widely used ones. Some of the coagulants and flocculants used may have inhibitory and/or toxicity effects on downstream treatment and recovery processes. There has been an increasing amount of work on the treatment of wastewaters from various sources using CEPT. These wastewaters can range from municipal/domestic wastewater, combined sewer overflow, landfill leachate, cattle manure digestate to wastewaters from textile industry, pulp and paper mill, slaughterhouse, milk processing plant, tannery and others. In recent cases, CEPT is employed to enhance carbon redirection for recovery and substantially reduce the organic load to secondary treatment processes. CEPTs can remove between 43.1–95.6% of COD, 70.0–99.5% suspended solids, and 40.0–99.3% of phosphate depending on the characteristics of wastewater treated and type of coagulants and/or flocculants used. This article reviews the application, chemicals used so far, removal efficiencies, challenges, and environmental impacts of CEPT.

Suggested Citation

  • Wudneh Ayele Shewa & Martha Dagnew, 2020. "Revisiting Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment of Wastewater: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5928-:d:388751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga Popovic & Fabrizio Gioelli & Elio Dinuccio & Luca Rollè & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Centrifugation of Digestate: The Effect of Chitosan on Separation Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Cano, R. & Pérez-Elvira, S.I. & Fdz-Polanco, F., 2015. "Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 176-185.
    3. Xinhao Luo & Chen Liang & Yongyou Hu, 2019. "Comparison of Different Enhanced Coagulation Methods for Azo Dye Removal from Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Siong-Chin Chua & Fai-Kait Chong & M. A. Malek & Muhammad Raza Ul Mustafa & Norli Ismail & Wawan Sujarwo & Jun-Wei Lim & Yeek-Chia Ho, 2020. "Optimized Use of Ferric Chloride and Sesbania Seed Gum (SSG) as Sustainable Coagulant Aid for Turbidity Reduction in Drinking Water Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camilo C. Castro-Jiménez & Julio C. Saldarriaga-Molina & Edwin F. García & Mauricio A. Correa-Ochoa, 2022. "Primary Treatment of Domestic Wastewater with the Use of Unmodified and Chemically Modified Drinking Water Treatment Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    2. A. Chini & C. E. Hollas & A. C. Bolsan & F. G. Antes & H. Treichel & A. Kunz, 2021. "Treatment of digestate from swine sludge continuous stirred tank reactor to reduce total carbon and total solids content," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12326-12341, August.
    3. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Elena A. Tarkhanova, 2020. "Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Ibrahim Muntaqa Tijjani Usman & Yeek-Chia Ho & Lavania Baloo & Man-Kee Lam & Pau-Loke Show & Wawan Sujarwo, 2023. "Comprehensive Review of Modification, Optimisation, and Characterisation Methods Applied to Plant-Based Natural Coagulants (PBNCs) for Water and Wastewater Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Syed-Hassan, Syed Shatir A. & Wang, Yi & Hu, Song & Su, Sheng & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: Fundamentals, challenges and considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 888-913.
    6. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    8. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    9. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    10. Yan, Peng & Shi, Hong-Xin & Chen, You-Peng & Gao, Xu & Fang, Fang & Guo, Jin-Song, 2020. "Optimization of recovery and utilization pathway of chemical energy from wastewater pollutants by a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Panepinto, Deborah & Fiore, Silvia & Zappone, Mariantonia & Genon, Giuseppe & Meucci, Lorenza, 2016. "Evaluation of the energy efficiency of a large wastewater treatment plant in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 404-411.
    12. Bhattacharya, Madhuchhanda & Basak, Tanmay, 2016. "A review on the susceptor assisted microwave processing of materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 306-338.
    13. Ghasimi, Dara S.M. & de Kreuk, Merle & Maeng, Sung Kyu & Zandvoort, Marcel H. & van Lier, Jules B., 2016. "High-rate thermophilic bio-methanation of the fine sieved fraction from Dutch municipal raw sewage: Cost-effective potentials for on-site energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 569-582.
    14. Bruna Rijo & Catarina Nobre & Paulo Brito & Paulo Ferreira, 2024. "An Overview of the Thermochemical Valorization of Sewage Sludge: Principles and Current Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Liu, Huan & Yi, Linlin & Zhang, Qiang & Hu, Hongyun & Lu, Geng & Li, Aijun & Yao, Hong, 2016. "Co-production of clean syngas and ash adsorbent during sewage sludge gasification: Synergistic effect of Fenton peroxidation and CaO conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1062-1068.
    16. Akgul, Deniz & Cella, Monica Angela & Eskicioglu, Cigdem, 2017. "Influences of low-energy input microwave and ultrasonic pretreatments on single-stage and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of municipal wastewater sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 271-282.
    17. Zainab Naseem & Muhammad Naveed & Hafiz Naeem Asghar & Mansoor Hameed, 2022. "Metal Resistant Enterobacter cloacae ZA14 Enhanced Seedling Vigor and Metal Tolerance through Improved Growth, Physiology and Antioxidants in Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) Irrigated with Textile Eff," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    19. Aiya Chantarasiri, 2020. "Klebsiella and Enterobacter Isolated from Mangrove Wetland Soils in Thailand and Their Application in Biological Decolorization of Textile Reactive Dyes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2019. "Improvement of energy recovery from the digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) through intermediate treatments: The effect of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the first-stage digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 191-204.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5928-:d:388751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.