IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i12p2302-d122538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Centrifugation of Digestate: The Effect of Chitosan on Separation Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Popovic

    (Chair of Production Systems, Organization and Management, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Fabrizio Gioelli

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy)

  • Elio Dinuccio

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy)

  • Luca Rollè

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy)

  • Paolo Balsari

    (Chair of Production Systems, Organization and Management, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
    Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy)

Abstract

Mechanical separation of co-digestate removes dry matter (DM) and phosphorous (P) from digestate effectively but is less capable at removing nitrogen (N) and potash (K). Adding flocculants can enhance separator efficiency. However, information on the use of chitosan as flocculant for co-digestate and its effects on amended slurry application to soil is scarce. This study undertook a series of trial and error tests to identify the optimal chitosan dose to be applied to co-digestate. Four chitosan doses were evaluated: 120 (Dose 1), 240 (Dose 2), 360 (Dose 3), and 480 (Dose 4) mL L −1 of co-digestate. After optimal dose application, centrifugation was employed to separate the co-digestate (centrifugation tests). We used simple separation indices to evaluate the effectiveness of chitosan addition prior to centrifuge usage. Dose optimization tests results indicated that incremental doses of chitosan had no effect ( p > 0.05) on total N and it decreased ( p < 0.05) total P removal to solids. Dose 3 showed a superior effect based on the physical characteristics evaluated and on the DM content of the fractions produced. Centrifugation tests results showed chitosan increased ( p < 0.05) centrifugation efficiency for K, copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) (75, 36, and 51%, respectively) and had no effect on total N or P. The major findings show that the use of natural and relatively cheap polymer chitosan improves the efficacy of co-digestate centrifugation with respect to K, Cu, and Zn, lowering their load to arable land once a solid fraction is applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Popovic & Fabrizio Gioelli & Elio Dinuccio & Luca Rollè & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Centrifugation of Digestate: The Effect of Chitosan on Separation Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:2302-:d:122538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/12/2302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/12/2302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Themistoklis Sfetsas & Georgia Sarikaki & Afroditi G. Chioti & Vassilis Tziakas & Polycarpos Falaras & George Em. Romanos, 2023. "Fractionation of Anaerobic Digestion Liquid Effluents through Mechanical Treatment and Filtration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Andrea Zanellati & Federica Spina & Luca Rollé & Giovanna Cristina Varese & Elio Dinuccio, 2020. "Fungal Pretreatments on Non-Sterile Solid Digestate to Enhance Methane Yield and the Sustainability of Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. A. Chini & C. E. Hollas & A. C. Bolsan & F. G. Antes & H. Treichel & A. Kunz, 2021. "Treatment of digestate from swine sludge continuous stirred tank reactor to reduce total carbon and total solids content," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12326-12341, August.
    5. Wudneh Ayele Shewa & Martha Dagnew, 2020. "Revisiting Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment of Wastewater: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:2302-:d:122538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.