IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i12p272-d1548421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supervisor Support and Work-Family Practices: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Geraldes

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Maria José Chambel

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Vânia Sofia Carvalho

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

In recent decades, in response to changes in work dynamics, demographics, and technological advancements, organizations have sought to implement practices that facilitate transitions between work and family—so-called work-family practices. Previous research has focused on identifying antecedents for a more positive work-family relationship, employees’ well-being, and positive organizational outcomes. Nevertheless, the development of this research framework over the decades has brought a main conclusion and concern: the availability of these practices is not a measure of organizational success and, to some extent, is dependent on the supportive behaviors of supervisors. To address the growing interest in this topic, a systematic review was conducted to qualitatively analyze the relationship between work-family practices and supervisor support, as well as their subsequent impact on employees and organizations. Following a PRISMA methodology, this review examined 39 articles (40 studies) and corroborated the positive and essential role of supervisor support in enhancing the effectiveness of work-family practices. The findings further clarified its influence on employee well-being and health, workplace attitudes (e.g., commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intention), and the work-family relationship (e.g., conflict and enrichment). Consequently, supervisor support proved imperative for employees and organizational contexts to benefit from work–family practices, going beyond their provision by organizations. Therefore, this research is the first systematic review focusing on recognizing and confirming the importance of work-family practices and supervisor support as foundational components of a family-supportive work environment. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as future research paths, will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Geraldes & Maria José Chambel & Vânia Sofia Carvalho, 2024. "Supervisor Support and Work-Family Practices: A Systematic Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:272-:d:1548421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Henry, Lesley C., 2009. "Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Vânia Carvalho & Maria Chambel, 2014. "Work-to-Family Enrichment and Employees’ Well-Being: High Performance Work System and Job Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 373-387, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohsin, Asad & Lengler, Jorge & Aguzzoli, Roberta, 2015. "Staff turnover in hotels: Exploring the quadratic and linear relationships," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 35-48.
    2. Zuzana Lušňáková & Silvia Lenčéšová & Veronika Hrdá & Mária Šajbidorová, 2020. "Innovative Processes Within Communication and Motivation, Work Environment Care and Creativity Support of Human Resources," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 395-405.
    3. Arif Partono Prasetio, 2016. "The Effect of Human Resource Practice, Perceived Organizational Support and Work-Life Balance in Enhancing Employee's Affective Commitment," GATR Journals jmmr231, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. Masood Badri & Mugheer Al Khaili & Guang Yang & Muna Al Bahar & Asma Al Rashdi, 2022. "Examining the Structural Effect of Working Time on Well-Being: Evidence from Abu Dhabi," International Journal of Social Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 24-44, September.
    5. Lina Vyas & Francis Cheung & Hang-Yue Ngo & Kee-Lee Chou, 2022. "Family-Friendly Policies: Extrapolating A Pathway towards Better Work Attitudes and Work Behaviors in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Monteiro, Natália P. & Straume, Odd Rune & Valente, Marieta, 2021. "When does remote electronic access (not) boost productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Ibrahim Halil Seyrek & Ayhan Turan, 2017. "Effects of Individual Characteristics and Work Related Factors on the Turnover Intention of Accounting Professionals," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 236-244, January.
    8. Maria-Lavinia FLOREA & Anca BORZA, 2017. "Practical Aspects Of Work-Life Balance: Segmentation-Integration Organizational Policies In Services Companies In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 928-942, November.
    9. Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume & Marieta Valente, 2019. "Does Remote Work Improve or Impair Firm Labour Productivity? Longitudinal Evidence from Portugal," CESifo Working Paper Series 7991, CESifo.
    10. Fang, Tony & Lee, Byron & Timming, Andrew R. & Fan, Di, 2019. "The Effects of Work-Life Benefits on Employment Outcomes in Canada: A Multivariate Analysis," IZA Discussion Papers 12322, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Amaya Erro-Garcés & Begoña Urien & Giedrius Čyras & Vita Marytė Janušauskienė, 2022. "Telework in Baltic Countries during the Pandemic: Effects on Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction, and Work-Life Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Godbersen, Hendrik & Ruiz-Fernández, Susana & Machura, Marco & Parlak, Denise Elif & Wirtz, Christian & Gansser, Oliver A., 2022. "Work-life balance measures, work-life balance, and organisational commitment - A structural analysis," ipo Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ipo Institut für Personal- & Organisationsforschung, volume 3, number 3 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Institut für Personal- & Organisationsforschung (IPO), July.
    13. Beckmann, Michael & Hegedüs, Istvan, 2011. "Trust-based working time and organizational performance: evidence from German establishment-level panel data," Working papers 2011/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    14. Southworth, Erica M., 2014. "Shedding gender stigmas: Work-life balance equity in the 21st century," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 97-106.
    15. Parvaneh Bahrami & Saeed Nosratabadi & Khodayar Palouzian & Szilard Hegedus, 2023. "Modeling the Impact of Mentoring on Women's Work-LifeBalance: A Grounded Theory Approach," Papers 2305.16095, arXiv.org.
    16. Saonee Sarker & Manju Ahuja & Suprateek Sarker, 2018. "Work–Life Conflict of Globally Distributed Software Development Personnel: An Empirical Investigation Using Border Theory," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 103-126, March.
    17. M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee, 2018. "Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 229-254, March.
    18. Ioana Gutu & Camelia Nicoleta Medeleanu, 2023. "Assessing Teleworkforce and Electronic Leadership Favorable for an Online Workforce Sustainability Framework by Using PLS SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    19. Gambo Nanven Jephthah & Echu Sunny Godwin & Tongshakap Gyang Dafeng & Olubayo John Popoola & Yusuf Yunana Pindar, 2022. "Work-life Balance and Employee Performance: A study of Female Academic Staff of the University of Jos," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(02), pages 312-323, February.
    20. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chi-Ming Hsieh & Meei-Ying Lan & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Examining the Moderating Effects of Work–Life Balance between Human Resource Practices and Intention to Stay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:272-:d:1548421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.