IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i12p272-d1548421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supervisor Support and Work-Family Practices: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Geraldes

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Maria José Chambel

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Vânia Sofia Carvalho

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

In recent decades, in response to changes in work dynamics, demographics, and technological advancements, organizations have sought to implement practices that facilitate transitions between work and family—so-called work-family practices. Previous research has focused on identifying antecedents for a more positive work-family relationship, employees’ well-being, and positive organizational outcomes. Nevertheless, the development of this research framework over the decades has brought a main conclusion and concern: the availability of these practices is not a measure of organizational success and, to some extent, is dependent on the supportive behaviors of supervisors. To address the growing interest in this topic, a systematic review was conducted to qualitatively analyze the relationship between work-family practices and supervisor support, as well as their subsequent impact on employees and organizations. Following a PRISMA methodology, this review examined 39 articles (40 studies) and corroborated the positive and essential role of supervisor support in enhancing the effectiveness of work-family practices. The findings further clarified its influence on employee well-being and health, workplace attitudes (e.g., commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intention), and the work-family relationship (e.g., conflict and enrichment). Consequently, supervisor support proved imperative for employees and organizational contexts to benefit from work–family practices, going beyond their provision by organizations. Therefore, this research is the first systematic review focusing on recognizing and confirming the importance of work-family practices and supervisor support as foundational components of a family-supportive work environment. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as future research paths, will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Geraldes & Maria José Chambel & Vânia Sofia Carvalho, 2024. "Supervisor Support and Work-Family Practices: A Systematic Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:272-:d:1548421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Henry, Lesley C., 2009. "Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Vânia Carvalho & Maria Chambel, 2014. "Work-to-Family Enrichment and Employees’ Well-Being: High Performance Work System and Job Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 373-387, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wünderlich, Nancy V. & Iseke, Anja & Becker-Özcamlica, Hürrem, 2020. "Branded Employee Behaviour as a Double-Edged Sword: How Perceptions of Service Employees Impact Job Seekers' Application Intentions," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(4), pages 205-215.
    2. Mohsin, Asad & Lengler, Jorge & Aguzzoli, Roberta, 2015. "Staff turnover in hotels: Exploring the quadratic and linear relationships," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 35-48.
    3. Zuzana Lušňáková & Silvia Lenčéšová & Veronika Hrdá & Mária Šajbidorová, 2020. "Innovative Processes Within Communication and Motivation, Work Environment Care and Creativity Support of Human Resources," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 395-405.
    4. Arif Partono Prasetio, 2016. "The Effect of Human Resource Practice, Perceived Organizational Support and Work-Life Balance in Enhancing Employee's Affective Commitment," GATR Journals jmmr231, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    5. Masood Badri & Mugheer Al Khaili & Guang Yang & Muna Al Bahar & Asma Al Rashdi, 2022. "Examining the Structural Effect of Working Time on Well-Being: Evidence from Abu Dhabi," International Journal of Social Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 24-44, September.
    6. Dr. Najia Shaikh & Prof. Dr. Javed Ahmed Chandio, 2024. "Work-Life Balance Policies and Organizational Outcomes: A Qualitative Investigation," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 475-481.
    7. Tanja van der Lippe & Laura den Dulk & Katia Begall, 2024. "Flextime/Flexspace for All in the Organization? A Study of the Availability, Use, and Consequences of Flexible Work Arrangements for Low and High SES Employees in Nine European Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. James Gerard Caillier, 2017. "Do Work-Life Benefits Enhance the Work Attitudes of Employees? Findings from a Panel Study," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 393-408, September.
    9. Lina Vyas & Francis Cheung & Hang-Yue Ngo & Kee-Lee Chou, 2022. "Family-Friendly Policies: Extrapolating A Pathway towards Better Work Attitudes and Work Behaviors in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Jarrod M. Haar & Albert Sune & Marcello Russo & Ariane Ollier-Malaterre, 2019. "A Cross-National Study on the Antecedents of Work–Life Balance from the Fit and Balance Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 261-282, February.
    11. Anja Feierabend & Philippe Mahler & Bruno Staffelbach, 2011. "Are there Spillover Effects of a Family Supportive Work Environment on Employees without Childcare Responsibilities?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 22(2), pages 188-209.
    12. Monteiro, Natália P. & Straume, Odd Rune & Valente, Marieta, 2021. "When does remote electronic access (not) boost productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Ibrahim Halil Seyrek & Ayhan Turan, 2017. "Effects of Individual Characteristics and Work Related Factors on the Turnover Intention of Accounting Professionals," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 236-244, January.
    14. Adame-Sánchez, Consolación & González-Cruz, Tomás F. & Martínez-Fuentes, Clara, 2016. "Do firms implement work–life balance policies to benefit their workers or themselves?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5519-5523.
    15. Tania Hasan & Mehwish Jawaad & Irfan Butt, 2021. "The Influence of Person–Job Fit, Work–Life Balance, and Work Conditions on Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Mediation of Job Satisfaction in the Private Sector of the Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Maria-Lavinia FLOREA & Anca BORZA, 2017. "Practical Aspects Of Work-Life Balance: Segmentation-Integration Organizational Policies In Services Companies In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 928-942, November.
    17. Yutaka Ueda, 2012. "The Relationship between Work-life Balance Programs and Employee Satisfaction: Gender Differences in the Moderating Effect of Annual Income," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 65-74, April.
    18. Maria João Guedes & Maria Eduarda Soares & Pilar Mosquera & João Borregana, 2023. "Does it pay off to offer family-friendly practices? Exploring the missing links to performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 667-690, June.
    19. Carolina Silveira-Rodrigues & Maria José Chambel & Vânia Sofia Carvalho, 2021. "Positive Psychology in Context of Peacekeeping Militaries: A Mediation Model of Work-Family Enrichment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume & Marieta Valente, 2019. "Does Remote Work Improve or Impair Firm Labour Productivity? Longitudinal Evidence from Portugal," CESifo Working Paper Series 7991, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:272-:d:1548421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.