IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i6p107-d567905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Empirical Analysis of the Core Competencies of the Company’s Resource Management Risk. Preliminary Study

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Drozdowski

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland)

  • Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut

    (Economic Department, Jacob of Paradise University in Gorzów Wielkopolski, 66-400 Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland)

  • Jacek Stasiak

    (Non-Public Health Care Center Interschool Department of Rehabilitation and Correction—Scientific Research Center, 95-070 Aleksandrów Łódzki, Poland)

Abstract

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic revealed many weaknesses in the functioning of businesses. It turns out that managers are not prepared to manage the enterprise’s resources in a high-risk environment. Considering risk managers’ issues requires reaching for theoretical and practical knowledge about competencies shaped in unpredictable conditions. This study attempts to determine the importance of the company’s resource management risk among the managerial staff. For the research carried out in 2019–2020, a questionnaire, interview, and literature studies were used. The questionnaire was addressed to 282 managers from western Poland. Particular attention was paid to establishing the crucial components of the company’s resource management competence. Moreover, the regular self-assessment of risk competence made it possible to present preferences in managing strategic resources, depending on the type of position held. The competence of human resources management risk was also examined according to biographical variables (i.e., age, sex, seniority, and total seniority).

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Drozdowski & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Jacek Stasiak, 2021. "The Empirical Analysis of the Core Competencies of the Company’s Resource Management Risk. Preliminary Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:107-:d:567905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/6/107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/6/107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan A. Simunic & Michael T. Stein, 1990. "Audit risk in a client portfolio context," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 329-343, March.
    2. Nicole M. Krause & Isabelle Freiling & Becca Beets & Dominique Brossard, 2020. "Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1052-1059, August.
    3. Audrey Gramling & Arnold Schneider, 2018. "Effects of reporting relationship and type of internal control deficiency on internal auditors’ internal control evaluations," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 33(3), pages 318-335, March.
    4. Terje Aven & Frederic Bouder, 2020. "The COVID-19 pandemic: how can risk science help?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7-8), pages 849-854, August.
    5. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2010. "Risk Management and Governance," Risk, Governance and Society, Springer, number 978-3-642-13926-0, September.
    6. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2009. "On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Paweł Dziekański & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Financial Diversity and the Development Process: Case study of Rural Communes of Eastern Poland in 2009–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Romel Ramón González-Díaz & Ángel Eduardo Acevedo-Duque & Santos Lucio Guanilo-Gómez & Elena Cachicatari Vargas, 2021. "Business counterintelligence as a protection strategy for SMEs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 340-352, March.
    9. Ernst Fehr & Antonio Rangel, 2011. "Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice--Recent Advances," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(4), pages 3-30, Fall.
    10. Samson, Sundeep & Reneke, James A. & Wiecek, Margaret M., 2009. "A review of different perspectives on uncertainty and risk and an alternative modeling paradigm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 558-567.
    11. Lucia Kohnová & Ján Papula & Zuzana Papulová & Katarína Stachová & Zdenko Stacho, 2020. "Job mismatch: the phenomenon of overskilled employees as a result of poor managerial competences," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 83-102, September.
    12. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait, 2022. "Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Eryk Szwarc & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Paulina Golińska-Dawson & Zbigniew Banaszak, 2023. "Proactive Operations Management: Staff Allocation with Competence Maintenance Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Monika Dobrowolska & Janusz Sobon & Dariusz Sobon, 2021. "Economic Calculus and Weak Signals: Prevention Against Foggy Bottom," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 165-174.
    3. Bjerga, Torbjørn & Aven, Terje, 2015. "Adaptive risk management using new risk perspectives – an example from the oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 75-82.
    4. Aven, Terje, 2013. "A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 30-36.
    5. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin de Jong & Andreas Klinke, 2021. "Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-532, March.
    6. Liangang Li & Pingyu Zhang & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "What Affects the Economic Resilience of China’s Yellow River Basin Amid Economic Crisis—From the Perspective of Spatial Heterogeneity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Aven, Terje, 2013. "Practical implications of the new risk perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 136-145.
    8. Yanli Li & Jiayuan Li & Luyao Gan, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Competitiveness and Conditions for Its Realization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Verma, Surabhi & Gustafsson, Anders, 2020. "Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 253-261.
    10. Veland, H. & Aven, T., 2013. "Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 34-40.
    11. Qing He & Yaqin Liu & Qian Yu & Chao Wei, 2022. "Risk Dominance Analysis of R&D Investment Cooperation in Dynamic Option Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Abhishek Sharma & Chandana Hewege & Chamila Perera, 2022. "Violations of CSR Practices in the Australian Financial Industry: How Is the Decision-Making Power of Australian Women Implicated?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Joan Nymand Larsen & Peter Schweitzer & Khaled Abass & Natalia Doloisio & Susanna Gartler & Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen & Jón Haukur Ingimundarson & Leneisja Jungsberg & Alexandra Meyer & Arja Rautio & Joh, 2021. "Thawing Permafrost in Arctic Coastal Communities: A Framework for Studying Risks from Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Paweł Dziekański, 2022. "Local Disproportions of Quality of Life and Their Influence on the Process of Green Economy Development in Polish Voivodships in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Aven, Terje & Zio, Enrico, 2021. "Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Terje Aven, 2013. "On Funtowicz and Ravetz's “Decision Stake—System Uncertainties” Structure and Recently Developed Risk Perspectives," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 270-280, February.
    17. Hui Wang & Shu Xu, 2022. "Heterogeneity Effect of Corporate Financialization on Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait, 2022. "Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Aven, Terje, 2012. "The risk concept—historical and recent development trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 33-44.
    20. Laurence Kranich & Andrés Perea & Hans Peters, 2005. "Core Concepts For Dynamic Tu Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 43-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:107-:d:567905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.