IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3868-d778622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Zbysław Dobrowolski

    (Institute of Public Affairs, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Kraków, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Drozdowski

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland)

  • Mirela Panait

    (Department of Cybernetics, Economic Informatics, Finance and Accounting, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploieşti, Romania)

Abstract

Gen Z, people born in the Internet age, are entering the labour market and soon will be responsible for public administration. Such a situation creates the need to study their professional motivations and competencies. We aim to determine: (1) What are the motivating factors of Gen Z representatives? (2) What is the factor’s structure of competencies of Gen Z employees? (3) Do Gen Z’s interest in public administration result from their needs to realise the public interest? These questions are fundamental for the strategy of hiring and training newcomers. This original paper’s insights have emerged iteratively based on a systematic literature searching method and data obtained from the surveys ( n = 335). Research of Polish representatives of Gen Z showed that their expectations are similar to those found in other countries. However, their responses suggest that ethical issues are not the most important for them. The presence of generation G on the labor market will generate a paradigm shift in the activity of companies and public institutions that will be the employers of these young people. Reconfiguration of the principles of human resource management is necessary so that organizations benefit from the qualities of generation Z—they gravitate towards gamified processes because of mobile-centricity; they are natives of global communication, self-learners, and self-motivators; they appreciate transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait, 2022. "Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3868-:d:778622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Knack & Philip Keefer, 1997. "Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(4), pages 1251-1288.
    2. Vincent T. Covello & Jeryl Mumpower, 1985. "Risk Analysis and Risk Management: An Historical Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 103-120, June.
    3. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Meehee Cho & Mark A. Bonn & Su Jin Han, 2018. "Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Joaquim Silva & Ana Carvalho, 2021. "The Work Values of Portuguese Generation Z in the Higher Education-to-Work Transition Phase," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Zbysław Dobrowolski, 2021. "Energy and Local Safety: How the Administration Limits Energy Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2020. "After COVID-19. Reorientation of crisis management in crisis," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 799-810, December.
    8. Magdalena Rzemieniak & Monika Wawer, 2021. "Employer Branding in the Context of the Company’s Sustainable Development Strategy from the Perspective of Gender Diversity of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2021. "Business Model Canvas and Energy Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-10, November.
    10. Mok, Ka Ho & Marginson, Simon, 2021. "Massification, diversification and internationalisation of higher education in China: Critical reflections of developments in the last two decades," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Jacek Stasiak, 2021. "The Empirical Analysis of the Core Competencies of the Company’s Resource Management Risk. Preliminary Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    12. René M. Stulz, 1996. "Rethinking Risk Management," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 9(3), pages 8-25, September.
    13. Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano & Maria Palazzo & Sara Amabile, 2020. "Hoftsede's cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 53-64, January.
    14. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2010. "Risk Management and Governance," Risk, Governance and Society, Springer, number 978-3-642-13926-0, October.
    15. Lukka, Kari, 2014. "Exploring the possibilities for causal explanation in interpretive research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 559-566.
    16. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Józef Ledzianowski, 2021. "The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, October.
    17. Keith J. Blois, 1999. "Trust in Business to Business Relationships: An Evaluation of its Status," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 197-215, March.
    18. Anuradha Iddagoda & Eglantina Hysa & Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Otilia Manta, 2021. "Green Work-Life Balance and Greenwashing the Construct of Work-Life Balance: Myth and Reality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Power, Michael, 2009. "The risk management of nothing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 849-855, August.
    20. Ching-Hui (Joan) Su & Chin-Hsun (Ken) Tsai & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Wan Qing Lv, 2019. "U.S. Sustainable Food Market Generation Z Consumer Segments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, June.
    21. Minhao Dai & Tianen Chen, 2021. "They Are Just Light Bulbs, Right? The Personality Antecedents of Household Energy-Saving Behavioral Intentions among Young Millennials and Gen Z," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    22. Zbysław Dobrowolski, 2021. "Internet of Things and Other E-Solutions in Supply Chain Management May Generate Threats in the Energy Sector—The Quest for Preventive Measures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-11, August.
    23. Szymon Cyfert & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Maciej Zastempowski, 2021. "Impact of Management Tools Supporting Industry 4.0 on the Importance of CSR during COVID-19. Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    24. Lukka, Kari & Modell, Sven, 2010. "Validation in interpretive management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-477, May.
    25. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Łukasz Sułkowski & Wiesław Danielak, 2021. "Management of Waste Batteries and Accumulators: Quest of European Union Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, October.
    26. Mónika Garai-Fodor & János Varga & Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir, 2021. "Correlation between Generation Z in Hungary and the Motivating Factors to Do Volunteer Work in a Value-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    27. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chaoran Sun & Yumei Li & Sylvia Y. C. L. Kwok & Wenlong Mu, 2022. "The Relationship between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Problematic Social Media Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Serial Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2021. "Business Model Canvas and Energy Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Meidell, Anita & Kaarbøe, Katarina, 2017. "How the enterprise risk management function influences decision-making in the organization – A field study of a large, global oil and gas company," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 39-55.
    4. Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow & Monika Wawer & Anna Głowacz, 2023. "Energy-Efficient City Transportation Solutions in the Context of Energy-Conserving and Mobility Behaviours of Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček & Kristína Koltnerová & Dagmar Cagáňová, 2020. "Perceived Organizational Performance in Recruiting and Retaining Employees with Respect to Different Generational Groups of Employees and Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Modell, Sven, 2017. "Critical realist accounting research: In search of its emancipatory potential," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 20-35.
    7. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2020. "Forensic Auditing and Weak Signals: A Cognitive Approach and Practical Tips," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 247-259.
    8. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Jacek Stasiak, 2021. "The Empirical Analysis of the Core Competencies of the Company’s Resource Management Risk. Preliminary Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Ala-Heikkilä, Virpi & Lämsä, Anna-Maija & Järvenpää, Marko, 2024. "Management accountants—A gendered image," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Lukas Goretzki & Kari Lukka & Martin Messner, 2018. "Controllers’ use of informational tactics," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 700-726, September.
    12. Goretzki, Lukas & Reuter, Marek & Sandberg, Joanna & Thulin, Gabriella, 2022. "Making sense of employee satisfaction measurement – A technological frames of reference perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    13. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2021. "Are the Supreme Audit Institutions Agile? A Cognitive Orientation and Agility Measures," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 52-62.
    14. Constantin Anghelache & Mădălina Gabriela Anghel & Ștefan Virgil Iacob & Ion Pârțachi & Irina Gabriela Rădulescu & Alina Gabriela Brezoi, 2023. "Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Gavin Cassar & Joseph Gerakos, 2017. "Do risk management practices work? Evidence from hedge funds," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1084-1121, September.
    16. Therese R. Viscelli & Mark S. Beasley & Dana R. Hermanson, 2016. "Research Insights About Risk Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    17. Granlund, Markus & Lukka, Kari, 2017. "Investigating highly established research paradigms: Reviving contextuality in contingency theory based management accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 63-80.
    18. Lopez Arceiz, Francisco & Solferino, Nazaria & Solferino, Viviana & Tortia, Ermanno C., 2016. "Corporate social responsibility is just a twist in a Möbius Strip: An empirical test on Italian cooperatives," MPRA Paper 74776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Zbysław Dobrowolski, 2021. "Energy and Local Safety: How the Administration Limits Energy Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-11, August.
    20. Elias G. Carayannis & Klitos Christodoulou & Panayiotis Christodoulou & Savvas A. Chatzichristofis & Zinon Zinonos, 2022. "Known Unknowns in an Era of Technological and Viral Disruptions—Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 587-610, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3868-:d:778622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.