IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i1p19-d756892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework on the Use of Agile Methods in Logistics Startups

Author

Listed:
  • Malena Zielske

    (Faculty of Business and Enterprise, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 20099 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Tobias Held

    (Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 20099 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Athanasios Kourouklis

    (Faculty of Business and Enterprise, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK)

Abstract

Background: The logistics industry has seen the emergence of many startups in recent years. Many of these logistics startups use new technologies to develop disruptive products, services or platforms that are based on software. This paper presents the results of a Delphi study and a survey that were consolidated in a framework. The purpose is to understand the benefits that logistics startups derive from using agile methods, the difficulties they face in using these methods and the evolution of logistics startups in terms of using agile methods. Methods: A Delphi study with 29 experts and a global survey with 95 participants was conducted to look at the implementation of agile methods. The largest group of participants were members of (top) management, agile coaches and team leaders. Results: The framework consolidates gathered data to demonstrate how logistics startups apply agile methods and practices based on the results of the Delphi study and the survey, and how the usage of agile methods changes over the age of logistics startups. The results indicate that younger logistics startups use agile methods predominantly to design product features and maximise customer value, whereas logistics startups older than five years focus more on the optimisation of internal processes. Conclusions: The value of the present study lies in its contribution to the hitherto hardly examined research field of agility in logistics startups and the notable views of the experienced participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Malena Zielske & Tobias Held & Athanasios Kourouklis, 2022. "A Framework on the Use of Agile Methods in Logistics Startups," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:19-:d:756892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/19/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/19/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Halil Ibrahim Cebeci & Shahryar Ghorbani & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "An Integrated Approach for Evaluating Lean Innovation Practices in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Ahmed Zainul Abideen & Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram & Jaafar Pyeman & Abdul Kadir Othman & Shahryar Sorooshian, 2021. "Digital Twin Integrated Reinforced Learning in Supply Chain and Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    4. August-Wilhelm Scheer, 2017. "Theses on Digitalization," Management for Professionals, in: Ferri Abolhassan (ed.), The Drivers of Digital Transformation, chapter 4, pages 33-43, Springer.
    5. Takaki Nagao & Hiromasa Ijuin & Tetsuo Yamada & Keisuke Nagasawa & Lei Zhou, 2021. "COVID-19 Disruption Strategy for Redesigning Global Supply Chain Network across TPP Countries," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Erik Hofmann & Florin Osterwalder, 2017. "Third-Party Logistics Providers in the Digital Age: Towards a New Competitive Arena?," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noha A. Mostafa & Omar Eldebaiky, 2023. "A Sustainable Two-Echelon Logistics Model with Shipment Consolidation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsega Y. Melesse & Chiara Franciosi & Valentina Di Pasquale & Stefano Riemma, 2023. "Analyzing the Implementation of Digital Twins in the Agri-Food Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    3. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Józef Ledzianowski, 2021. "The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Costello Gabriel J., 2018. "Proposing an innovation-based view of the firm," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 37(1), pages 65-79.
    7. Kabadurmus, Ozgur & Kayikci, Yaşanur & Demir, Sercan & Koc, Basar, 2023. "A data-driven decision support system with smart packaging in grocery store supply chains during outbreaks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    9. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    10. Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Christoph T. Schmidt & Armin Heinzl, 2019. "How Pair Programming Influences Team Performance: The Role of Backup Behavior, Shared Mental Models, and Task Novelty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1145-1163, December.
    11. Jakob Keller & Rainer Lasch & Sabine Matook, 2024. "Governance of digital supply networks: Systematic literature review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(4), pages 740-789, November.
    12. Bruno Francisco Diniz Marinho & Isotilia Costa Melo, 2022. "Fostering Innovative SMEs in a Developing Country: The ALI Program Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. , Aisdl, 2020. "The Serendipity Mindset," OSF Preprints w52y9, Center for Open Science.
    14. Helwing Veronique & Verfürth Philip & Franz Martin, 2023. "Trucking (un)limited – the impact of digital platforms on labour in production networks of logistics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(4), pages 177-188, December.
    15. Ivan A. Kapitonov & Tatiana G. Filosofova & Vitaly G. Korolev, 2019. "Development of Digital Economy in the Energy Industry-specific Modernization," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 273-282.
    16. Jiamuyan Xie, 2022. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Competing Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Diane E. Strode, 2016. "A dependency taxonomy for agile software development projects," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 23-46, February.
    18. Asif Qumer Gill & Brian Henderson-Sellers & Mahmood Niazi, 2018. "Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 315-341, April.
    19. , Aisdl, 2020. "Becoming Attuned," OSF Preprints j7f8y, Center for Open Science.
    20. Abdolkarim Rahimiatani & Hamid Zare & Hamidreza Yazdani, 2018. "Increasing Organizational Agility based on Effective Meta-Organizational Parameters," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 140-156, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:19-:d:756892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.