IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v9y2018i4p140-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Organizational Agility based on Effective Meta-Organizational Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Abdolkarim Rahimiatani

    (Ph.D. student in Human Resources Management at Aras International Campus, University of Tehran)

  • Hamid Zare

    (Public Administration Professor, University of Tehran)

  • Hamidreza Yazdani

    (Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management, University of Tehran)

Abstract

Agility in modern era is one of the most important components of organizational superiority towards each other and achieving goals successfully. The speed of doing things and reacting appropriately to the changes are considered as the key factors of success in the present century. However, with a brief glance at the governmental agencies in developing countries, we will find that these agencies are struggling with many problems which prevents their quick and agile performance. Therefore, this research was designed and conducted to explain and identify the effective factors on organizational agility in governmental agencies. The research method used is a case study in which the researcher tried to examine and scrutinize the organizational agility components by studying the taxation organization and conducting open and semi-structured interviews meticulously. Finally, the effective factors were identified. this category was called the meta-organization factors including factors such as economic conditions, media, inter-organizational relationships, intelligent clients, laws and political attitudes. The snowball method has also been used for sampling in the research. At the end of the article, the research model is also stated.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdolkarim Rahimiatani & Hamid Zare & Hamidreza Yazdani, 2018. "Increasing Organizational Agility based on Effective Meta-Organizational Parameters," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 140-156, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:140-156
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/934
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/po/49?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    2. Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z., 1999. "A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-22, May.
    3. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    4. Swafford, Patricia M. & Ghosh, Soumen & Murthy, Nagesh, 2008. "Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 288-297, December.
    5. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svitlana Kuzikova & Tetiana Shcherbak & Olena Blynova & Galina Pobokina & Diana Dyatchenko & Andrii Mariichyn & Ihor Popovych, 2021. "Empirical Research of the Hardiness of the Personality in Critical Conditions of Life," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 57-77, July.
    2. Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Maria José Sá, 2020. "The Potential of Organisations’ SWOT Diagnostic Assessment," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 9, July.
    3. Lea Tamir Tetroashvili & Racheli Mezan, 2020. "Innovation Management in Family Health Clinics in Israel: The Contribution of Customer Needs’ Assessment," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 149-161, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanjai Kumar Shukla & Sushil & Manoj Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Managerial Paradox Toward Flexibility: Emergent Views Using Thematic Analysis of Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 349-370, December.
    2. Ayoub Al-Zabidi & Ateekh Ur Rehman & Mohammed Alkahtani, 2021. "An Approach to Assess Sustainable Supply Chain Agility for a Manufacturing Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    5. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    6. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    7. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2017. "Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 14-33.
    8. Wiweko Probojakti & Hamidah Nayati Utami & Arik Prasetya & Muhammad Faisal Riza, 2024. "Building Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Banking through Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Bruno De Rosa, 2022. "Il controllo nelle "agile organizations": new wine or just new bottles?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 121-148.
    11. Shuxin Zhang & Sid Suntrayuth, 2024. "The Synergy of Ambidextrous Leadership, Agility, and Entrepreneurial Orientation to Achieve Sustainable AI Product Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Mansour Alyahya & Meqbel Aliedan & Gomaa Agag & Ziad H. Abdelmoety, 2023. "Understanding the Relationship between Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Sustainable Performance: The Role of Strategic Agility and Firm Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    13. El-Khalil, Raed & Mezher, Mohamad Ali, 2020. "The mediating impact of sustainability on the relationship between agility and operational performance," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    14. Arash Rezazadeh & Niloofar Nobari, 2018. "Antecedents and consequences of cooperative entrepreneurship: a conceptual model and empirical investigation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 479-507, June.
    15. DeGroote, Sharon E. & Marx, Thomas G., 2013. "The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 909-916.
    16. Um, Juneho & Lyons, Andrew & Lam, Hugo K.S. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dominguez-Pery, Carine, 2017. "Product variety management and supply chain performance: A capability perspective on their relationships and competitiveness implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 15-26.
    17. Agnieszka Stachowiak & Irena Pawłyszyn, 2021. "From Fragility through Agility to Resilience: The Role of Sustainable Improvement in Increasing Organizational Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Juneho Um, 2017. "The impact of supply chain agility on business performance in a high level customization environment," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 10-19, June.
    19. Shekarian, Mansoor & Reza Nooraie, Seyed Vahid & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2020. "An examination of the impact of flexibility and agility on mitigating supply chain disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    20. Chang Juck Suh & In Tae Lee, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Firm’s Strategic Choice for Sustainability in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agility; agilizing; adaptation and compatibility; organizational change;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:140-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.