IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v20y2018i2d10.1007_s10796-016-9672-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • Asif Qumer Gill

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Brian Henderson-Sellers
  • Mahmood Niazi

    (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM)
    Riphah International University)

Abstract

The adoption of agility at a large scale often requires the integration of agile and non-agile development elements for architecting a hybrid adaptive methodology. The challenge is ”which elements or components (agile or non-agile) are relevant to develop the context-aware hybrid adaptive methodology reference architecture?” This paper addresses this important challenge and develops a hybrid adaptive methodology reference architecture model using a qualitative constructive empirical research approach. In this way, we have uncovered the agility, abstraction, business value, business policy, rules, legal, context and facility elements or components that have not been explicitly modelled or discussed in International Standards (IS) such as the ISO/IEC 24744 metamodel. It is anticipated that a context-aware hybrid adaptive methodology can be architected by using the proposed context-aware hybrid adaptive methodology reference architecture elements for a particular situation when using a situational method engineering approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Asif Qumer Gill & Brian Henderson-Sellers & Mahmood Niazi, 2018. "Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 315-341, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-016-9672-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-016-9672-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-016-9672-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-016-9672-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marijn Janssen & Haiko Voort & Anne Fleur Veenstra, 2015. "Failure of large transformation projects from the viewpoint of complex adaptive systems: Management principles for dealing with project dynamics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 15-29, February.
    2. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    3. Elena Kornyshova & Rébecca Deneckère & Bruno Claudepierre, 2011. "Towards Method Component Contextualization," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global, vol. 2(4), pages 49-81, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alok Mishra & Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi, 2023. "Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1504-1522, August.
    2. Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi & Asif Qumer Gill, 2022. "Can Agile Enterprise Architecture be Implemented Successfully in Distributed Agile Development? Empirical Findings," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 221-235, June.
    3. Stephan Berger & Björn Häckel & Lukas Häfner, 2021. "Organizing Self-Organizing Systems: A Terminology, Taxonomy, and Reference Model for Entities in Cyber-Physical Production Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 391-414, April.
    4. Muhammad Asgher Nadeem & Scott Uk-Jin Lee, 2019. "Dynamic Agile Distributed Development Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Qumer Gill & Brian Henderson-Sellers & Mahmood Niazi, 0. "Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    2. Bram Klievink & Bart-Jan Romijn & Scott Cunningham & Hans Bruijn, 2017. "Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 267-283, April.
    3. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    4. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Józef Ledzianowski, 2021. "The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Yan Mandy Dang & Yulei Gavin Zhang & James Morgan, 0. "Integrating switching costs to information systems adoption: An empirical study on learning management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    7. Costello Gabriel J., 2018. "Proposing an innovation-based view of the firm," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 37(1), pages 65-79.
    8. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    9. Malena Zielske & Tobias Held & Athanasios Kourouklis, 2022. "A Framework on the Use of Agile Methods in Logistics Startups," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Fleur C. Khalil, 2022. "Reasons and Factors of Evolution of the Information System in Public Institutions ," GATR Journals jfbr205, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    11. Hui Lei & Xiang Fang & T. M. Rajkumar & Clyde Holsapple, 2022. "Recovering Troubled IT Projects: The Roles of Transformational Leadership and Project Complexity," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 233-245, February.
    12. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    13. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    14. Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Christoph T. Schmidt & Armin Heinzl, 2019. "How Pair Programming Influences Team Performance: The Role of Backup Behavior, Shared Mental Models, and Task Novelty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1145-1163, December.
    15. Bruno Francisco Diniz Marinho & Isotilia Costa Melo, 2022. "Fostering Innovative SMEs in a Developing Country: The ALI Program Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    16. , Aisdl, 2020. "The Serendipity Mindset," OSF Preprints w52y9, Center for Open Science.
    17. Diane E. Strode, 2016. "A dependency taxonomy for agile software development projects," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 23-46, February.
    18. , Aisdl, 2020. "Becoming Attuned," OSF Preprints j7f8y, Center for Open Science.
    19. Abdolkarim Rahimiatani & Hamid Zare & Hamidreza Yazdani, 2018. "Increasing Organizational Agility based on Effective Meta-Organizational Parameters," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 140-156, December.
    20. Cancan Wang & Rony Medaglia & Tina Blegind Jensen, 2021. "When Ambiguity Rules: The Emergence of Adaptive Governance from (In)Congruent Frames of Knowledge Sharing Technology," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1573-1591, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-016-9672-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.