IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v3y2013i1p1-11d31756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Death Row Confessions and the Last Meal Test of Innocence

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin M. Kniffin

    (Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

  • Brian Wansink

    (Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

Abstract

Post hoc analyses of Rector v. Arkansas have regularly highlighted that the defendant requested that part of his last meal be saved so that he could it eat later. While the observation is typically raised as part of arguments that Rector was incompetent and unfit for execution, the more basic fact is that commentators have drawn important inferences about Rector’s mental state from how he treated his last meal. In this essay, we draw upon multiple disciplines in order to apply the same inferential logic to a much broader sample and explore the question of whether traditionally customized last meals might offer signals of defendants’ guilt or innocence. To investigate this, the content of last-meal requests and last words reported for people executed in the United States during a recent five-year period were examined. Consistent with the idea that declination of the last meal is equivalent to a signal of (self-perceived) innocence, those who denied guilt were 2.7 times as likely to decline a last meal than people who admitted guilt (29% versus 8%). Consistent with the complementary theory that people who admit guilt are relatively more “at peace” with their sentence, these individuals requested 34% more calories of food than the rest of the sample (2786 versus 2085 calories). A third finding is that those who denied guilt also tended to eat significantly fewer brand-name food items. Previous discussions of last meals have often lacked quantitative measurements; however, this systematic analysis shows that last meal requests offer windows into self-perceived or self-proclaimed innocence. Knowing one’s last meal request and one’s last words can provide valuable new variables for retrospectively assessing the processes that led to past executions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin M. Kniffin & Brian Wansink, 2013. "Death Row Confessions and the Last Meal Test of Innocence," Laws, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:1-11:d:31756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/3/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/3/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin M Kniffin & Brian Wansink, 2012. "It’s Not Just Lunch: Extra-Pair Commensality Can Trigger Sexual Jealousy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-4, July.
    2. Wallendorf, Melanie & Arnould, Eric J, 1991. ""We Gather Together": Consumption Rituals of Thanksgiving Day," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 13-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Wei-Yun Lin, 2018. "Does Raising Value Co-creation Increase All Customers’ Happiness?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1053-1067, November.
    2. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    3. Cova, Bernard & Salle, Robert, 2000. "Rituals in managing extrabusiness relationships in international project marketing: a conceptual framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 669-685, December.
    4. Gainer, Brenda, 1995. "Ritual and relationships: Interpersonal influences on shared consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 253-260, March.
    5. Weiqiang Tan & Jian Zhang, 2021. "Good Days, Bad Days: Stock Market Fluctuation and Taxi Tipping Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3965-3984, June.
    6. Emi Moriuchi & Michael Basil, 2019. "The Sustainability of Ohanami Cherry Blossom Festivals as a Cultural Icon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Maribel Carvalho Suarez & Leticia Moreira Casotti, 2015. "Transcending Individual Approach of Consumption: an Investigation of Automobile Meanings by The Household Perspective," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(2), pages 87-109, March.
    8. Hausman, Angela, 2012. "Hedonistic rationality: Healthy food consumption choice using muddling-through," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 794-801.
    9. Marco Guerzoni & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2014. "Music consumption at the dawn of the music industry: the rise of a cultural fad," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(2), pages 145-171, May.
    10. Korkman, Oskar & Storbacka, Kaj & Harald, Bo, 2010. "Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 236-247.
    11. Ovul Sezer & Michael I. Norton & Francesca Gino & Kathleen D. Vohs, 2016. "Family Rituals Improve the Holidays," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(4), pages 509-526.
    12. Veeck, Ann & Burns, Alvin C., 2005. "Changing tastes: the adoption of new food choices in post-reform China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 644-652, May.
    13. Floyd Rudmin, 2016. "The Consumer Science of Sharing: A Discussant's Observations," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 198-209.
    14. Woodside, Arch G. & Ozcan, Timucin, 2009. "Customer choices of manufacturer versus retailer brands in alternative price and usage contexts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 100-108.
    15. Bradford, Tonya Williams & Sherry, John F., 2013. "Orchestrating rituals through retailers: An examination of gift registry," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 158-175.
    16. Takhar, Amandeep & Jamal, Ahmad & Kizgin, Hatice, 2021. "Transcultural identity development among third generation minority consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 132-142.
    17. Klinner, Nicole S. & Walsh, Gianfranco, 2013. "Customer perceptions of discrimination in service deliveries: Construction and validation of a measurement instrument," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 651-658.
    18. Strizhakova, Yuliya & Coulter, Robin A. & Price, Linda L., 2008. "The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 82-93.
    19. Schembri, Sharon, 2009. "Reframing brand experience: The experiential meaning of Harley-Davidson," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1299-1310, December.
    20. Michaud Trevinal, Aurélia & Stenger, Thomas, 2014. "Toward a conceptualization of the online shopping experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 314-326.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:1-11:d:31756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.